In the case involving ™STEVEN MACARTHUR-BROOKS© ESTATE and ™STEVEN MACARTHUR-BROOKS© IRR TRUST Plaintiffs, acting through their Attorney-In-Fact, and Defendants, SDCCU and SHEPPARD MULLIN, significant developments have occurred in the wake of a Writ of Mandamus being submitted to Judge Roy K. Altman’s chambers and the Supreme Court of the United States. Several pivotal documents have been added to the official court record, underscoring the plaintiffs’ relentless efforts to re-affirm defendants’ dishonor, default, and willful and intentional non-compliance. However, one crucial document remains conspicuously absent from the record, further complicating the judicial process.
Steven MacArthur Brooks’ estate has filed a $2.975 billion lawsuit against San Diego County Credit Union, asserting a binding contract and seeking summary judgment. The lawsuit emphasizes the plaintiffs’ status as secured creditors under UCC provisions, supported by unrebutted affidavits and evidence of contractual acceptance. The case centers on a contract and security agreement, with claims of non-response from defendants validating the demand for summary judgment as a matter of law.
When a purported borrower takes out a loan from a bank, it may appear that the bank is lending its own money. However, under 12 U.S.C. § 83, banks are prohibited from lending their own funds. Instead, they use the purported borrower’s promissory note as collateral to create credit, not using their own capital. This process lacks transparency, leading to non-disclosure and fraud, which may render such agreements void ab initio (invalid from the outset).
The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) governs commercial transactions in the United States, providing a standardized set of laws for dealings involving the sale of goods, leasing of goods, negotiable instruments, secured transactions, and other commercial activities. It is one of the most important frameworks for regulating commercial law across different states.
All contracts with the government are fundamentally voluntary, allowing every man and woman to stand on their rights and exemptions as private citizens. When proceeding, In Propria Persona, sui juris, One can reserve their natural common law right not to be compelled to perform under any contract that they did not enter into knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally. One can not be forced to accept the liability associated with any compelled and pretended "benefit" of any hidden or unrevealed contract or commercial agreement. As such, the hidden or unrevealed contracts that supposedly create obligations to perform, for persons of "subject status," are inapplicable to private citizens/non-citizen nationals/nationals/State Citizens/nationals of the United States, and are null and void.
Without permission and against express written revocation of any presumed authorization to use a social security number, Rancho California Water District is acting against express instructions and blatantly committing fraud and stealing the information of Americans.
In contract disputes, parol evidence is any agreement that is not contained within the written contract. Under the parol evidence rule, these […]
Certificates of Non Citizen Nationality The Department of State occasionally receives requests for certificates of non-citizen national status pursuant to […]
In the realm of financial obligations, there is a fundamental principle that separates the tangible from the intangible, the government-created […]
The video in question showcases instances where broadcasting experienced what could be termed as “coincidental” disruptions, including segments of the […]
Intangible assets, though lacking physical form, are the bedrock of contemporary finance. They range from Federal Reserve Notes—our cash in […]