who should file a 1099a for checks dollars credit use and paymanets and utility bills

Who Should File Form 1099-A Based on Facts, Definitions, and IRS Instructions?

Form 1099-A, titled “Acquisition or Abandonment of Secured Property,” is utilized for the “Abandonment” or “Acquisition” of secured property. The IRS directives from 2022 state:

“Use Form 1099-A, Acquisition or Abandonment of Secured Property, when you lend money in connection with your trade or business and you either acquire an interest in property that is security for the debt, or you know that the property has been abandoned. This reporting requirement applies even if you are not in the business of lending money.”

The IRS further clarifies that “Property” encompasses: “real property (like a personal residence), any intangible property, and tangible personal property, with certain exceptions.”

1099a instructions from IRS included ANY INTANGIBLE secured property

This leads us to evaluate three key concepts: “Intangible Property,” “Interest,” and “Security.”

Intangible Property” is defined as property that doesn’t have intrinsic and marketable value on its own but represents or evidences value, such as stock certificates, bonds, promissory notes, checks, dollars/federal reserve notes, credit, debt instruments, UCC1 Filings, and franchises.

Interest,” particularly in relation to Property, is a broad term covering rights and claims to lands or chattels.

Security” and “Securities” refer to evidences of debts or property rights and obligations to pay money or participate in earnings and distribution of corporate, trust, and other property assets.

Therefore, when the IRS refers to “obligations” in Form 1099-A, it includes, but is not limited to, promissory notes, deeds, liens, checks, federal reserve notes, deposits, credit payments and use (like car payments, credit card payments, utility bills, etc.).

So, revisiting the IRS instructions with this understanding:

“File Form 1099-A for each borrower if you, in your trade or business, lend money and, as full or partial satisfaction of the debt, acquire an interest in property that serves as security for the debt, or have reason to believe the property has been abandoned. This reporting requirement applies even if you are not primarily in the business of lending money.”

In summary, the filing of a 1099-A is mandatory not just for those in the lending business. It’s required if you have acquired or abandoned any secured property, such as promissory notes, deeds, liens, checks, federal reserve notes, deposits, credit payments and use (like car payments, credit card payments, utility bills, etc.).

Leave your vote

45933 points
More

Don’t Stop Here

More To Explore

Screen Shot 2025 07 12 at 1.03.15 PM

How to Recuse a Federal Judge — And Why It’s Mandatory and They Must Step Down Immediately Under 28 U.S.C. § 144 and § 455

Learn how to lawfully recuse a biased federal judge using 28 U.S.C. §§ 144 and 455. Once a verified motion and affidavit are filed, disqualification is immediate, mandatory, and strips the judge of all jurisdiction. Any continued action by that judge is ultra vires and void ab initio. This article exposes the legal authority behind automatic recusal and outlines your remedies if the judge refuses to step down.Ask ChatGPT

Screen Shot 2025 07 09 at 1.55.31 PM

EXPOSING JUDICIAL FRAUD: How a Federal Judge Otis D. Wright, II Ignored Civil Rights Law, Violated Due Process, and Tried to Bury a Federal Removal Under 28 U.S.C. § 1443(1)

A federal judge’s July 2025 order is now under fire for unlawfully striking a removal, misapplying criminal statutes, ignoring unrebutted affidavits, and participating in a fraudulent party substitution. The case, originally removed under 28 U.S.C. § 1443(1), involves severe allegations of constitutional violations, jurisdictional fraud, and due process abuse. Despite clear legal precedent barring time limits on § 1443 removals, the court falsely claimed the removal was untimely and smeared the petitioner with defamatory labels. This article exposes the judicial misconduct, factual distortions, and illegality underlying the void order now being challenged.

Screen Shot 2025 07 08 at 9.35.01 PM

EMERGENCY PETITION FOR WRIT MANDAMUS VANISHES: Ninth Circuit Fraud, Tampering, Judicial Collusion, and a Federal Cover-Up Seems Unequivocal

Federal courts are now under scrutiny after a verified Writ of Mandamus vanished from the Ninth Circuit docket without explanation—raising grave concerns of judicial tampering, fraud, and systemic misconduct. Judge Sunshine Sykes defied clear jurisdictional divestiture by issuing rulings on a matter under appellate review, violating 28 U.S.C. § 144 and § 1651. This article exposes a disturbing pattern of ultra vires acts, denial of due process, and potential RICO violations implicating both district and appellate judges.Ask ChatGPT

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.

error: Content is protected !!