Banking Collusion and Deceit In America The IRS is JP Morgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Bank of America, and more

Behind the Curtain: IRS, Chase, Citi, American Express, and Wells Fargo’s Hidden Corporate Links

An exploration of corporate records reveals surprising links between well-known institutions and corporations, suggesting a deep, interconnected web involving the IRS, the American Bar Association (ABA), and Northern Trust Corporation. These details provide insight into the corporate structure of entities many view as governmental and independent but may, in fact, operate under the same corporate umbrella. Original article on REALWORLDFARE.com.

The IRS: An Incorporated Entity

The IRS was initially incorporated as “INTERNAL REVENUE TAX AND AUDIT SERVICE, INC” on July 12, 1933, under File Number #0325720. This incorporation indicates that the IRS is not merely a government agency but a corporate entity operating under private law. This challenges the common perception of the IRS as a strictly federal tax-collecting agency.

Based on research, the IRS is/was held by Northern Trust Corporation, with its File Number: 0774471. Northern Trust Corporation, incorporated on August 23, 1971, is a general domestic corporation registered in Delaware, with its registered agent listed as The Corporation Trust Company. These details align with the structure and function of corporations, which typically have registered agents and filing numbers.

Northern Trust Corporation: The Hub of Influence

Northern Trust Corporation holds significant influence through its ownership of various major entities, including:

  • IRS Company
  • JPMorgan Chase & Co.
  • Citigroup, Inc.
  • American Express Company
  • SPDR Gold Shares
  • General Electric Co.
  • Wells Fargo & Company
  • UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
  • Bank of America Corporation

This extensive list highlights the corporation’s reach across banking, healthcare, gold reserves, and various sectors of the American economy. Such control suggests a concentration of power and raises questions about how these institutions may be working in concert.

Fed Bank Stress Tests Tzok 1200x836 4198653393

Wells Fargo and the Bar Association

Wells Fargo, one of the largest banks in the United States, is/was owned by the American Bar Association, which itself falls under the control of Northern Trust Corporation. This blurs the lines between legal and financial institutions, suggesting that the ABA, often perceived as a regulatory and advisory body, also plays a significant role in financial activities through its control over banking institutions.

Dunn & Bradstreet’s Ties to the Bar Association

Dunn & Bradstreet, a well-known business credit reporting agency, is/was also owned by the American Bar Association. This ownership implies that the ABA may have access to a vast network of corporate information and financial records, giving it significant leverage over the business and legal landscape.

The Role of Judges and the Legal System

Every time a judge makes a judgment, their affiliation as a member of the Bar is a key factor in the decision. If the Bar Association holds control over major banking institutions and credit agencies, the potential conflict of interest becomes evident. This raises the question: are judgments truly impartial when the judges themselves are members of an organization that controls such vast financial power?

JP Morgan Chase: The IRS’s Receiving Agent

Adding another layer to this network is the role of JP Morgan Chase as the receiving agent for IRS documents. When IRS documents are sent, they are processed through JP Morgan Chase, which acts as an intermediary between the sender and the IRS. This connection further highlights the integration of financial institutions in the operations of what is often seen as a federal agency, suggesting a deeper corporate structure at play.

463111550 537948908984033 5728867214760595493 n

462853545 10120815715047118 3490715905657504283 n

Historical Patterns and the Fallout

Paperwork was once submitted to support a claim that taxes were not owed, and when this document was admitted as evidence, the law firm involved eventually declared bankruptcy and left the state. This could indicate either a strategic retreat or an acknowledgment of the complexities surrounding these corporate relationships and tax matters.

Conclusion

The connections between the IRS, the American Bar Association, Northern Trust Corporation, and various financial and legal entities suggest a highly integrated system where legal, financial, and governmental powers may not be as separate as they appear. If these entities are indeed tied under one corporate umbrella, it fundamentally changes the understanding of their roles in society.

These connections highlight the importance of questioning corporate and governmental affiliations and remaining vigilant about how these entities influence each other. It serves as a reminder that the distinction between public and private sectors can often be murkier than it seems.

Leave your vote

84672 points
More

Don’t Stop Here

More To Explore

Screen Shot 2025 02 14 at 6.28.53 PM

Riverside, California Billion Dollar Judicial Misconduct Exposed? Fraud, Docket Manipulation in Kevin Walker Estate vs Sierra Pacific Mortgage Company

Central to the Plaintiffs’ claims are five (5) unrebutted affidavits submitted in compliance with UCC § 3-505, which explicitly establish the Defendants’ dishonor and tacit admission to all claims outlined therein. These affidavits, accompanied by an Affidavit Certificate of Non-Response, stand as irrefutable evidence in commerce. Under binding legal principles, such as stare decisis, res judicata, and collateral estoppel, the facts contained in the affidavits are now deemed conclusively established and uncontested. Despite United States Postal Service (USPS) tracking records confirming that the filings were successfully delivered twice—once via Registered Mail and once via Express Mail—the documents are not reflected on the court docket. Additionally, one (1) critical notice sent to the court has gone missing entirely, with USPS failing to mark it as delivered or account for its whereabouts.This disappearance of properly filed documents raises serious concerns about potential malicious interference, fraud upon the court, and obstruction of justice.

Screen Shot 2025 02 15 at 2.26.29 PM

A Verified Complaint as a Negotiable Debt Instrument and Special Deposit: Legal and Financial Implications Under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2041, 2042, 2045, 12 U.S.C. § 1813, and 31 U.S.C. §§ 1321 & 3302 – Application of IRS Forms 1099-OID, 1099-A, and 1099-B

A verified complaint submitted to the court functions not only as a legal pleading but also as a negotiable debt instrument and a special deposit, as established under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2041, 2042, and 2045. Additionally, it is classified as a financial asset governed by 12 U.S.C. § 1813(l)(1), 31 U.S.C. § 1321(a)(62), and 31 U.S.C. § 3302. Courts operate as depository institutions, responsible for receiving, managing, and investing funds, with all case-related deposits held in trust by the U.S. Treasury. Furthermore, under 26 U.S.C. §§ 1271-1275, a verified complaint qualifies as an Original Issue Discount (OID) security, mandating proper financial reporting. Every legal case is effectively a commercial transaction, in which funds, securities, and judgments are recorded and managed within the court’s custodial accounts. Understanding a verified complaint as a financial obligation allows for proper accounting and the reclamation of funds through the use of IRS Forms 1099-A and 1099-OID, thereby ensuring transparency and compliance with federal financial regulations.

Using IRS Forms 3949-A and 211 to Expose Organized Crime, Corrupt Judges, Clerks, Courts, and Financial Misconduct

Using IRS Forms 3949-A and 211 to Expose Organized Crime, Corrupt Judges, Clerks, Courts, and Financial Misconduct

Corruption within the judicial system, including fraudulent accounting, improper banking practices, and organized crime, poses a severe threat to justice and financial stability. Fortunately, whistleblowers have powerful tools at their disposal to report such misconduct to the Department of the Treasury – Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Two of the most effective mechanisms for exposing financial fraud involving corrupt courts, clerks, judges, and officials are IRS Form 3949-A (Information Referral) and IRS Form 211 (Application for Award for Original Information).

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.

error: Content is protected !!