™WALKERNOVA GROUP©
We are a private firm specializing in private citizen/non-citizen national/national, and State Citizen rights, Common Law, Constitutional Law, private Banking, Private & Public Law, Securities, Secured Party/Secured Creditor filings, Taxes, Debt Instruments, Foreclosure, Business, Estate Planning, UCC Contract Trusts and Law, and transactions involving a Trust, Contract, Negotiable Instrument, Deed, Bond, and/or Equity.
A right not exercised is a right lost, and benefits and privileges are not the same as rights. Living men and women are deprived “under the color of law” every day due to the complexities involved with interpreting and truly comprehending contracts, law, legalese, and the “legal”[not the same as lawful] daily use of propaganda, threats, coercion, and other unconstitutional tactics.
Some commonly misinterpreted terms: individual, bank, financial institution, person, state Citizen, national, U.S. citizen, secured party, “attorney at law” vs “attorney in fact”
LATEST NEWS
Incoming WRIT OF MANDAMUS as Judge Roy K Altman’s Clerks Mutilate Records, Obstruct Filings, and Engage in Racketeering and Conspiracy
While the order purports to address procedural concerns, its broader implications—and the actions (or inactions) of the court—have sparked significant criticism. The case has drawn attention due to the court’s handling of filings, its potential disregard for due process, and what many perceive as a concerning lack of judicial accountability. When contacting the CLERKS in chambers to inquire about to missing filing/documents which have clearly been receiving, the clerks either refuse to provide any information or guidance on a time frame, and/or they act arrogantly and hang up in your face, telling you to "never call chambers." The clerks act as if they are above the law and they show little to no respect for the people as their public servants.
Explained: The difference between ‘Pro Se’ and ‘In Propria Persona’
While "pro se" and "in propria persona" both involve self-representation, their underlying philosophies and legal implications differ significantly.’ Pro Se’ litigants work within the framework of the court, seeking remedies and relief through statutory law. In contrast, ‘In Propria Persona‘ litigants assert their inherent rights without pleading to the court, challenging jurisdiction and emphasizing their status as a natural person. Both approaches have their place in legal contexts, but success often hinges on the individual’s ability to articulate their position effectively and navigate the complexities of the legal system. Understanding these distinctions empowers individuals to choose the approach that best aligns with their goals and principles when representing themselves in court.
Understanding the Legal Frameworks: U.C.C., U.S.C., CFR, U.S. Constitution, Organic Constitution, and State Constitutions
The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) standardizes commercial transaction laws across all U.S. states, ensuring consistency in commerce, contracts, and finance. The United States Code (USC) organizes federal statutes into 54 titles, serving as the legal foundation for areas like taxation, criminal law, and public welfare. The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) provides detailed rules from federal agencies to implement these statutes, defining industry-specific compliance. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law, establishing the framework for governance and safeguarding individual rights, while state constitutions address local governance and rights within the bounds of federal law. The Organic Constitution, encompassing foundational documents like the Declaration of Independence and Articles of Confederation, offers historical context and reflects the Founders’ vision of limited federal power and state sovereignty. Together, these frameworks define the interplay between federal, state, and administrative laws.
$16 Billion Case Against SDCCU: Plaintiffs Demand Default, Sanctions, and Summary Judgment in Response to Judge Altman’s Order
In a decisive move to hold the Defendants accountable for their ongoing misconduct and failure to comply with court orders, the Plaintiffs have filed a "SUPPLEMENTAL AFFIRMATION OF RECORD, NOTICE OF DEFENDANTS’ CONTINUED DISHONOR, DEFAULT, AND WILLFUL NONCOMPLIANCE, AND REQUEST [DEMAND] FOR SANCTIONS, SUMMARY JUDGEMENT, AND RELIEF" in the ongoing litigation before Judge Roy K. Altman. This filing underscores the Plaintiffs’ determination to secure justice and highlights the Defendants’ blatant disregard for the legal process, affirming the legal basis for sanctions, default judgment, and summary judgment in the Plaintiffs’ favor.
Comprehensive Remedies for Addressing Judicial Delays and Inaction
If a judge takes an excessive amount of time to decide a case, there are multiple actions you can take, including some lesser-known or rare strategies. These options range from procedural remedies to extraordinary measures, depending on the severity of the delay and the jurisdiction. Below is a comprehensive list
Equity vs. UCC: A Comparative Analysis of Remedies, Predictability, and Incorporation of Principles
The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) and equity law provide distinct frameworks for resolving disputes and enforcing obligations. Equity law focuses on fairness and flexibility, often stepping in when strict legal rules lead to unjust outcomes. Conversely, the UCC brings structure and predictability to commercial transactions while incorporating equitable principles to ensure fairness in its application. This article explores how the UCC integrates equity, examines the strengths and weaknesses of each system, and highlights key provisions like UCC §§ 1-103, 2-202, 2-203, 2-204, 2-206, 2-302, 3-303, 3-311, 3-603, 3-604, and others.
Discharging ANY Debt: How the “Accepted for Value” (A4V) Process is Codified in the Uniform Commercial Code 👀
The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) provides a structured legal framework for negotiable instruments, obligations, and their discharge. Among its provisions, sections like UCC §§ 3-303, 3-604, 3-104, 3-409, 2-206, and 1-103 reveal a clear foundation for the Accepted for Value (A4V) process. This process allows obligations such as mortgages, loans, or other debts to be addressed through lawful mechanisms of discharge, settlement, or setoff.
Riverside County West Coast Exotic Cars Faces $1 Billion Lawsuit for Fraud, Racketeering, Monopolization of Trade and Commerce, and more
West Coast Exotic Cars, along with Eric Curran, Aaron Johnson, Hunter, and additional staff, are embroiled in a $1 billion
STEVEN MACARTHUR BROOKS Estate Files $2.975 BILLION Lawsuit Against SAN DIEGO COUNTY CREDIT UNION Seeking Summary Judgement
Steven MacArthur Brooks’ estate has filed a $2.975 billion lawsuit against San Diego County Credit Union, asserting a binding contract and seeking summary judgment. The lawsuit emphasizes the plaintiffs’ status as secured creditors under UCC provisions, supported by unrebutted affidavits and evidence of contractual acceptance. The case centers on a contract and security agreement, with claims of non-response from defendants validating the demand for summary judgment as a matter of law.
The Fourteenth Amendment: Clarifying the Superiority of ‘state citizen’ Rights over ‘U.S. citizen’ Rights
The Fourteenth Amendment created and clarified the concept of U.S. citizenship. Before the amendment, it was widely believed and accepted
Behind the Curtain: IRS, Chase, Citi, American Express, and Wells Fargo’s Hidden Corporate Links
Explore the secret ties between major entities like Bank of America, Chase, Wells Fargo, and the IRS, all controlled under Northern Trust Corporation. Learn how these financial powerhouses, alongside the American Bar Association, work together to dominate the legal and financial systems. Delve into their interconnected influence and how it shapes the role of government agencies and banks in America. Uncover the truth behind this corporate web and its impact on society.
Explained: What is a “Sovereign Citizen” ?
The term "Sovereign Citizen" is a derogatory and weaponized label, used as propaganda to describe men or women who claim sovereignty but lack a full understanding of the legal distinctions between public and private law. As outlined in CFR § 27.11 and Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 of the U.S. Constitution, the commercial nature of all interactions is evident, yet these individuals struggle to navigate this framework correctly. They attempt to reserve their rights and operate independently but misuse terminology, failing to create unsworn declarations that comply with 28 U.S. Code § 1746. They also misunderstand critical concepts like jurisdiction, contract law, and administrative procedures. They often mix public and private law, leaving them unable to effectively assert and protect their rights as intended under UCC § 1-308. Additionally, they overlook the significance of Article 1, Section 10 of the Constitution, which highlights the restrictions placed on states concerning legal tender, further emphasizing the complexities they misunderstand.
SERVICES & PRODUCTS
-
GHOST Attorney/Writer Lawsuit, Pleading, Affidavit, Document Service: Automobiles, Foreclosures, Credit Cards, Quiet Title Actions, Slander of Title,
$5,000.00 Select options This product has multiple variants. The options may be chosen on the product page -
Eliminate PURPORTED “Loan” on private Automobile, Recoup Assets, Payments, and ALL Money Paid
$3,600.00 Add to cart -
Secured Party/Creditor: Correct Status, Claim Estate, All Assets, Exemption, and Rights
Original price was: $250,000.00.$10,000.00Current price is: $10,000.00. Add to cart -
Private