Citizenship in the united States of America United States citizens, non citizen Nationals, Secured Party, and Non Resident Alien

Citizenship in the united States of America: United States citizens, non-citizen Nationals, Secured Party, and Non-Resident Alien

 

Private Citizen – is someone who is private and not governed by any de facto corporation like the U.S. Corporation or it’s subsidiaries like STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF TEXAS, etc.

 

American National – a private citizen of anywhere in America; North or South America, anywhere whatsoever — can be on Indian territory/Tribal territory in Canada or Mexico; or you can be a resident of your city, located at one of the sovereign republic states, without interfacing jurisdiction in the Corporation “UNITED STATES.”

 

State Citizen an American National who is not an Indian, not from Canada, not from Mexico or South America or Caribbean. A state citizen is one who is domiciled in the republic common law of California, Texas, New York, etc..

 

Non-Resident Alien [with respect to the UNITED STATES (corporation)] – means you are residing in the republic, and in the view of the UNITED STATES (corporation), you are not residing in their jurisdiction, so they have no territorial jurisdiction; by being an alien (foreigner), they also do not have in personum jurisdiction.

 

Secured Party/Secured Creditor (“SPC” or “SPSC”) – someone who was a U.S. Citizen and has a U.S. birth certificate (banknote and prima face evidence of a pledge and trust) or Certificate of Citizenship (if born abroad), or permanent resident who has a green card and social security number; who has voided and canceled the invisible, unknown, and/or fraudulent contracts creating the “U.S. Citizen/Resident/Franchise/Artificial Entity/Trust, and taken control of their Birth Certificate, Estate, their LEGAL NAME trust/Franchise/Artificial Entity; and can operate freely to discharge debts via the Treasury, via administrative process, or via court actions at will. That is given you understand Law and that you can only “pay” with gold or silver not debt notes aka Dollars/Federal Reserve NOTES/portable bonds, or bonds, or bills of exchange/exchange contracts, or checks, or promissory notes.  A Secured Party/Secured Creditor is a specific type of man or woman which at one point in time, perhaps for much of his or her life, has mistakenly thought they were themselves (not their artificial entity/ens legis/trust/franchise) were a “U.S. Citizen” or Permanent Resident, due to misinformation, propaganda, and improper disclosure,; but after discovering who they really are and understanding what citizenship really means, and the fraud and scam that the government is really a private corporation running a voluntary society, has preserved their rights and claim their sovereign status and unalienable rights, through educating themselves and executing various paperwork processes.

 

United States citizenThe fourteenth amendment creates and defines citizenship of the “United States” (corporation: like Subway).

” The fourteenth amendment creates and defines citizenship of the United States. It had long been contended, and had been held by many learned authorities, and had never been judicially decided to the contrary, that there was no such thing as a citizen of the United States, except as that condition arose from citizenship of some state. No mode existed, it was said, of obtaining a citizenship of the United States, except by first becoming a citizen of some state. This question is now at rest. The fourteenth amendment defines and declares who shall be citizens of the United States, to wit, “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” The latter qualification was intended to exclude the children of foreign representatives and the like. With this qualification, every person born in the United States or naturalized is declared to be a citizen of the United States and of the state wherein he resides.

After creating and defining citizenship of the United States, the fourteenth amendment provides, that “no state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States.” This clause is intended to be a protection, not to all our rights, but to our rights as citizens of the United States only; that is to rights existing or belonging to that condition or capacity. The expression, citizen of a state, used in the previous paragraph, is carefully omitted here. In article 4. § 2, subd. 1. of the constitution of the United States, it had been already provided, that “the citizens of each state shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of citizens in the several states.” The rights of citizens of the states and of citizens of the United States are each guarded by these different provisions. That these rights are separate and distinct, was held in the Slaughterhouse Cases, 16 “Wall. [83 U. S.] 36, recently decided by the supreme court. The rights of citizens of the state, as such, are not under consideration in the fourteenth amendment. They stand as they did before the adoption of the fourteenth amendment, and are fully guaranteed by other provisions. The rights of citizens of the states have been the subject of judicial decision on more than one occasion. “-[UNITED STATES V. ANTHONY (1873)]

 

 

See: The Constitution: Gold and Silver is The Only Real Money and Everything else is Credit

See: From Gold to Bonds: House Joint Resolution 192 of 1933, Pubic Law 73-10 and The Transformation of America’s Financial Infrastructure

Leave your vote

92729 points
More

Don’t Stop Here

More To Explore

20410479 329d 40a2 8d4d 492022986bb5

Void Means Void: When Judges Act Without Jurisdiction, Their Orders Are Legal Nullities

When a court acts without lawful jurisdiction—whether through improper removal, lack of subject matter or personal authority, or constitutional violations—its orders are void ab initio and carry no legal force. This article explains how judges who continue to issue rulings after losing jurisdiction are not merely mistaken—they are acting under color of law and are subject to direct civil liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Backed by black-letter case law and statutory authority, this piece dismantles the myth of absolute judicial immunity and affirms a fundamental truth in law: jurisdiction is everything. When it’s gone, so is the court’s power to act.

Riverside County Commissioner Tamara Wagner Sued Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for Railroading Plaintiffs Under Color of Law Without Jurisdiction

Riverside County Commissioner Tamara Wagner Sued Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for Railroading Plaintiffs Under Color of Law Without Jurisdiction

In a federal civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Plaintiffs Kevin: Realworldfare and Corey: Walker expose Riverside Court Commissioner Tamara L. Wagner’s unlawful railroading under color of law and total absence of jurisdiction. Despite a pending Quiet Title Action and perfected federal removal, Wagner issued void orders to dispossess the Walker Estate—yet the Estate remains lawfully and firmly in possession. Now under Article III jurisdiction, Judge Kenly Kiya Kato presides over the live case, which alleges constitutional violations, commercial fraud, and abuse of process. This is a high-stakes confrontation between equity and overreach—where immunity fails and facts prevail.

Judges Can Be Sued: Public Servants, Oaths, and Liability Under the Clearfield Doctrine AND 42 U.S.C. 1983

Judges Can Be Sued: Public Servants, Oaths, and Liability Under the Clearfield Doctrine AND 42 U.S.C. 1983

Judges are not immune when they operate outside lawful jurisdiction, conspire under color of law, or engage in commercial enforcement without consent. Under the Clearfield Doctrine, they become corporate actors subject to liability like any private party. 42 U.S.C. § 1983 enables civil rights lawsuits against them individually, while 18 U.S.C. §§ 241–242 provides for criminal penalties for conspiracy and deprivation of rights. Through tort law, UCC, and case law like Rankin v. Howard, 633 F.2d 844 (9th Cir. 1980), and Pulliam v. Allen, 466 U.S. 522 (1984), judges can face personal and injunctive accountability.

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.

error: Content is protected !!