Screen Shot 2025 07 08 at 9.35.01 PM

EMERGENCY PETITION FOR WRIT MANDAMUS VANISHES: Ninth Circuit Fraud, Tampering, Judicial Collusion, and a Federal Cover-Up Seems Unequivocal

Federal courts are now under scrutiny after a verified Writ of Mandamus vanished from the Ninth Circuit docket without explanation—raising grave concerns of judicial tampering, fraud, and systemic misconduct. Judge Sunshine Sykes defied clear jurisdictional divestiture by issuing rulings on a matter under appellate review, violating 28 U.S.C. § 144 and § 1651. This article exposes a disturbing pattern of ultra vires acts, denial of due process, and potential RICO violations implicating both district and appellate judges.Ask ChatGPT

In what appears to be a flagrant act of judicial misconduct, tampering, and constitutional subversion, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has inexplicably removed a verified and docketed Writ of Mandamus from its system—without any formal dismissal, sealed order, or notice to the Petitioners.

The Mandamus, filed June 24, 2025, under the All Writs Act (28 U.S.C. § 1651), challenged the ongoing judicial misconduct and statutory violations by U.S. District Judge Kenly Kiya Kato of the Central District of California. The Petition asserted Judge Kato’s disqualification was mandatory under 28 U.S.C. § 144 and § 455 after a verified motion and affidavit were filed alleging extrajudicial bias and conduct beyond judicial immunity. Under clear precedent—including Berger v. United States, 255 U.S. 22 (1921), and United States v. Sibla, 624 F.2d 864 (9th Cir. 1980)—the district judge was divested of jurisdiction and required by law to step down immediately.

Instead, Judge Kato continued to rule, issuing void orders in violation of federal law. After the Mandamus was filed and docketed in the Ninth Circuit (Case No. 25-3996), it disappeared from PACER without any formal disposition. This act is unprecedented, unlawful, and implies deliberate tampering or fraudulent concealment.

MANDAMUS VANISHES: Ninth Circuit Tampering, Judicial Collusion, and a Federal Cover-Up?

MANDAMUS VANISHES: Ninth Circuit Tampering, Judicial Collusion, and a Federal Cover-Up?

MANDAMUS VANISHES: Ninth Circuit Tampering, Judicial Collusion, and a Federal Cover-Up?

MANDAMUS VANISHES: Ninth Circuit Tampering, Judicial Collusion, and a Federal Cover-Up?

MANDAMUS VANISHES: Ninth Circuit Tampering, Judicial Collusion, and a Federal Cover-Up?

Sykes’ Unauthorized Interference

To make matters worse, U.S. District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes—who was referred the follow-up recusal motionignored the pending jurisdiction of the Ninth Circuit and issued a denial of the judicial disqualification on July 7, 2025. This act, taken while an Article III appellate court was seized of the very issue, is a direct violation of the divestiture rule, as affirmed in:

  • Clinton v. Goldsmith, 526 U.S. 529 (1999)

  • In re American Rivers, 372 F.3d 413 (D.C. Cir. 2004)

  • United States v. Claiborne, 727 F.2d 842 (9th Cir. 1984)

Once the Mandamus was filed, the District Court was divested of authority to act further on the matter. Yet Sykes proceeded—without jurisdiction—and thereby nullified both the statutory framework of § 144 and the integrity of the appellate process itself.

Pattern of Judicial Racketeering?

Taken together, the Ninth Circuit’s unexplained removal of a lawfully filed Writ, and the District Court’s continued issuance of void rulings after jurisdiction had passed to the appellate court, presents a clear pattern of:

  • Fraud upon the court

  • Obstruction of justice

  • Violation of 18 U.S.C. § 242 (deprivation of rights under color of law)

  • Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights (42 U.S.C. § 1985)

  • Racketeering activity under RICO (18 U.S.C. §§ 1961–1964)

Time to Hold the Judiciary Accountable

These actions have not only denied Kevin Realworldfare and Corey Walker their rights to an impartial tribunal and appellate redress—they have exposed the deeper systemic rot festering within the federal judiciary. If courts are now capable of erasing filings, defying jurisdictional transfers, and colluding in procedural fraud, then the rule of law itself has been compromised.

The American people deserve answers. Transparency. Integrity. And justice.

Stay tuned.

Leave your vote

4525232 points
More

Don’t Stop Here

More To Explore

Screen Shot 2025 07 08 at 9.35.01 PM

EMERGENCY PETITION FOR WRIT MANDAMUS VANISHES: Ninth Circuit Fraud, Tampering, Judicial Collusion, and a Federal Cover-Up Seems Unequivocal

Federal courts are now under scrutiny after a verified Writ of Mandamus vanished from the Ninth Circuit docket without explanation—raising grave concerns of judicial tampering, fraud, and systemic misconduct. Judge Sunshine Sykes defied clear jurisdictional divestiture by issuing rulings on a matter under appellate review, violating 28 U.S.C. § 144 and § 1651. This article exposes a disturbing pattern of ultra vires acts, denial of due process, and potential RICO violations implicating both district and appellate judges.Ask ChatGPT

lawful tender discharges the debt

When the Debt Is Discharged but the LIEN Remains: Why Auto and Home Loan Lenders Who Ignore Lawful Tender Are Committing Fraud and Commercial Crimes

This article delivers a devastating legal breakdown proving that lawful tender—once made and unrebutted—discharges auto loan debt under UCC §§ 3-601, 3-603, 3-310, 2-206, and 1-103, as codified in Cal. Com. Code §§ 3601, 3603, 3310, 2206, 1103, Fla. Stat. §§ 673.6011, 673.6031, 673.3101, 672.206, 671.103, and N.C.G.S. §§ 25-3-601, 25-3-603, 25-3-310, 25-2-206, 25-1-103. It exposes refusal to release a lien after lawful discharge as actionable fraud, conversion, embezzlement, and obstruction under state and federal law. With verified case law and commercial principles, it explains how silence equals acceptance and how creditors become commercially estopped. A must-read for secured parties, fiduciaries, and equity claimants demanding lien removal, declaratory relief, and commercial remedy.

Screen Shot 2025 06 28 at 4.55.33 PM

How a Perfected Security Agreement and UCC Filings Strip Servicers of Foreclosure Rights

A properly executed Security Agreement assigning all assets, rights, and interests to a private trust—paired with a UCC-1 financing statement and UCC-3 amendment claiming the Deed of Trust and Note—lawfully establishes the trust as the secured party and real party in interest. This perfected interest, under UCC §§ 9-203, 9-509, 3-301, and supported by controlling case law (e.g., Carpenter v. Longan, Ibanez, Veal), strips any servicer or third-party of standing to foreclose unless they possess the original Note, prove an unbroken chain of title, and rebut the trust’s perfected claim. Without that, all foreclosure attempts become void ab initio, commercial dishonor, and legal trespass on private trust property.

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.

error: Content is protected !!