From/By the people, for the people: How the U.S. Constitution Establishes 'Trust' and "Full Faith and Credit"

From/By the people, for the people: How the U.S. Constitution Establishes ‘Trust’ and “Full Faith and Credit”

Uncover how the principle of full faith and credit positions you as the true creditor behind the financial system. Dive into essential legal foundations such as the U.S. Constitution, 18 U.S.C. § 8, 31 U.S.C. § 5118, and the Gold Reserve Act of 1934, exposing how your trust and credit back all public obligations. Understand how the U.S. operates as a commercial entity under the Clearfield Doctrine, and how debts are lawfully discharged through the U.S. Treasury. Empower yourself with this knowledge and reclaim your rightful position within the system.

The phrase full faith and credit originates from Article IV, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution, which states:

“Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State. And the Congress may by general Laws prescribe the Manner in which such Acts, Records and Proceedings shall be proved, and the Effect thereof.”

While this applies directly to the recognition of state laws and judicial decisions, the broader principle extends to financial obligations—the foundation of the nation’s entire credit system.

Every dollar, every financial transaction, every government bond is backed by your productivity, your labor, and your collective credit. The government itself was created by the people and derives its legitimacy from you.

The Declaration of Independence and the Preamble to the U.S. Constitution confirm this:

“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

This means the government is nothing more than a trust—an entity serving the interests of the people, not the other way around.

Now, let’s talk about something the government won’t tell you—18 U.S.C. § 8. This federal statute defines obligation or other security of the United States to include Federal Reserve notes, bonds, and financial instruments. Meaning? Every financial obligation—public or private—is ultimately backed by the U.S. Treasury.

This aligns with House Joint Resolution 192 of 1933, which removed the gold standard and ensured debts would be discharged dollar for dollar in legal tender. Since there’s no real money—only credit—the system operates entirely on your trust and confidence.

And that’s reinforced by 31 U.S.C. § 5118, which states:

“The United States Government may not pay out any gold coin. A person lawfully holding United States coins and currency may not demand payment in gold coin.”

This law effectively means that all payments are made in legal tender, and there is no lawful way to demand a payment in substance—only in the credit-based system of Federal Reserve notes.

The Gold Reserve Act of 1934, Public Law 73-87, Title III, Section 3, further solidifies this principle by explicitly outlawing any obligation that requires payment in gold or a specific currency. It states:

“(a) Every provision contained in or made with respect to any obligation which purports to give the obligee a right to require payment in gold or a particular kind of coin or currency of the United States, or in an amount in money of the United States measured thereby, is declared to be against public policy.

(b) Every obligation, heretofore or hereafter incurred, shall be discharged upon payment, dollar for dollar, in any coin or currency which at the time of payment is legal tender for public and private debts.”

In Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States (1943), the Supreme Court ruled that when the government engages in commerce, it acts as a private corporation—not a sovereign power. That means when the U.S. deals in financial matters, it is bound by contract law and commercial regulations, just like any other corporate entity.

So, what does this mean for you?

It means that when the government imposes financial obligations or engages in commerce (courts, tickets, foreclosure proceedings, evictions, unlawful detainers, mortgages, auto loans, personal loans, you name it….

it’s doing so as a commercial player—not as an untouchable sovereign force.

Let’s bring this all together. Each American has full faith and credit because the government itself is a creation of the people. Its financial obligations are legally and commercially tied to you as the creditor. The U.S. Treasury ensures all debts are discharged, 31 U.S.C. § 5118 confirms there is no payment in gold, the Gold Reserve Act of 1934 makes it illegal to demand payment in a specific form of currency, and under the Clearfield Doctrine, the government functions as a corporate entity when engaging in commerce.

Knowledge is power. When you understand these principles, you take back control. You are not a debtor—you are the creditor. And the system is built on your full faith and credit.

Want to learn more about how to use this knowledge in your daily life? Like, subscribe, and stay tuned for more eye-opening episodes. Until next time—stay informed, stay empowered, and remember: you are the system, you power the system, and ignorance of the law is no excuse.

 

Leave your vote

3737392 points
More

Don’t Stop Here

More To Explore

Fraud, Color of Law, and RICO Violations by Attorney Monika Vermani (Bar #355080) Exposed in Riverside County, California

Fraud, Color of Law, and RICO Violations by Attorney Monika Vermani (Bar #355080) Exposed in Riverside County, California

Attorney Monika Vermani (CA Bar #355080) has been formally named in a high-level commercial fraud and racketeering operation involving Riverside County’s unlawful prosecution of a secured private trust estate. Verified affidavits, unrebutted notices, and perfected UCC filings establish that Vermani is proceeding without lawful jurisdiction, operating under color of law, and aiding in the unauthorized securitization and monetization of private estate assets. The record demands $100 million in damages, immediate dismissal with prejudice, and criminal prosecution under 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242, and 1961–1968 (RICO). This case exposes a systemic pattern of commercial fraud, identity theft, and administrative conspiracy masquerading as routine judicial process.

Attorney Monika Vermani (CA Bar #355080) has been formally named in a high-level commercial fraud and racketeering operation involving Riverside County’s unlawful prosecution of a secured private trust estate. Verified affidavits, unrebutted notices, and perfected UCC filings establish that Vermani is proceeding without lawful jurisdiction, operating under color of law, and aiding in the unauthorized securitization and monetization of private estate assets. The record demands $100 million in damages, immediate dismissal with prejudice, and criminal prosecution under 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242, and 1961–1968 (RICO). This case exposes a systemic pattern of commercial fraud, identity theft, and administrative conspiracy masquerading as routine judicial process.

252Is a U.S. Citizen an Authorized Representative of the United States?

Is a U.S. Citizen an Authorized Representative of the United States?

A U.S. citizen does not possess agency on behalf of the United States government unless expressly appointed by statute, contract, or lawful delegation. Mere citizenship does not establish authority to act for or represent the federal government in any legal or commercial capacity. In reality, the U.S. citizen is the governed and regulated party—operating under federal jurisdiction, not within it. Only properly delegated agents—such as public officers, attorneys, or fiduciaries acting under written authority—may speak or act on behalf of the United States. Recognizing this separation is essential in all matters involving legal standing, jurisdiction, and commercial equity.

2How to Convene a 12 Panel Grand Jury Citizen Authority vs. State Monopoly

How to Convene a 12-Panel Grand Jury: Citizen Authority vs. State Monopoly

Learn how private citizens can lawfully initiate grand jury investigations through both statutory and common law means. This article explains the difference between court-convened grand juries and citizen-led panels formed under First Amendment and natural law authority. From submitting affidavits to the U.S. Attorney under 18 U.S.C. § 3332(a), to organizing lawful assemblies that issue true bills, the guide walks through each step. It empowers those facing systemic fraud, corruption, or due process violations with a lawful path to remedy. Grand juries are not just for prosecutors—they are a tool for the people.

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.

error: Content is protected !!