252Is a U.S. Citizen an Authorized Representative of the United States?

Is a U.S. Citizen an Authorized Representative of the United States?

In the complex web of legal definitions, statuses, and commercial roles, few questions are more misunderstood than whether a U.S. citizen qualifies as an authorized representative of the United States. While mainstream belief often blurs the line between identity and agency, a closer look at statutory law, agency principles, and commercial reality reveals a sharp and critical distinction.

Original on Realworldfare 


⚖️ Legal Status of a “U.S. Citizen

Under 8 U.S.C. § 1401, a U.S. citizen is:

This status is created by statute and governs one’s participation in the federal franchise system—Social Security, IRS tax liabilities, passports, military draft, and other civil obligations. A U.S. citizen is, in essence, a beneficiary and subject of the corporate United States (see: United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898); 28 U.S.C. § 3002(15)United States as a “federal corporation”).


🛑 What Is an “Authorized Representative”?

An authorized representative is a legal agent empowered to act on behalf of a principal—typically by contract, statutory delegation, or written authorization. In the context of the United States government, an authorized representative includes:

  • Federal officers or employees acting under delegated authority,

  • Attorneys licensed to represent government interests,

  • Agents appointed via power of attorney or special commission,

  • Officers acting under military, civil, or diplomatic orders.

See relevant authorities:

  • Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 17(c) – Capacity to sue or be sued through representatives

  • 31 U.S.C. § 3729 – False Claims Act (qui tam “relators” acting as authorized agents of the United States)

  • 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b) – Privacy Act protections involving representatives

Without official appointment, contractual delegation, or a letter of authority, no person is presumed to be a representative of the United States.


⚠️ U.S. Citizens Are Not Automatically Agents of Government

Contrary to the assumption that “citizenship equals representation,” a U.S. citizen has no inherent agency relationship with the federal government. In fact:

  • The citizen is the regulated party, not the regulator.

  • The citizen is the subject, not the sovereign.

  • The citizen is the taxpayer and licensee, not the issuer of licenses.

A U.S. citizen is the end-user of services provided by the U.S. government’s corporate structure—not its legal or contractual representative. No lawful presumption of representation arises from citizenship alone.


🧾 The All-Caps NAME and the Real Representative

In commercial and equity law, the U.S. citizen NAME (in ALL CAPS) is treated as a legal fiction—an ens legis. It is:

  • A transmitting utility (see: UCC § 9-102),

  • A decedent estate or trust entity,

  • The debtor in virtually all commercial contracts with government agencies.

The living man or woman—properly styled in upper/lowercase—may act as the authorized representative of that legal fiction (e.g., under UCC 3-402, 3-501, or 1-103). But that is a private commercial relationship, not a federal appointment.

Thus, the only “authorized representative” role the average person may legally assume is representative of the ALL CAPS corporate entity the United States created for commercial administration—not of the United States itself.


✅ Final Word: No Representation Without Delegation

To be an authorized representative of the United States, one must:

  1. Hold a valid appointment, delegation, or commission;

  2. Act under specific statutory or regulatory authority;

  3. Operate in a fiduciary or agency role on behalf of the United States.

Absent such conditions, a U.S. citizen is not an agent of the United States, but rather its subject or its legal fiction’s beneficiary. Knowing the difference is essential in law, contracts, and courtrooms—because jurisdiction begins with status, and status determines standing.

Leave your vote

3523746 points
More

Don’t Stop Here

More To Explore

Fraud, Color of Law, and RICO Violations by Attorney Monika Vermani (Bar #355080) Exposed in Riverside County, California

Fraud, Color of Law, and RICO Violations by Attorney Monika Vermani (Bar #355080) Exposed in Riverside County, California

Attorney Monika Vermani (CA Bar #355080) has been formally named in a high-level commercial fraud and racketeering operation involving Riverside County’s unlawful prosecution of a secured private trust estate. Verified affidavits, unrebutted notices, and perfected UCC filings establish that Vermani is proceeding without lawful jurisdiction, operating under color of law, and aiding in the unauthorized securitization and monetization of private estate assets. The record demands $100 million in damages, immediate dismissal with prejudice, and criminal prosecution under 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242, and 1961–1968 (RICO). This case exposes a systemic pattern of commercial fraud, identity theft, and administrative conspiracy masquerading as routine judicial process.

Attorney Monika Vermani (CA Bar #355080) has been formally named in a high-level commercial fraud and racketeering operation involving Riverside County’s unlawful prosecution of a secured private trust estate. Verified affidavits, unrebutted notices, and perfected UCC filings establish that Vermani is proceeding without lawful jurisdiction, operating under color of law, and aiding in the unauthorized securitization and monetization of private estate assets. The record demands $100 million in damages, immediate dismissal with prejudice, and criminal prosecution under 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242, and 1961–1968 (RICO). This case exposes a systemic pattern of commercial fraud, identity theft, and administrative conspiracy masquerading as routine judicial process.

252Is a U.S. Citizen an Authorized Representative of the United States?

Is a U.S. Citizen an Authorized Representative of the United States?

A U.S. citizen does not possess agency on behalf of the United States government unless expressly appointed by statute, contract, or lawful delegation. Mere citizenship does not establish authority to act for or represent the federal government in any legal or commercial capacity. In reality, the U.S. citizen is the governed and regulated party—operating under federal jurisdiction, not within it. Only properly delegated agents—such as public officers, attorneys, or fiduciaries acting under written authority—may speak or act on behalf of the United States. Recognizing this separation is essential in all matters involving legal standing, jurisdiction, and commercial equity.

2How to Convene a 12 Panel Grand Jury Citizen Authority vs. State Monopoly

How to Convene a 12-Panel Grand Jury: Citizen Authority vs. State Monopoly

Learn how private citizens can lawfully initiate grand jury investigations through both statutory and common law means. This article explains the difference between court-convened grand juries and citizen-led panels formed under First Amendment and natural law authority. From submitting affidavits to the U.S. Attorney under 18 U.S.C. § 3332(a), to organizing lawful assemblies that issue true bills, the guide walks through each step. It empowers those facing systemic fraud, corruption, or due process violations with a lawful path to remedy. Grand juries are not just for prosecutors—they are a tool for the people.

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.

error: Content is protected !!