LOS ANGELES — May 6, 2025 — In a refreshing display of judicial honor and procedural integrity, Judge Wesley Hsu and Magistrate Judge Maria Audero of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California have rightfully acknowledged and docketed the VERIFIED Affidavit of Constitutional Authority, Supremacy Clause, and State Citizenship Status submitted by Kevin: Walker (now Kevin: Realworldare) in Case No. 5:25-cv-00646-WLH-MAA.
More notably, the Court has honorably backdated the filing to reflect its true date of receipt: April 30, 2025, as evidenced by USPS tracking and public proof of service (Tracking No. ER157615945US). This action reflects not only procedural correctness but good faith—a stark contrast to the misconduct seen in parallel proceedings.
This filing also unequivocally rebuts any false presumptions made in prior court communications, including those outlined in the ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, which falsely implied that Kevin: Realworldfare (formerly Kevin: Walker) was a “U.S. citizen,” “ward of the State,” “subject,” or “resident.” The affidavit and its exhibits reaffirm that Kevin stands as a State Citizen and national of the original Republic, with all associated unalienable rights and protections—not subject to corporate federal jurisdiction or administrative overlays.
A Stark Contrast to Prior Judicial Misconduct Under Jesus G. Bernal
The conduct of Judges Hsu and Audero sharply contrasts with that of Judge Jesus G. Bernal, who, in the separate matter Case No. 5:25-cv-00339, falsely claimed Kevin had never responded to motions—despite filed and timestamped responses. Bernal used this knowingly false assertion of “non-response” as a fraudulent basis to dismiss the case in direct violation of judicial ethics and due process. That case is currently on appeal, with Kevin citing clear evidence of record concealment and willful obstruction.
The affidavit — executed under penalty of perjury in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1746 — establishes Kevin: Walker’s status as a non-citizen national and State Citizen as recognized by 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(21)–(23). It rebuts presumptions of federal corporate jurisdiction, statutory adhesion, and compelled performance under commercial code. The filing also included comprehensive UCC filings, affidavits of non-residency, passport evidence, copyright/trademark protections, and notice of constitutional immunity.
Failure to properly acknowledge and record this filing potentially implicates the following U.S. Codes:
- 18 U.S.C. § 2071 – Concealment or removal of public records,
- 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c) – Obstruction of official proceedings,
- 18 U.S.C. § 241 – Conspiracy against rights,
- 18 U.S.C. § 242 – Deprivation of rights under color of law,
- 42 U.S.C. § 1983 – Civil action for deprivation of rights,
- 28 U.S.C. § 455 – Mandatory judicial disqualification where impartiality is reasonably questioned.
Confirmed Judicial Fraud and Conspiracy: Judge Jesus G. Bernal Conceals Affidavit, Notice, and Conditional Acceptance, and Dismisses Case In Chambers Under Color of Law
Faith Being Restored — One Filing at a Time
The actions of Judge Hsu and Magistrate Audero serve as a powerful example of how the federal judiciary can course-correct in real time. By simply doing what the law requires—acknowledging lawful filings, honoring dates of receipt, and refraining from political or corporate bias—they have set an early precedent for integrity in Walker’s litigation.
This is especially meaningful in a judicial landscape increasingly marred by corruption and abuse in Riverside County, where so-called “Commissioners” like Tamara G. Wagner, Jeremiah Raxter, Charles Johnson, and officials like District Attorney Michael Hestrin, Miranda Thomson, and Monika Vermani continue to operate under color of law, despite multiple filings alleging:
-
Kidnapping, coercion, and fraud,
-
Slander of title and obstruction of remedy, and
-
Criminal conspiracy and impersonation of judicial authority.
None of these individuals have taken any corrective or remedial action, and each remains under public scrutiny for their role in violating the rights of private American nationals and State Citizens.
Conclusion: A Sign of Hope Amid Widespread Corruption
By docketing the affidavit as received, and acknowledging the administrative and constitutional rights asserted, Judge Wesley Hsu and Magistrate Maria Audero have taken a principled stand that offers a measure of hope to all watching. While Riverside County continues to serve as a symbol of judicial decay, Hsu and Audero are showing that honor still exists within the federal bench—and that real justice begins with fidelity to process, record, and law.
As the broader legal battle continues, all eyes are now on whether this honorable pattern will be upheld—and whether others in the judiciary will follow suit, or fall further into complicity.
Criminal RICO Syndicate in Riverside County, California: How Lawyers Posing as “Judges,” Clerks, and Deputies Form an Ongoing Enterprise of Fraud, Obstruction, and Human Rights Violations — 42 USC 1984, 18 USC 241-242, RICO, Extortion and more
Judicial Railroading and Fraud in Riverside, California: Attorney/Fake Fraudulent “Judge”/Commissioner Tamara L. Wagner (CA Bar #188613) Named in RICO-Based Federal Removal for Practicing Law from the Bench and Orchestrating Fraudulent Proceedings
