The Kevin Walker Estate has taken decisive legal action against what it describes as judicial fraud, conspiracy, and obstruction of justice within the United States District Court, Central District of California, Eastern Division. Despite filing a Verified Notice of Judicial Fraud, the court has failed to acknowledge it, further solidifying allegations of intentional misconduct and procedural bad faith.
Obstruction of Key Legal Filings: A Blatant Violation of Due Process
A Verified Affidavit of Constitutional Authority, Supremacy Clause, American Sovereignty, Federal Jurisdiction, National/Non-Citizen National (State Citizen) Status, Estate Claim, and Rebuttal of All Legal Presumptions was submitted twice for filing, yet court personnel have deliberately obstructed and concealed it from the record. This calculated action violates due process, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Constitution itself.
In addition, the PLAINTIFFS’ VERIFIED NOTICE OF JUDICIAL FRAUD, CONSPIRACY, DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW, VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS, AND WAR AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION AND THE PEOPLE has also been suppressed, despite being lawfully submitted and received.
The court’s refusal to process these legally binding documents while simultaneously pushing forward fraudulent hearings demonstrates a knowing and deliberate conspiracy to obstruct justice. This is further confirmed by the scheduling of an unconstitutional hearing despite Plaintiffs’ lawful objections and unrebutted affidavits barring further proceedings.
Sham Proceedings Scheduled Despite Lack of Jurisdiction
The scheduled hearing in Case No. 5:25-cv-00339 is a clear violation of established legal doctrines that prohibit further litigation on settled matters, including:
1️⃣ Res Judicata – The matter has already been adjudicated and cannot be relitigated.
2️⃣ Stare Decisis – The court must adhere to binding precedent.
3️⃣ Collateral Estoppel – Defendants are barred from raising arguments already defeated.
4️⃣ Unrebutted Affidavits – Per Maxims of Law and UCC § 3-505 (Evidence of Dishonor), unrebutted affidavits stand as truth in commerce and law.
🔹 PACER Monitor Case Link: Kevin Walker Estate v. Jay Promisco, Sierra Pacific Mortgage Co.
Despite these legal barriers preventing any further proceedings, Judge Jesus G. Bernal and the Riverside Federal Court have refused to cancel the hearing, exposing their unconstitutional actions and direct violation of due process.
Fraudulent Actions Confirm the Government’s Unlawful Conduct
By concealing critical filings, obstructing due process, and moving forward with a non-consensual, unconstitutional hearing, the Riverside Federal Court is affirming the following:
✅ The government is knowingly committing judicial fraud and acting outside the law.
✅ The court is participating in a conspiracy to obstruct justice.
✅ Proceedings are being conducted without jurisdiction or lawful authority.
✅ Any resulting orders, rulings, or judgments are void ab initio (null from inception).
📜 The Clearfield Doctrine (Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States, 318 U.S. 363) establishes that when the government operates in commerce, it is bound by commercial law and loses sovereign immunity. By refusing to docket legal filings while proceeding with fraudulent hearings, the court is engaged in contract violations, obstruction of justice, and procedural fraud.
📜 United States v. Throckmorton, 98 U.S. 61 (1878) – “Fraud vitiates everything it touches.” Any court order issued through fraudulent proceedings is void and unenforceable.
📜 Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803) – “A law repugnant to the Constitution is void.” The court’s actions contradict fundamental constitutional protections, making its rulings legally null.
In addition, the PLAINTIFFS’ VERIFIED NOTICE OF JUDICIAL FRAUD, CONSPIRACY, DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW, VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS, AND WAR AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION AND THE PEOPLE has also been suppressed, despite being lawfully submitted and received.
Fraudulent Proceedings Rescheduled to 03/31/2025: Further Proof of Judicial Malfeasance
The initial sham hearing in Case No. 5:25-cv-00339 was originally set for March 24, 2025. Rather than canceling the unauthorized, unconstitutional, and fraudulent proceedings, the court has now rescheduled the hearing for March 31, 2025.
This move further confirms that the court is willfully participating in fraud, conspiracy, and deprivation of rights under color of law.
📌 This delay serves no lawful purpose but instead:
✅ Attempts to create the illusion of legitimate proceedings where none exist.
✅ Provides the court additional time to fabricate procedural justifications for its fraud.
✅ Obstructs and conceals the fact that summary judgment and default judgment are due as a matter of law.
✅ Forces Plaintiffs into an unconstitutional cycle of litigation that violates due process and res judicata.
The Kevin Walker Estate has already provided unrebutted affidavits, a Verified Notice of Judicial Fraud, and demands for summary judgment—all of which legally bar any further hearings or proceedings. Yet, instead of upholding its ministerial duty, Judge Jesus G. Bernal and the Riverside Federal Court continue their unconstitutional charade.
📌 By rescheduling an already fraudulent hearing, the court has confirmed that it is engaging in:
✅ Procedural bad faith
✅ Obstruction of justice
✅ A conspiracy to deprive Plaintiffs of their constitutional rights
Pacermonitor link: https://www.pacermonitor.com/case/56782287/Kevin_Walker_Estate_et_al_v_Jay_Promisco_et_al
Screen Shot 2025 03 22 at 6.10.18 PM
Legal Consequences and Next Steps
If the court refuses to cancel the sham hearing and issue summary judgment as required by law, it will:
🔹 Confirm its role in conspiracy and deprivation of rights under color of law (18 U.S.C. § 242).
🔹 Be liable for obstruction of justice and fraud upon the court.
🔹 Face criminal referrals, sanctions, and judicial oversight investigations.
The Kevin Walker Estate will not participate in this fraudulent proceeding and will escalate this matter to:
1️⃣ Federal appellate courts for immediate intervention.
2️⃣ The Department of Justice for criminal referrals.
3️⃣ Judicial oversight bodies for sanctions against Judge Jesus Bernal.
4️⃣ International human rights organizations for systemic due process violations.
Conclusion: Fraud Cannot Stand in Law
The Riverside Federal Court’s refusal to docket key filings, coupled with its continued pursuit of an illegitimate hearing, exposes it as an agent of judicial fraud. Fraud vitiates everything it touches, and as case law has consistently affirmed, any ruling based on fraud is void and unenforceable (United States v. Throckmorton, 98 U.S. 61).
📌 The Kevin Walker Estate demands immediate judicial accountability—and any further unlawful actions will be met with aggressive legal and federal enforcement measures.
The People are watching. History will record whether this court upholds the law or exposes itself as a corrupt entity defying the Constitution.
