Oath Over Freedom How Politicians Surrender Natural Rights to Serve the Corporate State

Oath Over Freedom: How Politicians Surrender Natural Rights to Serve the Corporate State

When a politician accepts public office, they operate under a different legal capacity — no longer as a private State Citizen with unalienable rights, but as a U.S. citizen bound to statutory obligations. Their oath of office contracts them into fiduciary duty, placing them under administrative and commercial law, not common law. This transition subordinates natural rights in favor of public trust obligations. Under doctrines like Clearfield Trust and UCC § 1-201(27), politicians act as agents of the corporate UNITED STATES and are subject to public policy, not sovereign authority. In essence, holding office means operating as a trustee of the public, not a free individual.

when a politician assumes office and acts as a public official, they waive or subordinate certain natural rights in favor of public duties and statutory obligations. Here’s a breakdown:


1. U.S. Citizen vs. State Citizen (Private vs. Public Capacity)

  • A natural person or State Citizen holds unalienable rights (natural rights) by birth.

  • A U.S. citizen, as defined in the 14th Amendment and federal codes (see 26 U.S.C. § 7701, 28 U.S.C. § 3002), is a subject of federal jurisdiction — effectively a legal fiction (a trust, corporation, or public franchise).


2. Politicians Voluntarily Enter Public Office

  • They swear an oath of office — binding them to uphold statutes, rules, and constitutions.

  • By doing so, they operate in a public trust capacity, subject to:

    • Administrative procedure.

    • Commercial liability (under Clearfield Doctrine).

    • Federal statutes, codes, and public policy.


3. Legal Consequences of Taking Office

  • They become public officers, meaning:

    • They no longer act in their private sovereign capacity while performing their duties.

    • They are agents of the corporate entity — the “UNITED STATES” or the STATE OF [X].

  • This means they effectively surrender or suspend their natural rights while operating in that office — not in their personal life (unless fully contracted into the public system).


4. Relevant Doctrines and Citations

  • Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States, 318 U.S. 363 (1943) — once the government enters commerce, it descends to the level of a private corporation and loses sovereign immunity.

  • UCC 1-201(27) — public officers are fiduciaries and debtors by role.

  • Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742 (1970) — waiver of constitutional rights must be knowing, voluntary, and intelligent — politicians do this via oath.


Summary

Yes, when a politician accepts public office:

  • They act in a public/commercial capacity, not a private sovereign one.

  • They contract away the free exercise of some natural rights while in office, functioning instead under statutes, policies, and corporate code.

  • They become part of the public trust, and are liable under fiduciary and administrative law, not common law.

Leave your vote

9383822 points
More

Don’t Stop Here

More To Explore

Judicial Integrity in Action: Judge Wesley Hsu and Magistrate Maria Audero Honorably Uphold Due Process in Kevin: Walker vs Chad Bianco RICO and 42 U.S.C. 1983 Case

Judicial Integrity in Action: Judge Wesley Hsu and Magistrate Maria Audero Honorably Uphold Due Process in Kevin: Walker vs Chad Bianco RICO and 42 U.S.C. 1983 Case

Judge Wesley Hsu’s and/or Magistrate Maria Audero’s Court took a significant step toward restoring judicial integrity by docketing and honorably backdating Kevin: Realworldfare’s VERIFIED Affidavit asserting State Citizenship and constitutional standing in case 5:25-cv-00646-WLH-MAA. This filing directly rebuts prior false presumptions labeling him a U.S. citizen or ward of the State. In contrast to prior judicial misconduct by Judge Jesus G. Bernal, who obstructed identical filings, Hsu and Audero’s actions demonstrate procedural fidelity and impartiality. Their conduct marks a hopeful departure from the systemic corruption plaguing courts in Riverside County. The case highlights growing public scrutiny and demand for lawful adjudication based on record, not presumption.

Affidavit Delivered to Judge Wesley Hsu's Court in Kevin Walker vs Chad Bianco Remains Undocketed — Delay or Concealment? Benefit of the Doubt Extended, For Now

Affidavit Delivered to Judge Wesley Hsu’s Court in Kevin Walker vs Chad Bianco Remains Undocketed — Delay or Concealment? Benefit of the Doubt Extended, For Now

This article exposes a troubling pattern of judicial misconduct in California’s federal courts, where verified affidavits asserting State Citizenship and national status have been received but concealed from the official record. Specifically, it highlights the nondocketing of a key affidavit in Kevin: Walker v. Bianco et al. before Judge Wesley Hsu, while extending temporary benefit of the doubt due to possible administrative backlog. The article also touches on and reconfirms how Judge Jesus G. Bernal falsely claimed non-response in a related case to justify an unlawful dismissal, now under appeal. These actions collectively suggest systemic obstruction, due process violations, and potential criminal liability under multiple federal statutes.

Jurisdiction Citizenship and Federal Zones The Truth Behind Wong Kim Ark and the Buck Act of 1940

Jurisdiction, Citizenship, and Federal Zones: The Truth Behind Wong Kim Ark and the Buck Act of 1940

This article explores the crucial legal distinctions between a State Citizen and a U.S. citizen (14th Amendment subject) by analyzing the Supreme Court case Wong Kim Ark v. United States and the jurisdictional implications of the Buck Act of 1940. It reveals how federal jurisdiction is not based on geography, but on consent and contractual participation in federal benefit programs. Through detailed legal reasoning, it explains how one can owe allegiance to the United States as a constitutional Republic without being subject to its corporate statutory codes. The piece provides actionable remedies for rebutting federal presumptions and restoring lawful State Citizenship.

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.

error: Content is protected !!