Criminal RICO Syndicate in Riverside County, California: How Lawyers Posing as “Judges,” Clerks, and Deputies Form an Ongoing Enterprise of Fraud, Obstruction, and Human Rights Violations — 42 USC 1984, 18 USC 241-242, RICO, Extortion and more

Organized Judicial Racketeering in Southern California: How Attorneys Masquerading as Judges Collude with Clerks and Sheriffs to Perpetrate Fraud, Extortion, and Civil Rights Violations Under Color of Law

This exposé reveals a coordinated RICO enterprise operating within Riverside County’s justice system, naming Sheriff Chad Bianco, DA Michael Hestrin, Commissioner Tamara L. Wagner, and others for systemic fraud, extortion, and deprivation of rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. It further exposes U.S. District Judge Jesus G. Bernal for judicial obstruction and record concealment, constituting willful interference in violation of federal due process. Backed by an active federal RICO lawsuit under 18 U.S.C. § 1962 before Judge Wesley Hsu, the article outlines a pattern of racketeering, forged instruments, false filings, and unlawful evictions. Officials including Pam Bondi, Rob Bonta, Kash Patel, and the FBI have been formally notified but remain silent. This is not isolated misconduct—it is organized crime under color of law. The piece stands as both public notice and evidentiary documentation for further federal action.

Read on Realworldfare.com

🧨 A Courtroom Cartel in Broad Daylight

What’s happening in Riverside County, California is not simply misconduct — it is a coordinated criminal operation operating behind the thin disguise of government. This is not hyperbole. This is organized crime committed by a ring of rogue public officials and licensed actors colluding in clear violation of the U.S. Constitution, California law, and multiple federal criminal statutes.

This network functions as a RICO enterprise — knowingly obstructing justice, filing false documents, denying filings, depriving rights, enforcing unlawful evictions, and laundering property through fraudulent court actions.

And now the curtain is being pulled back.


💥 Key Actors in the Criminal Enterprise in Riverside County, California 

Chad Bianco, Riverside Officials in Active RICO Default, Owing $1,000,000,000 While Running for Governor – Verified Commercial Dishonor Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 18 U.S.C. §§ 241 and 242

Chad Bianco, Riverside Officials in Active RICO Default, Owing $1,000,000,000,000 While Running for Governor – Verified Commercial Dishonor Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 18 U.S.C. §§ 241 and 242

🔴 Chad Bianco – Riverside County Sheriff

Chad Bianco is not protecting the public — he is the head enforcer of a RICO structure already being litigated in federal court. Alongside his deputies, he has orchestrated unlawful raids, kidnappings, vehicle theft, and civil rights violations with impunity. These actions are now subject to active federal litigation before Judge Wesley Hsu under claims of racketeering, conspiracy, obstruction, and deprivation of rights.

✅ Bianco is already named in a pending federal RICO lawsuit alongside:

  • Miranda Thomson (Court enforcer),

  • District Attorney Michael Hestrin, and

  • Multiple Riverside County deputies.

48492EBC00000578 5285723 Riverside District Attorney Michael Hestrin was emotional and so m 32 1516312208092 1590516935

🔴 Michael Hestrin – District Attorney

DA Hestrin is a central actor in this criminal network. Despite overwhelming public record evidence of official corruption, fraudulent documents, illegal property seizures, and due process violations, Hestrin has refused to prosecute a single official. His silence, in the face of crimes committed under oath and in public view, confirms his role as protector of the enterprise — not the people.

Riverside County Retaliation, RICO, and Fraud: Verified Affidavits Confirm Fraud, RICO, and Constitutional Violations by Riverside County’s Michael Hestrin and Miranda Thomson and Riverside County Sheriff

Riverside County Retaliation, RICO, and Fraud: Verified Affidavits Confirm Fraud, RICO, and Constitutional Violations by Riverside County’s Michael Hestrin and Miranda Thomson and Riverside County Sheriff

Screen Shot 2025 04 30 at 10.04.46 AM

🔴 Miranda Thomson – Color-of-Law Enforcer

Operating under the guise of court enforcement, Thomson has repeatedly used sheriff resources to execute unlawful evictions and retaliatory seizures, even when federal removal is in effect. She is already named in the same federal RICO action pending in U.S. District Court, facing claims of abuse of power, extortion, and rights deprivation.

Screen Shot 2025 04 30 at 10.04.46 AM

🔴 Tamara L. Wagner – Fraudulent Bench Actor

Tamara Wagner is not a judge — she is a commissioner acting without jurisdiction. She has unlawfully presided over cases, ruled against litigants without verified complaints or jurisdiction, ignored federal removal stays, and actively practices law from the bench — all while lacking Article III standing. Her orders are void ab initio, and she has no immunity for acts outside lawful authority.

Judicial Railroading and Fraud: Tamara L. Wagner (CA Bar #188613) Named in RICO-Based Federal Removal for Practicing Law from the Bench and Orchestrating Fraudulent Proceedings in Riverside County

Judicial Railroading and Fraud in Riverside, California: Attorney/Fake Fraudulent “Judge”/Commissioner Tamara L. Wagner (CA Bar #188613) Named in RICO-Based Federal Removal for Practicing Law from the Bench and Orchestrating Fraudulent Proceedings

 

 

Public Notice of Criminal Enterprise, RICO Violations, and Systematic Fraud Committed by Charles Rogers, Jeremiah D. Raxter, and Monika Vermani in Riverside County

 

🔴 Jeremiah Raxter – No Active BAR License

Raxter presides over hearings without a valid BAR license, impersonating a judicial officer in direct violation of state and federal law. This is felony-level impersonation and renders all actions he touches null and void.

🔴 Charles Roger – Invalid BAR Status

Roger continues to act in legal matters despite not having a valid license to practice law in California. His rulings, statements, and legal influence constitute unauthorized practice of law and compound the fraud.

🔴 Monika Vermani – BAR #355080 – Fraud by the Pen

Monika Vermani, a licensed attorney, is directly involved in filing fraudulent pleadings, ignoring verified filings, failing to rebut commercial notices, and advancing fictitious instruments in court. Her participation is both civilly actionable and criminally indictable.

Screen Shot 2025 04 30 at 10.04.46 AM

🔴 Jackie Prendergast – Clerk of Court, Agent of Obstruction

As Clerk of Court, Jackie Prendergast has refused to accept filings, unlawfully rejected verified documents, and interfered with record entry and case assignment. These acts are a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2071 (concealing and altering public records) and are clear evidence of systemic obstruction of justice.

Court Clerk Jackie Prendergast and the Unconstitutional RICO Cartel Controlling Riverside County Courts

Court Clerk Jackie Prendergast and the Unconstitutional RICO Cartel Controlling Riverside County Courts

Jesus G Bernal -- confirmed fraud, RICO, judicial fraud and corruption

🔴 Jesus G. Bernal – Article III Judge Turned Obstructionist

Judge Jesus G. Bernal has willfully engaged in what can only be described as judicial sabotage of the federal record. Despite having Article III authority, Bernal ignored multiple unrebutted affidavits, including conditional acceptances, verified notices of criminal violations, and sworn demands for judgment. More dangerously, he deliberately concealed from the docket Plaintiffs’ filings — such as the Verified Conditional Acceptance, the Demand for Summary Judgment, and multiple sworn notices served via Registered Mail with PS Form 3811 confirmations.

Rather than address the merits, Bernal issued a summary dismissal claiming Plaintiffs “failed to respond” — despite irrefutable proof of timely, verified responses being both filed and served. This constitutes record tampering, violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2071, and suppression of evidence under 18 U.S.C. § 1512.

Worse, Bernal falsely labeled the Plaintiffs’ claims as “sovereign citizen theories” — a known slur used to deflect and discredit any party asserting contractual, equitable, or commercial rights. This defamatory act, devoid of legal basis, is itself a violation of judicial ethics and a color-of-law deprivation under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

Despite being an Article III judge sworn to uphold the Constitution, Bernal ignored UCC § 3-505, Federal Rule 56, and unrebutted affidavits, all while protecting corporate defendants with no standing and no verified claims. These actions are not errors. They are deliberate, documented, and subject to appeal, federal sanction, and exposure.

Judge Bernal is not confused — he is complicit.

Confirmed Judicial Fraud and Conspiracy: Judge Jesus G. Bernal Conceals Affidavit, Notice, and Conditional Acceptance, and Dismisses Case In Chambers Under Color of Law

Confirmed Judicial Fraud and Conspiracy: Judge Jesus G. Bernal Conceals Affidavit, Notice, and Conditional Acceptance, and Dismisses Case In Chambers Under Color of Law


🚨 Federal and State Authorities Have Been Notified — and Remain Silent

This network has already been reported and documented to multiple high-level officials and agencies, including:

  • Pam Bondi, U.S. Attorney General

  • ✅ Kash Patel, FBI Director

  • California Attorney General Rob Bonta

  • The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

  • U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division

  • U.S. Marshals Service and the Office of the Inspector General

All were formally served or notified, and none have acted to halt the fraud. Their silence is not just neglect — it is seemingly complicity.


⚖️ Statutory Violations Committed by This Enterprise

 

Code Violation
18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Rights
18 U.S.C. § 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law
18 U.S.C. § 1962 RICO – Racketeering Influenced Corrupt Organizations Act
18 U.S.C. § 1341/1343 Mail and Wire Fraud
18 U.S.C. § 872 Extortion Under Color of Official Right
18 U.S.C. § 1503 Obstruction of Justice
18 U.S.C. § 513 Forged Instruments
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Action for Rights Violations
California Penal Code § 115 Filing False or Forged Documents
California Civil Code § 1709 Fraud and Deceit
California Penal Code § 518 Extortion
California Government Code § 1227 Fraudulent Recording in Official Records

🧷 The Pattern is Clear: This Is a Criminal Cartel

This group is not simply corrupt — they are coordinated, complicit, and actively engaged in a conspiracy to:

  • Strip individuals of lawful title and rights,

  • Abuse law enforcement resources,

  • Ignore federal supremacy under 28 U.S.C. § 1446(d),

  • Retaliate against whistleblowers and secured parties,

  • Enrich themselves or third-party corporations via unlawful takings.


🧨 The Public Must Demand Justice

Every recorded action, ignored notice, blocked filing, and unlawful ruling compounds the legal exposure and eliminates judicial immunity.

If this operation continues unchecked, it will:

  • Undermine all due process in California,

  • Wipe out trust in public institutions,

  • And validate the use of government for criminal enterprise.


📣 Call to Action:

  1. Demand immediate investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice and FBI RICO Unit.

  2. File judicial complaints against Tamara Wagner and Jeremiah Raxter with the California Commission on Judicial Performance.

  3. File civil rights lawsuits under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and § 1985.

  4. Issue public affidavits, notices of claim, and liens against personal assets under lawful commercial procedures.

  5. Spread this article and evidence far and wide. Force exposure.


Justice is not a courtesy. It is a right. And when public servants become predators, the people must respond with facts, law, and relentless exposure.

This enterprise is exposed. The record is built. And the reckoning is coming.

Leave your vote

3523622 points
More

Don’t Stop Here

More To Explore

Screen Shot 2025 07 08 at 9.35.01 PM

EMERGENCY PETITION FOR WRIT MANDAMUS VANISHES: Ninth Circuit Fraud, Tampering, Judicial Collusion, and a Federal Cover-Up Seems Unequivocal

Federal courts are now under scrutiny after a verified Writ of Mandamus vanished from the Ninth Circuit docket without explanation—raising grave concerns of judicial tampering, fraud, and systemic misconduct. Judge Sunshine Sykes defied clear jurisdictional divestiture by issuing rulings on a matter under appellate review, violating 28 U.S.C. § 144 and § 1651. This article exposes a disturbing pattern of ultra vires acts, denial of due process, and potential RICO violations implicating both district and appellate judges.Ask ChatGPT

lawful tender discharges the debt

When the Debt Is Discharged but the LIEN Remains: Why Auto and Home Loan Lenders Who Ignore Lawful Tender Are Committing Fraud and Commercial Crimes

This article delivers a devastating legal breakdown proving that lawful tender—once made and unrebutted—discharges auto loan debt under UCC §§ 3-601, 3-603, 3-310, 2-206, and 1-103, as codified in Cal. Com. Code §§ 3601, 3603, 3310, 2206, 1103, Fla. Stat. §§ 673.6011, 673.6031, 673.3101, 672.206, 671.103, and N.C.G.S. §§ 25-3-601, 25-3-603, 25-3-310, 25-2-206, 25-1-103. It exposes refusal to release a lien after lawful discharge as actionable fraud, conversion, embezzlement, and obstruction under state and federal law. With verified case law and commercial principles, it explains how silence equals acceptance and how creditors become commercially estopped. A must-read for secured parties, fiduciaries, and equity claimants demanding lien removal, declaratory relief, and commercial remedy.

Screen Shot 2025 06 28 at 4.55.33 PM

How a Perfected Security Agreement and UCC Filings Strip Servicers of Foreclosure Rights

A properly executed Security Agreement assigning all assets, rights, and interests to a private trust—paired with a UCC-1 financing statement and UCC-3 amendment claiming the Deed of Trust and Note—lawfully establishes the trust as the secured party and real party in interest. This perfected interest, under UCC §§ 9-203, 9-509, 3-301, and supported by controlling case law (e.g., Carpenter v. Longan, Ibanez, Veal), strips any servicer or third-party of standing to foreclose unless they possess the original Note, prove an unbroken chain of title, and rebut the trust’s perfected claim. Without that, all foreclosure attempts become void ab initio, commercial dishonor, and legal trespass on private trust property.

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.

error: Content is protected !!