™WALKERNOVA GROUP©
We are a private educational and administrative support firm focused on matters involving Constitutional rights, private and public law distinctions, secured transactions, trust and estate structuring, negotiable instruments, and lawful remedy under equity, contract, and commercial law.
Our areas of concentration include State Citizenship, national status clarification, lawful trust and contract administration, UCC-based filings, private banking principles, estate planning, foreclosure defense strategies, and lawful documentation involving trusts, deeds, securities, and equity interests.
We believe that rights must be lawfully asserted to be preserved, and that the distinction between rights, privileges, and benefits is critical. Every day, individuals are subjected to actions taken under color of law due to widespread misunderstanding of legal terminology, contract enforcement, and the operation of legal fictions.
We help clarify the proper use and interpretation of commonly misunderstood terms such as:
individual, person, financial institution, national, state Citizen, U.S. citizen, secured party, attorney-in-fact vs. attorney-at-law, and more—ensuring that lawful standing and private rights are clearly distinguished from statutory presumptions.
FEATURED VIDEOS
LATEST NEWS
Using IRS Forms 3949-A and 211 to Expose Organized Crime, Corrupt Judges, Clerks, Courts, and Financial Misconduct
Corruption within the judicial system, including fraudulent accounting, improper banking practices, and organized crime, poses a severe threat to justice and financial stability. Fortunately, whistleblowers have powerful tools at their disposal to report such misconduct to the Department of the Treasury – Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Two of the most effective mechanisms for exposing financial fraud involving corrupt courts, clerks, judges, and officials are IRS Form 3949-A (Information Referral) and IRS Form 211 (Application for Award for Original Information).
The Redefinition of U.S. Currency: The Impact of the Emergency Banking Act, HJR 192, Title 31 U.S. Code, and Constructive Expansion Policy
The U.S. financial system underwent a monumental transformation due to the Emergency Banking Act of 1933, House Joint Resolution 192 (HJR 192), and key provisions of Title 31 U.S. Code, including 31 U.S.C. § 3123, § 5118, and § 5103. These legislative acts, combined with the Constructive Expansion Policy established by Congress on March 9, 1933, fundamentally reshaped the nature of currency and debt obligations in the United States. This shift not only dismantled the gold standard but also recognized negotiable instruments—including bills of exchange, bonds, and acceptances—as legal currency.
“citizen of the United States”: A ‘legal fiction’ Born from the Fourteenth (14th) Amendment
The concept of citizenship in the United States is more complex than commonly understood. Legal precedents and statutory definitions reveal a critical distinction between a "state Citizen" (also referred to as a "national") and a "citizen of the United States." This article explores this distinction, highlighting key legal authorities, statutory provisions, and judicial opinions to clarify the implications for individuals seeking to understand their legal status and rights
Article III Courts: Protecting Equity, Enforcing Affidavits, and Upholding Rights
Article III courts, established under the U.S. Constitution, are essential for protecting rights in civil contract disputes involving unrebutted affidavits. They uphold due process guaranteed by the Constitution, recognize uncontested evidence, and offer both legal and equitable remedies. With exclusive equity jurisdiction, these courts can enforce obligations, issue injunctions, and affirm binding agreements, ensuring justice and constitutional compliance
Foundational “Case Law” on Standing, Mortgage Fraud, Foreclosure, Corporate Overreach, and Affidavits
This case law summary outlines essential legal principles regarding jurisdiction, standing, and procedural requirements in financial and mortgage disputes. Courts consistently invalidate judgments lacking proper jurisdiction and stress the necessity for plaintiffs to establish legal standing. Instances of fraudulent lending practices, including breaches of federal regulations, have resulted in dismissals with prejudice. Rulings curtail corporate overreach by banks, prohibiting lending credit and ultra vires contracts. Evidentiary standards highlight the importance of adequate affidavits and the duty to disclose information to prevent fraud. Contract principles reaffirm the voiding of agreements founded on illegal consideration.
Jurisdictional Implications and Differences: “Pro Se” and “Pro Per”
"Pro Se" denotes voluntarily representing oneself within the court’s jurisdiction, thereby consenting to its authority and procedures. In contrast, "Pro Per" allows individuals to assert their personal status and directly challenge the court’s jurisdiction, avoiding representation as a legal fiction. This distinction underscores the significance of an Affidavit of Power of Attorney In Fact, which empowers an Attorney In Fact to represent a trust without requiring a licensed attorney in the public jurisdiction. Understanding these legal roles is crucial in navigating court standing and asserting constitutional and contractual rights effectively.
Bill of Exchange ‘Evidenced’ as “Currency” by 31 USC 5118, 12 USC 412, UCC 3-601, 3-603, 3-311, and HJR 192 of 1933 (public law 73-10)
Under statutes, codes, and public policy, bills of exchange are legally recognized as currency since they discharge debt obligations in commerce. HJR 192, 31 USC 5118, and 12 USC 412 establish that debt instruments have replaced gold as legal payment. UCC provisions (3-603, 3-311, and 3-601) affirm that presenting a bill of exchange settles debts, even if rejected.
Riverside County Sheriff in Default and All Allegations now Admitted and Confirmed Facts including Racketeering, Conspiracy, Kidnapping, Coercion, Extortion, and more in Trillion Dollar ‘Right to Travel’ Lawsuit
The Riverside County Sheriff’s Department, including Deputies Gregory D. Eastwood, Robert C. V. Bowman, William Pratt, and George Reyes, stands in legal default for failing to respond to a formal notice of conditional acceptance and affidavit from Kevin Walker. Under contract law, common law, and principles of fairness, an unrebutted affidavit is deemed conclusive truth. The Sheriff’s Department’s lack of response now confirms all allegations against them as true and legally binding. By their own failure to respond and express silent agreement, the Sheriff’s Department has tacitly admitted to allegations of fraud, racketeering, identity theft, extortion, coercion, and conspiracy to deprive rights under the color of law. This result stems from their refusal to comply with the required legal processes under UCC § 3-505, which presumes dishonor in such circumstances.
YouTube’s Complicity in Attacks on American Rights: Van Ballion and Law Talks with Mike’s Campaign of Defamation and Misinformation
Van Ballion (Nigel Turner), a UK-based content creator, and Michael J. Gravlin, an attorney at law behind the channel Law Talks with Mike, are accused by critics of actively undermining the constitutional rights of Americans. Their content spreads misinformation, misrepresents legal concepts, and wages smear campaigns against non-citizen nationals/nationals and state Citizens who assert their lawful rights and expect Constitutional security and protection. Michael Gravlin’s role as an officer of the court raises concerns about ethical violations, as his platform reportedly labels Americans with disparaging terms such as "Sov Cits" to maliciously disprage and undermine their legal advocacy. Van Ballion, despite lacking ties to the U.S. legal system, interferes in American civic discourse through malicious, dispraging, and harmful commentary. The KEVIN WALKER ESTATE is now preparing to sue YouTube, Turner, and Gravlin for malicious defamation, libel, and conspiracy to undermine lawful discourse, conspiracy and racketerring against the people of America. Americans seeking to protect their rights or who have been defamed are encouraged to assert their rights and seek redress.
The Deceptive Tactics of Banks and Lawyers/Attorneys at Law: A Breakdown of Common Legal Evasions
In legal proceedings, some parties may resort to deceptive tactics to avoid addressing the actual issues at hand. These tactics include dismissing valid arguments with vague, unsupported claims like “baseless” or “meritless” and avoiding engagement with evidence or legal references. Instead of addressing the facts, the opposing side might use emotional language, misrepresent your position, or shift the burden of proof onto you. These strategies are often employed to distract from the lack of a solid defense or to obscure the weakness of their own case. Recognizing these behaviors can help you stay focused on the core legal issues and ensure that the dispute is resolved based on merit.
SDCCU, Sheppard Mullin, Michael D Starks, and Blake Partridge are actively Waging War Against the Constitution and the American People
The Constitution of the United States serves as the bedrock of our nation, guaranteeing unalienable rights, due process, and the supremacy of the people over the government. Yet, Sheppard Mullin, Shannon Peterson, and Blake Partridge, Junior Partner at Sastre, Saavedra & Epstein, PLLC, have demonstrated through their actions that they stand in direct opposition to these foundational principles. Their conduct represents a calculated assault on constitutional protections and the sovereignty of the American people, effectively waging war against the Constitution and its intended purpose.
Judge Roy K Altman’s Blatant Bias and Undermining of the the U.S. Constitution, the UCC, and HJR 192
In recent legal proceedings, Judge Altman’s handling of critical commercial and financial laws has raised serious concerns. His dismissal of key sections of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) and essential federal statutes, such as House Joint Resolution 192 and 18 U.S.C. § 8, undermines the integrity of the U.S. legal system. These laws are foundational to understanding the complex interplay of U.S. monetary policy, debt discharge, and commercial transactions. In this article, we will dissect the significant legal missteps in Judge Altman’s ruling, exploring the implications for commercial law, government debt obligations, and the broader judicial system.
SERVICES & PRODUCTS
BOOKS, DOCUMENTS, RESOURCES
-
Explanation of the 1099 OID and the 1040V (Voucher) An What Impact It Has On Your Alleged Income Tax Liability by UNKNOWN
Read more -
MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF 1099OID – ORIGINAL ISSUE DISCOUNT
$0.00 Add to cart -
One Man Out – United States, Securities, Redemption and Fraud
$0.00 Add to cart -
(Signed Copy) The AFFIDAVIT OF WALKER TODD – MORTGAGE FRUAD, SWAP, MONEY OF ACCOUNT AND MONEY OF EXCHANGE
$0.00 Add to cart -
Affidavit of Revocation & Termination of Franchise
$150.00 Add to cart -
SECRETS OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER
$0.00 Add to cart -
The Real 13th Amendment: WYOMING
$0.00 Add to cart -
The Real 13th Amendment: MAINE
$0.00 Add to cart -
The Real 13th Amendment: COLORADO
$0.00 Add to cart -
USING YOUR EXEMPTION
$0.00 Add to cart -
THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATE OF AMERICA
$0.00 Add to cart -
The Exemption by Moses G. Washington revised on 10/19/2004
$0.00 Add to cart
For Smart visionaries
Embrace the Wisdom of Time and Money
In the pursuit of your dreams, remember that money is but a means to an end, a tool in your hands to craft the life you envision. Invest it wisely, not just in financial endeavors, but in experiences that enrich your soul. Time, the most precious currency, is the foundation of your journey. Allocate it with care, for it is the true measure of wealth. Seize each moment, for in its passage lies the essence of a life well-lived. Let your pursuits be guided by purpose, and may every resource at your disposal serve to enhance the tapestry of your existence.
