equity

Perfected Claim, Perfected Remedy: How to Enforce Your Rights After Foreclosure

Equity is a parallel legal system grounded in conscience, fairness, and moral justice, developed to address the limitations and rigidity of common law. It offers remedies where legal (monetary) relief is insufficient—such as injunctions, constructive trusts, and specific performance. Equity acts upon the person rather than the property (in personam), and is guided by enduring maxims, including: “He who comes into equity must come with clean hands” and “Equity regards as done that which ought to be done.” It ensures that rights are enforced not merely by law, but by what is just and honorable.

Here’s how that can be done if proper and factually supported: Sourced on Realworldfare


🔑 1. Establish Standing with a Security Interest (UCC Article 9)

  • File a UCC-1 Financing Statement naming yourself (or your trust/estate) as Secured Party, and the party claiming ownership (bank, servicer, trustee, etc.) as the Debtor.

  • Reference the property address, deed of trust, and mortgage note as collateral.

  • Cite relevant authority:

    • UCC § 9-105 (control of deposit accounts)

    • UCC § 9-607 (right to collect, enforce, or dispose of collateral)

This puts the world on notice that you are asserting a legal and equitable lien and intend to enforce your claim over any proceeds or title interest.


🧾 2. Perfect the Equitable Claim via Affidavit

  • Draft an Affidavit of Security Interest & Equitable Claim, signed under penalty of perjury.

  • State:

    • You provided the original instrument or value (note, down payment, etc.)

    • The foreclosure was fraudulent, procedurally defective, or violated due process.

    • You are the Holder in Due Course (UCC § 3-302) with rights to the note or contract.

    • That all funds or proceeds from the foreclosure must be accounted for and returned.

Attach:

  • UCC-1 Filing

  • Deed/Note copy

  • Proof of payments

  • Affidavit of prior tender or conditional acceptance (if applicable)


⚖️ 3. Invoke Equity and Trust Principles

  • In equity, he who has the beneficial interest is the true owner.

  • If the trustee or servicer never proved true party in interest, or failed to rebut your claim, then their action may be void.

  • UCC § 3-603 provides that tender discharges the obligation if not returned or dishonored.

If you can show:

Then your equity position is restorable by law.


💰 4. Claim Proceeds, Surplus, or Title

Once you’ve perfected the claim:

  • Demand an accounting of all proceeds.

  • File a Notice of Equitable Claim or Lis Pendens in the county.

  • If the foreclosure deed is voidable, pursue:

    • Quiet Title Action

    • Claim for Constructive Trust

    • Restitution of Possession

If the property has been sold:

  • You can still pursue the proceeds from the sale, especially if you had a superior claim or if fraud was involved.


🏁 Summary

✅ File UCC-1 to perfect your lien
✅ Assert your equity through affidavit and notice
✅ Prove tender or unrebutted performance
✅ Challenge any unlawful foreclosure through equity and commercial law
✅ Seek return of the home or proceeds through court or administrative remedy

Leave your vote

3937231 points
More

Don’t Stop Here

More To Explore

What a California Court Commissioner Really Is and how Charles Rogers Jeremiah Raxter are Engaged in RICO and Felonies in Riverside California 1 1

Riverside, California: What a California Court Commissioner Really Is and how Fraudulent “Commissioner” Charles Rogers, Jeremiah Raxter are Engaged in RICO and Felonies

Charles Rogers (Bar #64530) and Jeremiah D. Raxter (Bar #276811) are engaged in an ongoing scheme of judicial fraud and racketeering in Riverside County, California. Both individuals are inactive members of the California State Bar and have no lawful authority to act as judges or commissioners. Their acts — including issuing bench warrants, signing orders, and presiding over court matters — are void ab initio and constitute federal felonies under 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242, and 1962. Their actions represent a criminal enterprise under color of law, demanding immediate investigation, disbarment, and prosecution. Public notice is hereby given that all their proceedings are fraudulent and without legal force.

Criminal RICO Syndicate in Riverside County, California: How Lawyers Posing as “Judges,” Clerks, and Deputies Form an Ongoing Enterprise of Fraud, Obstruction, and Human Rights Violations — 42 USC 1984, 18 USC 241-242, RICO, Extortion and more

Organized Judicial Racketeering in Southern California: How Attorneys Masquerading as Judges Collude with Clerks and Sheriffs to Perpetrate Fraud, Extortion, and Civil Rights Violations Under Color of Law

This exposé reveals a coordinated RICO enterprise operating within Riverside County’s justice system, naming Sheriff Chad Bianco, DA Michael Hestrin, Commissioner Tamara L. Wagner, and others for systemic fraud, extortion, and deprivation of rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. It further exposes U.S. District Judge Jesus G. Bernal for judicial obstruction and record concealment, constituting willful interference in violation of federal due process. Backed by an active federal RICO lawsuit under 18 U.S.C. § 1962 before Judge Wesley Hsu, the article outlines a pattern of racketeering, forged instruments, false filings, and unlawful evictions. Officials including Pam Bondi, Rob Bonta, Kash Patel, and the FBI have been formally notified but remain silent. This is not isolated misconduct—it is organized crime under color of law. The piece stands as both public notice and evidentiary documentation for further federal action.

RICO-Fueled Courtroom Corruption in Riverside: Attorney Tamara L. Wagner Implicated for Fraud and Abuse of Office

RICO-Fueled Courtroom Corruption in Riverside: Attorney Tamara L. Wagner Implicated for Fraud and Abuse of Office

Tamara L. Wagner (CA Bar #188613), a licensed attorney acting as a judicial officer in Riverside County, is now at the center of a federal removal action citing judicial fraud, civil rights violations, and RICO conspiracy. Defendants allege she is unlawfully practicing law from the bench without constitutional authority, advancing proceedings in open dishonor. Verified affidavits, UCC filings, and summary judgment demands were ignored, leading to claims of railroading and systemic court corruption. The case, removed under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1441, 1443, and 1446, is now pending in federal court.

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.

error: Content is protected !!