In a disturbing act of judicial overreach and procedural sabotage, U.S. District Judge Otis D. Wright II of the Central District of California has doubled down on misconduct, fraud, and denial of rights under color of law—unilaterally striking multiple verified filings and foreclosing a properly removed federal civil rights case, while branding the undersigned Petitioner with the slur “sovereign citizen,” a term notoriously used to defame private Americans asserting constitutional rights.
The facts are not in dispute.
On May 12, 2025, I filed a civil rights removal under 28 U.S.C. § 1443(1), removing a state-level matter based on verified deprivation of rights and constitutional violations. This is an express and lawful path recognized by the U.S. Supreme Court in Georgia v. Rachel, 384 U.S. 780 (1966). My filing included a full record of unrebutted affidavits, perfected UCC financing statements, and verified notices demonstrating commercial dishonor, fraudulent prosecution, and absence of any real party in interest.
The case was never a criminal matter. There is no indictment. No verified complaint. No charging instrument. And no corpus delicti.
Yet on July 9, 2025, Judge Wright issued an “Order Striking Removal”, falsely citing 28 U.S.C. § 1455—a statute that applies only to criminal prosecutions—and ordered a remand back to the same state court that had been shown to lack jurisdiction. This is not just legal error. It is fraud. It is obstruction. And it is treasonous conduct from the bench.
To compound the injury, on July 10, 2025, after I lawfully filed an Emergency Verified Motion to Strike and Vacate the Void Order, along with multiple verified affidavits, judicial notices, and jurisdictional filings, Judge Wright issued another order—striking everything.
Not just denying review—striking the filings entirely.
No hearing.
No findings of fact.
No acknowledgment of the controlling civil rights statute.
No procedural analysis.
Instead, the court declared the case “closed” and vowed to accept “no further filings.”
This is not judicial discretion.
This is not a legal ruling.
This is tyranny under color of law.
This court was never vested with subject matter jurisdiction. It never held a hearing. It ignored every jurisdictional challenge, rejected every affidavit, and unlawfully substituted a fictitious party—“United States of America”—into a case originally filed as The People of the State of California v. Kevin Lewis Walker. The fabricated substitution, combined with the rejection of due process filings, is a textbook case of fraud on the court.
The unlawful striking of verified filings without adjudication violates the First Amendment right to petition, the Fifth Amendment right to due process, and the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The repeated refusal to even acknowledge the true nature of the case—while falsely calling the petitioner a “sovereign citizen”—constitutes libel, prejudice, and actionable defamation by a judicial officer.
Furthermore, this obstruction has now been elevated to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit by Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus, seeking to vacate the void order, dismiss the action entirely, and compel reassignment to a neutral, Article III judge.
Judge Wright’s actions are not merely erroneous—they are criminal under 18 U.S.C. §§ 241 and 242 (conspiracy against rights and deprivation of rights under color of law), and they call for immediate investigation under 28 U.S.C. § 372(c) for judicial misconduct, abuse of authority, and obstruction of justice.
This is not just my case.
This is the systemic collapse of due process.
If federal judges can silence verified filings, strike records at will, ignore jurisdictional statutes, fabricate parties, and smear American nationals asserting rights—then there is no republic, no law, and no justice.
What remains is administrative tyranny in black robes.
Let this article serve as a formal record, a warning to the public, and a call to action.
Fraud voids all. Treason from the bench is still treason.
