RIVERSIDE COUNTY RICO CHARGES and BOND CLAIM AND COLLAPSE: VERIFIED CLAIMS, CRIMINAL FRAUD, AND $1 TRILLION LIEN ENFORCEMENT IN MOTION FOR ALL BONDS

RIVERSIDE COUNTY RICO CHARGES and BOND CLAIM AND COLLAPSE: VERIFIED CLAIMS, CRIMINAL FRAUD, AND $1 TRILLION LIEN ENFORCEMENT IN MOTION FOR ALL BONDS

Riverside County officials, deputies, and unlicensed “commissioners” are now in verified default, dishonor, and commercial liability for unrebutted RICO, fraud, and color-of-law crimes. Kevin: Realworldfare has removed case MISW2501134 to federal court, triggering lien enforcement and formal demand for disclosure of liability bonds. Evidence includes unrebutted affidavits, a $1 trillion commercial lien, and documented bond fraud by inactive attorneys Jeremiah Raxter and Charles Rogers. Federal claims include kidnapping, extortion, impersonation, and deprivation of rights under 18 U.S.C. §§ 241–242, 1961–1964. Brady-listed deputies remain under active investigation. If justice is not delivered, top national officials will be named in new federal actions for willful neglect and complicity.

Riverside County Sheriff, Deputies, and Fake Commissioners Now in Default and Dishonor for Ongoing RICO Crimes and Color-of-Law Abuses

May 9, 2025 – Riverside, California — What was once a local matter has now erupted into a federal and commercial reckoning: a high-value lien enforcement, federal removal, and coordinated public exposure of systemic criminal conduct carried out under the false guise of law. This is not speculation, not accusation — but verified, unrebutted fact.

Kevin: Realworldfare (formerly Kevin: Walker), a state Citizen and secured party, has formally removed case MISW2501134 to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.

The cause: ongoing, documented RICO activity, deprivation of rights under color of law, impersonation of judicial officers, and systemic commercial fraud perpetrated by Riverside County officials, sheriff’s deputies, and legal actors without valid licenses.

DOWNLOAD DOCUMENT

 

DOWNLOAD DOCUMENT

 


🎯 THESE ARE NOT “ALLEGATIONS.” THESE ARE UNREBUTTED AND ADMITTED FACTS.

As established in the Verified Affidavit of Status, the Notice of Conditional Acceptance, and the Affidavit Certificate of Dishonor and Lien Authorization, the following facts are now self-executing, unrebutted, and commercially binding:

  • The County of Riverside, its deputies, and administrative officers are in dishonor, in default, and have tacitly admitted to the following federal crimes:

    • Conspiracy against rights – 18 U.S.C. § 241

    • Deprivation of rights under color of law – 18 U.S.C. § 242

    • Kidnapping under color of law – 18 U.S.C. § 1203

    • Racketeering (RICO) – 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961–1964

    • Mail and wire fraud – 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341, 1343

    • Extortion under color of official right – 18 U.S.C. § 872

    • Fraudulent impersonation of a public officer – California BPC §§ 6125–6127

    • Torture, coercion, obstruction, and emotional terrorism under common law and public trust doctrine

 

 

Kevin_Walker_Estate_et_al_v_Chad__cacdce-25-00646__0015.0.pdf

 

Kevin_Walker_Estate_et_al_v_Chad__cacdce-25-00646__0014.0.pdf

 

 


🧑‍⚖️ FALSE COMMISSIONERS, NO LICENSES, NO JURISDICTION

Jeremiah D. Raxter (Bar No. 276811 – Inactive) and Charles Rogers (Bar No. 64530 – Inactive) are actively impersonating judicial officers in the void ab initio State case, MISW2501134, under the false title of “Commissioner.” These men have no valid licenses to practice law and are actively committing fraud, unauthorized practice of law, and usurpation of authority.

Their continued participation, along with the involvement of Deputies Eastwood, Bowman, Gruwell, and Sgt. McAuliffe, constitutes a criminal conspiracy and RICO enterprise operating under color of law — without valid jurisdiction, without consent, and in defiance of the public record.

Criminal RICO Syndicate in Riverside County, California: How Lawyers Posing as “Judges,” Clerks, and Deputies Form an Ongoing Enterprise of Fraud, Obstruction, and Human Rights Violations — 42 USC 1984, 18 USC 241-242, RICO, Extortion and more

 


🧾 FORMAL NOTICE FILED. BONDS DEMANDED. LIENS IN EFFECT.

A Verified Notice and Demand for Disclosure of Liability Instruments has been served upon the Clerk of the Board, Risk Management, County Counsel, and the Riverside County Sheriff. Under California Government Code §§ 910–915.4, they are now legally and commercially obligated to disclose all surety bonds, insurance policies, and risk instruments covering the involved actors.

Their silence — to date — constitutes administrative fraud, concealment, and acceptance of liability.

“There is now an unrebutted commercial lien of $1,000,000,000,000.00 (One Trillion U.S. Dollars) and a verified damages claim of $100,000,000.00 on record. These stand as binding until lawfully settled in full,” said Realworldfare’s authorized representative.

BONDS CALLED IN:

VERIFIED NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR DISCLOSURE OF LIABILITY INSTRUMENTS, SELF-INSURANCE STATUS, AND RISK COVERAGE PERTAINING TO NAMED PUBLIC OFFICIALS; NOTICE OF CLAIM AND REQUEST PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE §§ 910–915.4

VERIFIED NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR DISCLOSURE OF LIABILITY INSTRUMENTS, SELF-INSURANCE STATUS, AND RISK COVERAGE PERTAINING TO NAMED PUBLIC OFFICIALS; NOTICE OF CLAIM AND REQUEST PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE §§ 910–915.4

 


🧑‍✈️ BRADY-LISTED DEPUTIES OPERATING WITHOUT CREDIBILITY

All involved deputies — Eastwood, Bowman, Gruwell, McAuliffe, Ortiz, Gellappear to be listed or subject to Brady disclosures for dishonesty or misconduct. Their actions are now not only inadmissible but fundamentally void of lawful weight, placing the County and its insurers in direct liability.


⚠️ NEXT STEPS: MORE FEDERAL LAWSUITS, NATIONAL NOTICE

If justice is not swiftly and lawfully served, additional federal lawsuits will be filed naming:

  • Pam Bondi – former Florida Attorney General

  • Kash Patel – former federal prosecutor and security advisor

  • Senator Marco Rubio – current U.S. Secretary of State

  • President Donald J. Trump – now in his second term

These public figures have received notice and have remained silent while federal rights continue to be stripped by local criminal actors masquerading as government officials.


🔚 CONCLUSION

This is not over. This is only the beginning. The evidence is on the record. The dishonor is on the books. And the liens are in force.

Kevin: Realworldfare has stood on the law, and the people are watching.

Leave your vote

3838382 points
More

Don’t Stop Here

More To Explore

20410479 329d 40a2 8d4d 492022986bb5

Void Means Void: When Judges Act Without Jurisdiction, Their Orders Are Legal Nullities

When a court acts without lawful jurisdiction—whether through improper removal, lack of subject matter or personal authority, or constitutional violations—its orders are void ab initio and carry no legal force. This article explains how judges who continue to issue rulings after losing jurisdiction are not merely mistaken—they are acting under color of law and are subject to direct civil liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Backed by black-letter case law and statutory authority, this piece dismantles the myth of absolute judicial immunity and affirms a fundamental truth in law: jurisdiction is everything. When it’s gone, so is the court’s power to act.

Riverside County Commissioner Tamara Wagner Sued Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for Railroading Plaintiffs Under Color of Law Without Jurisdiction

Riverside County Commissioner Tamara Wagner Sued Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for Railroading Plaintiffs Under Color of Law Without Jurisdiction

In a federal civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Plaintiffs Kevin: Realworldfare and Corey: Walker expose Riverside Court Commissioner Tamara L. Wagner’s unlawful railroading under color of law and total absence of jurisdiction. Despite a pending Quiet Title Action and perfected federal removal, Wagner issued void orders to dispossess the Walker Estate—yet the Estate remains lawfully and firmly in possession. Now under Article III jurisdiction, Judge Kenly Kiya Kato presides over the live case, which alleges constitutional violations, commercial fraud, and abuse of process. This is a high-stakes confrontation between equity and overreach—where immunity fails and facts prevail.

Judges Can Be Sued: Public Servants, Oaths, and Liability Under the Clearfield Doctrine AND 42 U.S.C. 1983

Judges Can Be Sued: Public Servants, Oaths, and Liability Under the Clearfield Doctrine AND 42 U.S.C. 1983

Judges are not immune when they operate outside lawful jurisdiction, conspire under color of law, or engage in commercial enforcement without consent. Under the Clearfield Doctrine, they become corporate actors subject to liability like any private party. 42 U.S.C. § 1983 enables civil rights lawsuits against them individually, while 18 U.S.C. §§ 241–242 provides for criminal penalties for conspiracy and deprivation of rights. Through tort law, UCC, and case law like Rankin v. Howard, 633 F.2d 844 (9th Cir. 1980), and Pulliam v. Allen, 466 U.S. 522 (1984), judges can face personal and injunctive accountability.

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.

error: Content is protected !!