Riverside Sheriff Deputy Sgt. Harding (#3120), RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER, and Rep Krista Collude to DeFraud Riverside County Americans

Riverside County Sheriff & RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT are INTENTIONALLY Violating the Rights of Americans

As per 42 United States Code § 408 – Penalties, it is a felony for ANYONE to compel the use of a social security number.

42 U.S. Code § 408(a)(8) – Penalties explicitly states:

(a)In general, Whoever

(8) discloses, uses, or compels the disclosure of the social security number of any person in violation of the laws of the United States; or
(9) conspires to commit any offense described in any of paragraphs (1) through (4), shall be guilty of a felony and upon conviction thereof shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned for not more than five years, or both, except that in the case of a person who receives a fee or other income for services performed in connection with any determination with respect to benefits under this subchapter (including a claimant representative, translator, or current or former employee of the Social Security Administration), or who is a physician or other health care provider who submits, or causes the submission of, medical or other evidence in connection with any such determination, such person shall be guilty of a felony and upon conviction thereof shall be fined under title 18, or imprisoned for not more than ten years, or both.

Despite this blatant obviousness Riverside Sherriff Chad Bianco is instructing deputies like sergeant Harding (Bade #3120) to refuse to file viable and substantiated fraud and identity theft claims, and Riverside Sheriff is aiding Rancho California Water District in stealing from the Riverside County people.  Without permission and against express written revocation of any presumed authorization to use a social security number, Rancho California Water District is acting against express instructions and blatantly committing fraud and stealing the information of Americans.

This obvious identity fraud, fraud, coercion, deprivation under the color of law, conspiracy to deprive, robbery, extortion, trust impeding commerce and trade, and treason is being allowed to continue by Riverside Sheriff County.

A national of the United States/non-citizen national/foreign official/official guest that resides in the de’jure Republic, and a private citizen of Temecula, California, has a Trust that has an account with Rancho California Water District.

Upon contacting the Riverside Sheriff to file a fraud complaint they were denied the option to file a fraud and theft report by Deputy Harding (Badge #3120), the national of the United State/non-citizen national, acting as a trustee for the Estate, was told a fraudulent lie by Deputy Harding, that Rancho California Water District can use their information and the social security number assigned to the Legal Fiction/Franchise/Ens Legis/Trust without their permission, and against the trustee’s denial of permission and express revocation of any presumed permission, and in direct conflict with the U.S. Code and Constitution

In this situation, Deputy Harding (badge #3120) is either misinformed or informed and guilty of conspiring against a national of the United States.

Furthermore, the Trustee tendered payment in full satisfaction, per Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) § 3-603, 3-311, the Bills of Exchange Act, and House Joint Resolution 192 of June 5 1933 public law 73-10. Rancho California Water District disregarded the Law, spit on the Constitution, stuck the middle finger to the Uniform Commercial Code and the United States Code, and refused to honor the payment tendered in full satisfaction.

By these treasonous action Rancho California Water District completely disregards the Law they unscrupulously, intentionally, willfully continue their fraud, extortion, coercion, deprivation of rights under the color of law, the conspiracy, they are in possession of ill gotten gains, and receive(d) extortion proceeds.

Deputy Harding refused to file report for the national/non-citizen national, clearly affirming he was not going to assist, so we will explain the situation here so he can read it all in clear articulate form. 🙂

 

Riverside County Sheriff & RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT are INTENTIONALLY Violating the Rights of Americans

Riverside County Sheriff & RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT are INTENTIONALLY Violating the Rights of Americans

 

MAJOR ISSUES, VIOLATIONS OF THE LAW, DEPRIVATION, INFRINGEMENTS, UNLAWFUL AND ILLEGAL ACTIONS:

  1. Employee(s) and/or Agent(s) like “Krista” and “Nathan” of Rancho California Water District refuse to cease the infringement and cease using the proprietary information and intellectual property (social security number, common law trademarked and copyright).
  2. In direct violation of 18 U.S. Code § 880 – Receiving the proceeds of extortion, Rancho California Water District and its Agent(s) and Fiduciary(ies) is/are extorting nationals/ non-citizen nationals of their FRNs (Dollars), assets, identity, securities, money, and wealth and Rancho California Water District is thus receiving extortion proceeds. This is in direct violation of 18 U.S. Code § 880 – Receiving the proceeds of extortion, which states that violators deemed guilty shall be imprisoned not more than 3 years, fined under this title, or both.
  3. Denying the national/non-citizen national the right to close the Account and to continue to extort the national and use intellectual property without permission, is a direct and willful violation of 18 U.S. Code § 878 – Threats and extortion against foreign officials, official guests, or internationally protected persons, which carries a punishment of a fine or imprisonment not more than twenty years, or both, except that imprisonment for a threatened assault shall not exceed three years
  4. When opening an account with Rancho California Water District a trust is created (constructive trust, executory trust, involuntary trust, or other) and they use that trust in restraint of trade and commerce, which is a direction violation of, 15 U.S. Code § 1 – Trusts, etc., in restraint of trade illegal.   The U.S. Code stipulates that those deemed guilty shall be deemed guilty of a felony, and, on conviction thereof, shall be punished by fine not exceeding $100,000,000 if a corporation, or, if any other person$1,000,000, or by imprisonment not exceeding 10 years, or by both said punishments, in the discretion of the court.
  5. In direct violation of 42 U.S. Code § 408(a)(8), Rancho California Water District uses the social security number they do not have permission to use.
  6. Rancho California Water District “under the color of law” is depriving nationals/non-citizen nationals in violation of, 18 U.S. Code § 242 – Deprivation of rights under color of law, punishable by a fine under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
  7. Rancho California Water District “under the color of law” and in conspiracy with others (like the Sheriff, Rancho Employees, Deputies) and Riverside County Sheriff are seemingly willfully, intentionally, and treasonously violating 18 U.S. Code § 241 – Conspiracy against rights, which is punishable by fine or ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
  8. By doing the above there is monopolization of trade and commerce and that is a direct vioaltion of, 15 U.S. Code § 2 – Monopolizing trade a felony; penalty, and punishable by fine not exceeding $100,000,000 if a corporation, or if any other person $1,000,000, or by imprisonment not exceeding 10 years, or by both said punishments, in the discretion of the court.
  9. UCC 3-603 is very clear. If tender of payment of an obligation to pay an instrument is made to a person entitled to enforce the instrument and the tender is refused, there is discharge, to the extent of the amount of the tender. By keeping the Bill of Exchange tendered as payment for full satisfaction and refusing to adjust the Account ledger, Rancho California Water District has thus stolen the Bill of Exchange and is continuing to extort the national/non-citizen national by demanding more payment.
  10. UCC 3-311 states that a claim is discharged if the person against whom the claim is asserted proves that the instrument (Bill of Exchange, Promissory Notes, Money Order, Check, etc.) or an accompanying written communication contained a conspicuous/obvious statement to the effect that the instrument was “tendered” as “full satisfaction” of the claim.

 

IN SUMMARY:

Rancho California Water District is actively, willfully, and intentionally committing fraud, stealing, extorting, coercing, swindling, and depriving of Americans of their rights, and forcing them into a state of peonage/slavery.

This being done to Americans is treason.

Leave your vote

More

Don’t Stop Here

More To Explore

PHH Mortgage Corporation's Motion to Dismiss in Kevin Walker Estate, et al. v. PHH Mortgage Corporation, et al. is a glaring example of procedural misconduct, constitutional violations, and a deliberate attempt to obstruct justice. The Plaintiffs have conditionally accepted PHH Mortgage’s non-compliant filing, thereby tendering a binding counteroffer that PHH must now rebut. PHH’s continued silence and failure to rebut the conditional acceptance further compounds their non-performance and dishonor. Additionally, the Defendants’ filing violates multiple-defendant court rules, misrepresents the law, displays incompetence and a war against the Constitution, and constitutes blatant obstruction of justice.

KEVIN WALKER ESTATE’S Conditional Acceptance Exposes PHH Mortgage’s Motion as Procedurally Defective, Deceitful and Dishonest, Unconstitutional, and Legally Void

PHH Mortgage Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss in Kevin Walker Estate, et al. v. PHH Mortgage Corporation, et al. is a glaring example of procedural misconduct, constitutional violations, and a deliberate attempt to obstruct justice. The Plaintiffs have conditionally accepted PHH Mortgage’s non-compliant filing, thereby tendering a binding counteroffer that PHH must now rebut. PHH’s continued silence and failure to rebut the conditional acceptance further compounds their non-performance and dishonor. Additionally, the Defendants’ filing, prepared by Neil J. Cooper of HOUSER LLP, violates multiple-defendant court rules, misrepresents the law, displays incompetence and a war against the Constitution, and constitutes blatant obstruction of justice.

Further exacerbating this obstruction, critical documents remain missing from the court docket and record, preventing a full and fair adjudication of the Plaintiffs’ claims. This deliberate suppression of filings by the court and Defendants undermines due process, conceals key evidence, and constitutes judicial misconduct. The failure to properly record and acknowledge Plaintiffs’ filings further demonstrates systematic efforts to manipulate the proceedings in PHH Mortgage’s favor, reinforcing the need for immediate judicial correction, sanctions, and enforcement of Plaintiffs’ default judgment demands.

Judicial Misconduct in Riverside, California: Defendant PHH Mortgage's ("loan servicer") Baseless Motion and the Court’s Obstruction of Justice

Judicial Misconduct in Riverside, California: Defendant PHH Mortgage’s (“loan servicer”) Baseless Motion and the Court’s Obstruction of Justice

PHH Mortgage’s Motion to Dismiss in Kevin Walker Estate, et al. v. PHH Mortgage Corporation, et al. exemplifies judicial overreach, procedural abuse, and a blatant disregard for constitutional rights. The motion falsely asserts that a trust cannot be represented by an attorney-in-fact, denying individuals their right to self-representation and claiming that only "attorneys at law" can act in court. This contradicts established legal principles, including the American Bar Association’s recognition of power of attorney as a legitimate instrument granting broad authority. Additionally, the court has obstructed the record by refusing to file Plaintiffs’ documents, prompting a writ of mandamus to expose the Riverside Federal Court’s misconduct. This case underscores a broader pattern of legal corruption, defamation, and deprivation of rights under the color of law.

Screen Shot 2025 02 19 at 1.22.22 PM

KEVIN WALKER Estate Demands Writ of Mandamus as Riverside Federal Court Engages in Corruption, Record Tampering, and Obstruction of Justice

The United States District Court, Central District of California (Riverside), stands accused of obstructing justice, tampering with records, and violating due process by unlawfully refusing to file and docket legitimate pleadings. Plaintiffs KEVIN WALKER ESTATE, et al., hav presented irrefutable evidence of judicial misconduct, calling for criminal prosecution, sanctions, and immediate enforcement. Despite proof of receipt, court officials have concealed filings, manipulated records, and obstructed legal proceedings, in direct violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1505, 1512, 1519, and 2071. With Pam Bondi CC’d on the correspondence, high-level authorities have been alerted to this grave constitutional violation that threatens judicial integrity and fundamental rights.

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.

error: Content is protected !!