The mortgage indsutry is a huge scam

The Dirty Mortgage Secret: The Borrower’s Right to Their Promissory NOTE and the CASH VALUE

The journey of a mortgage promissory note from a simple contractual agreement to a complex financial instrument is shrouded in layers of banking procedures rarely disclosed to the average borrower. This article aims to demystify how mortgage companies securitize promissory notes and the little-known fact that all mortgage borrowers have an inherent claim to these notes which have CASH VALUE of your total loan amount and often even more—a claim often lost in the fog of inadequate disclosure and double ledger banking practices.

 

The Securitization Process:

Securitization—the act of transforming loans into securities—begins with a borrower signing a promissory note, which represents a promise to pay back the borrowed amount with interest. This note is a powerful financial tool that, unbeknownst to many signers, becomes a cog in the wheel of a larger economic machine.

Jean Keating How the mortgage industry is fraudulent and borrowers are Double Paying

The Unseen Value of Promissory Notes:

Upon signing, these promissory notes are recorded as an asset on the lender’s books. What borrowers are not typically told is that this asset entry is mirrored by a cash value entry, effectively creating a financial balance that is not directly acknowledged on the lender’s publicly disclosed financial statements.

 

Behind the Banking Veil:

In the labyrinth of commercial banking, the creation of a loan simultaneously generates an equal and opposite ledger entry. This practice, often obscured from the borrower, means that the bank considers the loan to be ‘paid’ from an accounting standpoint the moment the promissory note is signed and valued.

 

The Hidden Claim:

Every borrower, by virtue of their signed promissory note, holds aN ownership and claim to it. Yet, due to the opaque nature of financial disclosures and the complexities of commercial banking, most never exercise this right. The promissory note, once signed, is frequently sold to a trust or Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV), which then issues securities backed by these notes. The capital generated from selling these securities to investors is rarely, if ever, credited back to the borrower.

This is because borrowers never actually make claim, due to lack of disclosure.

a Promissory Note is actually a assets with cash value given cash is just actually DEBT. THER IS NO MONEY

A Case for Transparency and Action:

The lack of transparency in disclosing these financial maneuvers to borrowers raises serious ethical concerns. A borrower should be aware that their signed note has been commodified and that they hold a potential claim over it. In an illustrative letter obtained from a credible source, an informed borrower confronted their lender, demanding a cash receipt for the promissory note and the discharge of the remaining balance. This action was grounded in the assertion of their right to claim ownership of the note under equitable principles.

Mortgage Promissory NOTES are Assets How to Request Return of Your Promissory NOTE Asset 1

 

Mortgages are the biggest scams and this is a HUGE PUBLIC matter. How is the entire Mortgage Industry a Fraud with improper disclosure and double ledger banking, and double dipping ? You finance your own loans (not the banks), YOUR promissory NOTE has cash value, and if the mortgage isn’t paid, the insurance company pays it.

The mortgage industry is one of the biggest scams of EVERYONE’S lifetime.

 

 

 

Conclusion:
The borrower’s right to claim their promissory note is an overlooked aspect of the mortgage securitization process. While the system is legally sound, the ethical implications of non-disclosure stand in stark contrast to principles of fairness and transparency. It’s crucial for borrowers to be fully informed about their rights and for regulatory bodies to enforce clearer communication from financial institutions. As this understanding permeates the consciousness of mortgage borrowers, it may lead to a significant shift in how lenders operate and interact with their clients.

Many borrowers have the right to recoupment and/or rescission. Understanding how to reclaim their promissory notes and understanding the difference between being a credit and debtor is essential.

Leave your vote

More

Don’t Stop Here

More To Explore

Judge Roy K Altman’s Blatant Bias and Undermining of the the U.S. Constitution, the UCC, and HJR 192

Judge Roy K Altman’s Blatant Bias and Undermining of the the U.S. Constitution, the UCC, and HJR 192

In recent legal proceedings, Judge Altman’s handling of critical commercial and financial laws has raised serious concerns. His dismissal of key sections of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) and essential federal statutes, such as House Joint Resolution 192 and 18 U.S.C. § 8, undermines the integrity of the U.S. legal system. These laws are foundational to understanding the complex interplay of U.S. monetary policy, debt discharge, and commercial transactions. In this article, we will dissect the significant legal missteps in Judge Altman’s ruling, exploring the implications for commercial law, government debt obligations, and the broader judicial system.

Title 18 Crimes and Civil Remedies Avoiding Common Pitfalls That Cause Dismissals

Title 18 Crimes and Civil Remedies: Avoiding Common Pitfalls That Cause Dismissals

Bare criminal statutes define unlawful behaviors and prescribe penalties such as fines or imprisonment but do not grant individuals the right to file lawsuits. These statutes are enforced exclusively by government authorities. In contrast, a private right of action allows individuals to file lawsuits for civil remedies, either explicitly or implied by courts. While criminal statutes like mail fraud or conspiracy against rights may not provide private remedies, other laws such as RICO or § 1983 may allow victims to seek civil redress. The distinction between criminal enforcement and civil remedies underscores the importance of understanding statutory rights for successful legal claims.

Riverside County Sheriff Facing One Trillion Lawsuit Right to Travel Conspiracy Racketeering Lawsuit

The $1 Trillion Conspiracy Lawsuit: Rights to Travel, Clearfield Doctrine, and California Vehicle Code Exposed

Riverside County Sheriff deputies Gregory D. Eastwood and Robert C. V. Bowman stalked national and private attorney-in-fact Kevin L. Walker through his neighborhood around the corner from his home, then arrested him on a bogus warrant and towed his Lamborghini. There is now an administrative process taking place and a pending One Trillion Dollar ($1,000,000,000,000.00) Federal conspiracy, fraud, forced peonage, and racketeering lawsuit against the deputies and the Riverside County Sheriff Department.

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.

error: Content is protected !!

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.

error: Content is protected !!