intangibles

The Intricacies of Intangible Assets: Fractionalization and Securitization in Modern Finance

Intangible assets, though lacking physical form, are the bedrock of contemporary finance. They range from Federal Reserve Notes—our cash in hand, backed by the government’s promise—to promissory notes, which are commitments to repay a certain amount in the future. These assets, along with credit agreements, represent value based on Trust and contractual obligations.

Unlike cryptocurrencies, which are inherently fractionable, traditional intangibles like promissory notes and credit agreements are often fractionally divided and securitized beneath the surface of loans. This process transforms them into marketable securities, allowing for diversification of investment portfolios. The practice of securitizing debt amplifies the liquidity of these intangibles, enabling their trade on secondary markets. As such, they contribute to the complex web of financial instruments that underpin the global economy.

The fractionalization and securitization of these traditional intangible assets introduce layers of complexity to our financial systems, mirroring in some ways the divisible nature of cryptocurrency but within a more regulated framework. Understanding these processes is crucial, as they impact everything from interest rates to the stability of financial institutions.

Leave your vote

More

Don’t Stop Here

More To Explore

Screen Shot 2025 07 12 at 1.03.15 PM

How to Recuse a Federal Judge — And Why It’s Mandatory and They Must Step Down Immediately Under 28 U.S.C. § 144 and § 455

Learn how to lawfully recuse a biased federal judge using 28 U.S.C. §§ 144 and 455. Once a verified motion and affidavit are filed, disqualification is immediate, mandatory, and strips the judge of all jurisdiction. Any continued action by that judge is ultra vires and void ab initio. This article exposes the legal authority behind automatic recusal and outlines your remedies if the judge refuses to step down.Ask ChatGPT

Screen Shot 2025 07 09 at 1.55.31 PM

EXPOSING JUDICIAL FRAUD: How a Federal Judge Otis D. Wright, II Ignored Civil Rights Law, Violated Due Process, and Tried to Bury a Federal Removal Under 28 U.S.C. § 1443(1)

A federal judge’s July 2025 order is now under fire for unlawfully striking a removal, misapplying criminal statutes, ignoring unrebutted affidavits, and participating in a fraudulent party substitution. The case, originally removed under 28 U.S.C. § 1443(1), involves severe allegations of constitutional violations, jurisdictional fraud, and due process abuse. Despite clear legal precedent barring time limits on § 1443 removals, the court falsely claimed the removal was untimely and smeared the petitioner with defamatory labels. This article exposes the judicial misconduct, factual distortions, and illegality underlying the void order now being challenged.

Screen Shot 2025 07 08 at 9.35.01 PM

EMERGENCY PETITION FOR WRIT MANDAMUS VANISHES: Ninth Circuit Fraud, Tampering, Judicial Collusion, and a Federal Cover-Up Seems Unequivocal

Federal courts are now under scrutiny after a verified Writ of Mandamus vanished from the Ninth Circuit docket without explanation—raising grave concerns of judicial tampering, fraud, and systemic misconduct. Judge Sunshine Sykes defied clear jurisdictional divestiture by issuing rulings on a matter under appellate review, violating 28 U.S.C. § 144 and § 1651. This article exposes a disturbing pattern of ultra vires acts, denial of due process, and potential RICO violations implicating both district and appellate judges.Ask ChatGPT

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.

error: Content is protected !!