The Uniform Commercial Code What is it? What is it for?

The Uniform Commercial Code: Your Legal Guide to Loans, Mortgages, and Everyday Finances

The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) governs commercial transactions in the United States, providing a standardized set of laws for dealings involving the sale of goods, leasing of goods, negotiable instruments, secured transactions, and other commercial activities. It is one of the most important frameworks for regulating commercial law across different states.

 

Here’s a breakdown of the key areas the UCC governs:

1. Sales of Goods (Article 2): This governs the sale of goods (tangible personal property), including rules on contracts, obligations, and warranties. It provides guidelines for transactions like pricing, delivery, and risk of loss.

2. Leases (Article 2A): This article applies to the leasing of goods, defining how leasing contracts work, including parties’ rights and remedies in the event of a breach.

3. Negotiable Instruments (Article 3): This covers financial instruments such as checks, promissory notes, and drafts, dictating their creation, transfer, and enforcement.

4. Bank Deposits and Collections (Article 4): This deals with the relationship between banks and their customers, including rules on deposits, checks, and collection processes.

5. Funds Transfers (Article 4A): It regulates electronic funds transfers between parties and banks.

6. Letters of Credit (Article 5): Governs the use of letters of credit, commonly used in international trade to guarantee payment.

7. Bulk Sales (Article 6): Provides rules for the sale of business assets in bulk, aimed at preventing fraudulent transfers when a business is sold.

8. Warehouse Receipts, Bills of Lading, and Other Documents of Title (Article 7): This article addresses the handling of goods in storage and transportation, including warehouse receipts and bills of lading.

9. Investment Securities (Article 8): Governs the sale and transfer of securities, such as stocks and bonds, including the rights of the investors.

10. Secured Transactions (Article 9): This is a vital part of the UCC that governs transactions involving security interests in personal property (collateral), including the creation, perfection, and enforcement of security interests.

Each U.S. state has adopted the UCC with some variations, which creates a uniform legal framework that facilitates business operations across state lines. The code is essential for handling modern business transactions, especially those involving goods and “commercial” paper.

 

What is “commercial” ?

Everything is the pubic is “commercial” including just about all crimes, as explicitly stipulated in the Code of Federal Regulations.

27 Code of Federal Regulations § 72.11 – Meaning of terms.

Commercial crimes. Any of the following types of crimes (Federal or State): Offenses against the revenue laws; burglary; counterfeiting; forgery; kidnapping; larceny; robbery; illegal sale or possession of deadly weapons; prostitution (including soliciting, procuring, pandering, white slaving, keeping house of ill fame, and like offenses); extortion; swindling and confidence games; and attempting to commit, conspiring to commit, or compounding any of the foregoing crimes. Addiction to narcotic drugs and use of marihuana will be treated as if such were commercial crime.”

 

 

Leave your vote

93792 points
More

Don’t Stop Here

More To Explore

What a California Court Commissioner Really Is and how Charles Rogers Jeremiah Raxter are Engaged in RICO and Felonies in Riverside California 1 1

Riverside, California: What a California Court Commissioner Really Is and how Fraudulent “Commissioner” Charles Rogers, Jeremiah Raxter are Engaged in RICO and Felonies

Charles Rogers (Bar #64530) and Jeremiah D. Raxter (Bar #276811) are engaged in an ongoing scheme of judicial fraud and racketeering in Riverside County, California. Both individuals are inactive members of the California State Bar and have no lawful authority to act as judges or commissioners. Their acts — including issuing bench warrants, signing orders, and presiding over court matters — are void ab initio and constitute federal felonies under 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242, and 1962. Their actions represent a criminal enterprise under color of law, demanding immediate investigation, disbarment, and prosecution. Public notice is hereby given that all their proceedings are fraudulent and without legal force.

Criminal RICO Syndicate in Riverside County, California: How Lawyers Posing as “Judges,” Clerks, and Deputies Form an Ongoing Enterprise of Fraud, Obstruction, and Human Rights Violations — 42 USC 1984, 18 USC 241-242, RICO, Extortion and more

Organized Judicial Racketeering in Southern California: How Attorneys Masquerading as Judges Collude with Clerks and Sheriffs to Perpetrate Fraud, Extortion, and Civil Rights Violations Under Color of Law

This exposé reveals a coordinated RICO enterprise operating within Riverside County’s justice system, naming Sheriff Chad Bianco, DA Michael Hestrin, Commissioner Tamara L. Wagner, and others for systemic fraud, extortion, and deprivation of rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. It further exposes U.S. District Judge Jesus G. Bernal for judicial obstruction and record concealment, constituting willful interference in violation of federal due process. Backed by an active federal RICO lawsuit under 18 U.S.C. § 1962 before Judge Wesley Hsu, the article outlines a pattern of racketeering, forged instruments, false filings, and unlawful evictions. Officials including Pam Bondi, Rob Bonta, Kash Patel, and the FBI have been formally notified but remain silent. This is not isolated misconduct—it is organized crime under color of law. The piece stands as both public notice and evidentiary documentation for further federal action.

RICO-Fueled Courtroom Corruption in Riverside: Attorney Tamara L. Wagner Implicated for Fraud and Abuse of Office

RICO-Fueled Courtroom Corruption in Riverside: Attorney Tamara L. Wagner Implicated for Fraud and Abuse of Office

Tamara L. Wagner (CA Bar #188613), a licensed attorney acting as a judicial officer in Riverside County, is now at the center of a federal removal action citing judicial fraud, civil rights violations, and RICO conspiracy. Defendants allege she is unlawfully practicing law from the bench without constitutional authority, advancing proceedings in open dishonor. Verified affidavits, UCC filings, and summary judgment demands were ignored, leading to claims of railroading and systemic court corruption. The case, removed under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1441, 1443, and 1446, is now pending in federal court.

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.

error: Content is protected !!