Using IRS Forms 3949-A and 211 to Expose Organized Crime, Corrupt Judges, Clerks, Courts, and Financial Misconduct

Using IRS Forms 3949-A and 211 to Expose Organized Crime, Corrupt Judges, Clerks, Courts, and Financial Misconduct

Corruption within the judicial system, including fraudulent accounting, improper banking practices, and organized crime, poses a severe threat to justice and financial stability. Fortunately, whistleblowers have powerful tools at their disposal to report such misconduct to the Department of the Treasury – Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Two of the most effective mechanisms for exposing financial fraud involving corrupt courts, clerks, judges, and officials are IRS Form 3949-A (Information Referral) and IRS Form 211 (Application for Award for Original Information).

This article will explain how these forms can be used to report organized financial crime and improper accounting by judicial officials, ensuring accountability through federal tax and fraud enforcement.


Understanding ‘Department of the Treasury – Internal Revenue Service’ Form 3949-A: Reporting Financial Crimes and Corruption

IRS Form 3949-A is designed for individuals to report suspected tax law violations, including fraud, money laundering, and illicit financial activities. This form is particularly useful for exposing:

  • Fraudulent Accounting and Tax Evasion by Courts and Officials – Clerks, judges, and attorneys often engage in fraudulent tax reporting, failing to disclose illicit income or misrepresenting financial records to conceal misconduct.
  • Money Laundering and Unauthorized Banking Practices – Some courts and legal officials misuse funds, operate off-the-books accounts, or participate in schemes where funds are funneled through illegitimate trusts or undisclosed bank accounts.
  • Embezzlement and Misappropriation of Public Funds – Judicial officers divert funds meant for court operations, fines, and settlements into personal or private accounts, violating tax laws and fiduciary responsibilities.
  • Bribery and Racketeering – Corrupt officials often receive unlawful financial benefits from attorneys, corporations, or criminal enterprises, leading to compromised rulings and selective enforcement of the law.

How to File Form 3949-A

To report these violations, individuals can complete Form 3949-A, providing specific details of the wrongdoing, including:

  1. Names and Titles of Offenders – List the judges, clerks, attorneys, or officials involved.
  2. Specific Financial Violations – Describe the nature of the crime, such as false tax filings, bribery payments, or hidden assets.
  3. Supporting Documentation – Include any evidence, such as bank statements, fraudulent court orders, or financial irregularities.
  4. Anonymous Submission – The IRS allows submissions without revealing the identity of the whistleblower.

Once completed, the form should be mailed to:

Internal Revenue Service
PO Box 3801
Ogden, UT 84409

The IRS investigates these claims and, if violations are confirmed, legal and financial consequences follow, including asset seizures, fines, and potential criminal charges.

 


Using ‘Department of the Treasury – Internal Revenue Service’ Form 211: Whistleblower Rewards for Reporting Large-Scale Corruption

For cases involving significant financial fraud, where the IRS recovers $2 million or more, whistleblowers can use IRS Form 211 to report the misconduct and qualify for a financial reward. This form is particularly valuable when exposing:

  • Judicial Corruption on a Large Scale – If a judge or court is facilitating multimillion-dollar fraud schemes, this form ensures a financial incentive for those providing actionable intelligence.
  • Improper Handling of Court Funds – Clerks or administrative officials who manipulate financial records to launder money or evade taxation.
  • Law Firms Engaging in Tax Evasion and Money Laundering – Some attorneys collude with judicial officers to misreport income, shield funds in offshore accounts, or engage in fraudulent financial dealings.

How to File Form 211 and Claim a Reward

  1. Gather Evidence – Collect all available documentation proving the fraud, such as fraudulent tax returns, court financial statements, or unauthorized banking transactions.

  2. Complete Form 211 – Provide detailed information on the individuals and entities involved, the estimated amount of unpaid taxes, and the method of fraud.

  3. Submit to the IRS Whistleblower Office – Send the completed form to:

    IRS Whistleblower Office
    1973 N. Rulon White Blvd.
    M/S 4110
    Ogden, UT 84404

  4. IRS Investigation and Reward – If the IRS successfully prosecutes and recovers funds based on the provided information, whistleblowers can receive between 15% and 30% of the amount collected.

 


Why These Forms Matter in Exposing Judicial and Government Corruption

1. Unveiling Hidden Financial Networks

Many corrupt officials exploit their positions to engage in undisclosed banking transactions, fraudulent real estate deals, and money laundering through the courts. IRS investigations can track these illicit transactions and bring perpetrators to justice.

2. Holding Officials Accountable for Tax Crimes

Courts and government officials must comply with tax laws like any other entity. Reporting their financial misconduct ensures that those abusing public trust face tax evasion charges, penalties, and asset forfeitures.

3. Disrupting Organized Crime in the Judicial System

Judicial corruption often intersects with organized crime, racketeering, and banking fraud. The IRS has broad authority to investigate criminal financial enterprises, even when traditional law enforcement fails to act due to internal collusion.

4. Providing a Safe and Rewarding Path for Whistleblowers

Because IRS whistleblower programs allow for anonymous reporting, individuals can safely expose corruption without fear of retaliation. Those who submit Form 211 may also receive substantial financial compensation for their role in exposing tax-related fraud.


Conclusion: A Powerful Tool for Justice

Corrupt courts, clerks, judges, and officials often manipulate financial systems, engage in tax fraud, and collude with organized crime to escape accountability. IRS Forms 3949-A and 211 provide a powerful avenue for whistleblowers to expose these violations, ensuring that fraudulent financial activities are investigated and prosecuted.

By reporting misconduct through the IRS, individuals contribute to transparency, financial accountability, and the dismantling of corruption within the judicial system. Those with evidence of large-scale fraud not only assist in bringing criminals to justice but may also receive substantial monetary rewards.

For those aware of illegal financial activities within the judicial system, now is the time to act. Expose the fraud, protect the integrity of the courts, and ensure justice prevails.

Leave your vote

373821 points
More

Don’t Stop Here

More To Explore

PHH Mortgage Corporation's Motion to Dismiss in Kevin Walker Estate, et al. v. PHH Mortgage Corporation, et al. is a glaring example of procedural misconduct, constitutional violations, and a deliberate attempt to obstruct justice. The Plaintiffs have conditionally accepted PHH Mortgage’s non-compliant filing, thereby tendering a binding counteroffer that PHH must now rebut. PHH’s continued silence and failure to rebut the conditional acceptance further compounds their non-performance and dishonor. Additionally, the Defendants’ filing violates multiple-defendant court rules, misrepresents the law, displays incompetence and a war against the Constitution, and constitutes blatant obstruction of justice.

KEVIN WALKER ESTATE’S Conditional Acceptance Exposes PHH Mortgage’s Motion as Procedurally Defective, Deceitful and Dishonest, Unconstitutional, and Legally Void

PHH Mortgage Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss in Kevin Walker Estate, et al. v. PHH Mortgage Corporation, et al. is a glaring example of procedural misconduct, constitutional violations, and a deliberate attempt to obstruct justice. The Plaintiffs have conditionally accepted PHH Mortgage’s non-compliant filing, thereby tendering a binding counteroffer that PHH must now rebut. PHH’s continued silence and failure to rebut the conditional acceptance further compounds their non-performance and dishonor. Additionally, the Defendants’ filing, prepared by Neil J. Cooper of HOUSER LLP, violates multiple-defendant court rules, misrepresents the law, displays incompetence and a war against the Constitution, and constitutes blatant obstruction of justice.

Further exacerbating this obstruction, critical documents remain missing from the court docket and record, preventing a full and fair adjudication of the Plaintiffs’ claims. This deliberate suppression of filings by the court and Defendants undermines due process, conceals key evidence, and constitutes judicial misconduct. The failure to properly record and acknowledge Plaintiffs’ filings further demonstrates systematic efforts to manipulate the proceedings in PHH Mortgage’s favor, reinforcing the need for immediate judicial correction, sanctions, and enforcement of Plaintiffs’ default judgment demands.

Judicial Misconduct in Riverside, California: Defendant PHH Mortgage's ("loan servicer") Baseless Motion and the Court’s Obstruction of Justice

Judicial Misconduct in Riverside, California: Defendant PHH Mortgage’s (“loan servicer”) Baseless Motion and the Court’s Obstruction of Justice

PHH Mortgage’s Motion to Dismiss in Kevin Walker Estate, et al. v. PHH Mortgage Corporation, et al. exemplifies judicial overreach, procedural abuse, and a blatant disregard for constitutional rights. The motion falsely asserts that a trust cannot be represented by an attorney-in-fact, denying individuals their right to self-representation and claiming that only "attorneys at law" can act in court. This contradicts established legal principles, including the American Bar Association’s recognition of power of attorney as a legitimate instrument granting broad authority. Additionally, the court has obstructed the record by refusing to file Plaintiffs’ documents, prompting a writ of mandamus to expose the Riverside Federal Court’s misconduct. This case underscores a broader pattern of legal corruption, defamation, and deprivation of rights under the color of law.

Screen Shot 2025 02 19 at 1.22.22 PM

KEVIN WALKER Estate Demands Writ of Mandamus as Riverside Federal Court Engages in Corruption, Record Tampering, and Obstruction of Justice

The United States District Court, Central District of California (Riverside), stands accused of obstructing justice, tampering with records, and violating due process by unlawfully refusing to file and docket legitimate pleadings. Plaintiffs KEVIN WALKER ESTATE, et al., hav presented irrefutable evidence of judicial misconduct, calling for criminal prosecution, sanctions, and immediate enforcement. Despite proof of receipt, court officials have concealed filings, manipulated records, and obstructed legal proceedings, in direct violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1505, 1512, 1519, and 2071. With Pam Bondi CC’d on the correspondence, high-level authorities have been alerted to this grave constitutional violation that threatens judicial integrity and fundamental rights.

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.

error: Content is protected !!