W 4, W 2, W 9, and W 8BEN The IRS Forms That Define Your Tax Status and Who Really Benefits11

W-4, W-2, W-9, and W-8BEN: How IRS Forms Determine Your Tax Status and Legal Standing

Most workers in the U.S. sign a W-4 or W-9 without realizing they’re voluntarily entering into a federal tax contract that defines their labor as taxable “wages” or income. These forms establish U.S. person status and allow employers or payers to withhold taxes and issue reporting forms like the W-2 or 1099. Alternatively, the W-8BEN can be used to lawfully assert foreign status, potentially eliminating or reducing tax withholding and shifting your income outside federal jurisdiction. To use it properly, you must have a valid legal foundation—such as corrected status, a foreign trust or entity, and a private contractual arrangement not subject to statutory employment law. If used incorrectly, the IRS may treat the W-8BEN as fraudulent. Dealing in good faith and clearly expressing your intentions matters. Choosing the right form is more than paperwork — it determines your status, rights, and financial control.

Most people working in the United States are handed a W-4 on day one of employment. They fill it out automatically, not realizing they’ve just entered into a binding legal and tax relationship with the federal government.

But did you know you may have a lawful right to not use the W-4, and instead file a W-8BEN — the IRS form used to declare foreign status?

To understand your options and how to lawfully assert them, you must first understand how these forms work, what they truly mean, and who benefits when you sign them.


🔍 The Four Key IRS Forms That Control Your Labor

Let’s break it down:

Form Purpose Used By
W-4 Tells employer how much tax to withhold from your paycheck U.S. persons working as statutory employees
W-2 Year-end wage report showing earnings and tax withheld Issued to U.S. employees by employer
W-9 Certifies U.S. person status for payments made outside of payroll U.S. contractors, freelancers, and businesses
W-8BEN Certifies foreign status to exempt or reduce tax withholding Nonresident aliens and foreign persons/entities

💼 What Happens When You Sign a W-4?

When you sign a W-4, you are:

  • Declaring yourself a U.S. person under IRS definitions (see IRC § 7701(a))

  • Agreeing that your labor is subject to federal income tax as “wages”

  • Entering into a voluntary withholding agreement under 26 CFR § 31.3402(p)-1

In other words, you contract into federal tax liability — and give your employer the legal power to:

  • Withhold taxes from your pay

  • Report your labor to the IRS

  • Issue you a W-2


🏦 The W-9: A Similar Contract for Non-Employees

If you’re a contractor, freelancer, or business owner, the IRS may ask for a W-9. This form:

  • Declares your status as a U.S. person

  • Provides your TIN (usually your SSN or EIN)

  • Allows the payer to issue a 1099, which reports payments to you

Like the W-4, signing a W-9 also enters you into the federal income tax system. Once submitted, the IRS assumes you’re a taxable entity within the United States jurisdiction, even if you’re not an employee.


🌐 The W-8BEN: Certifying Foreign Status

The W-8BEN is used by individuals who are:

  • Nonresident aliens, OR

  • Operating in a foreign capacity (through trusts, foreign-classified entities, or corrected status)

It certifies that:

“I am not a U.S. person. I do not engage in a U.S. trade or business. I am not subject to U.S. income tax withholding except as specified by treaty.”

This form:

  • Lawfully exempts you from W-4 or W-9 obligations

  • Prevents the issuance of a W-2 or 1099

  • May result in a Form 1042-S instead, or no reporting at all


⚠️ Important Caveats

The IRS and courts presume you are a U.S. taxpayer by default. Unless you properly rebut that presumption, they will treat your labor as taxable income under federal jurisdiction.

If you use a W-8BEN incorrectly or without the proper legal foundation, the IRS may consider it fraudulent, which can lead to penalties or enforcement.

To lawfully use a W-8BEN instead of a W-4 or W-9, you must establish:


✅ 1. Proper Status Correction

You need to correct your legal status:

  • Declare yourself as a non-citizen national, foreign national, or nonresident alien

  • Remove yourself from presumptions of 14th Amendment federal citizenship

  • Record the proper affidavits, declarations, and notices with appropriate authorities


✅ 2. Foreign Trust or Entity Structure

You must act through a:

  • Private foreign trust

  • Foreign-classified LLC or foundation

  • Foreign disregarded entity, if operating in commerce

The entity — not the individual — uses the W-8BEN-E to declare its foreign status and exemption from reporting requirements like the W-9.


✅ 3. Private Contractual Relationship (Not Statutory Employment)

To avoid W-4/W-2 classification:

  • Your labor must be performed under private agreement, not as an “employee” under federal statutes

  • You cannot participate in federal benefit programs (Social Security, unemployment, etc.)

  • You must not operate under federal privileges

In short, you must remain outside the statutory employment system to avoid the legal obligations that come with it.


🔐 Who Benefits From These Forms?

Form Who Benefits How
W-4 IRS, Employer IRS gets pre-paid tax. Employer avoids liability, deducts wages.
W-2 IRS Evidence of taxable wages under federal jurisdiction
W-9 IRS, Payer IRS gets reporting. Payer avoids backup withholding liability
W-8BEN You (if lawfully filed) Exempts you from withholding; protects foreign status

Summary: Reclaiming Your Status

If you’re tired of:

  • Automatic tax withholding,

  • Presumptions of U.S. person status,

  • Having your labor treated as taxable income under federal definitions…

…then it’s time to look deeper into the lawful use of the W-8BEN, foreign trusts, and private contracts.

This isn’t tax evasion — it’s status correction, contract law, and jurisdictional clarity.

But remember: to succeed with this approach, you must do it correctly and with lawful standing. Anything less can result in rejection or worse — enforcement under fraud statutes.

Leave your vote

More

Don’t Stop Here

More To Explore

20410479 329d 40a2 8d4d 492022986bb5

Void Means Void: When Judges Act Without Jurisdiction, Their Orders Are Legal Nullities

When a court acts without lawful jurisdiction—whether through improper removal, lack of subject matter or personal authority, or constitutional violations—its orders are void ab initio and carry no legal force. This article explains how judges who continue to issue rulings after losing jurisdiction are not merely mistaken—they are acting under color of law and are subject to direct civil liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Backed by black-letter case law and statutory authority, this piece dismantles the myth of absolute judicial immunity and affirms a fundamental truth in law: jurisdiction is everything. When it’s gone, so is the court’s power to act.

Riverside County Commissioner Tamara Wagner Sued Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for Railroading Plaintiffs Under Color of Law Without Jurisdiction

Riverside County Commissioner Tamara Wagner Sued Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for Railroading Plaintiffs Under Color of Law Without Jurisdiction

In a federal civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Plaintiffs Kevin: Realworldfare and Corey: Walker expose Riverside Court Commissioner Tamara L. Wagner’s unlawful railroading under color of law and total absence of jurisdiction. Despite a pending Quiet Title Action and perfected federal removal, Wagner issued void orders to dispossess the Walker Estate—yet the Estate remains lawfully and firmly in possession. Now under Article III jurisdiction, Judge Kenly Kiya Kato presides over the live case, which alleges constitutional violations, commercial fraud, and abuse of process. This is a high-stakes confrontation between equity and overreach—where immunity fails and facts prevail.

Judges Can Be Sued: Public Servants, Oaths, and Liability Under the Clearfield Doctrine AND 42 U.S.C. 1983

Judges Can Be Sued: Public Servants, Oaths, and Liability Under the Clearfield Doctrine AND 42 U.S.C. 1983

Judges are not immune when they operate outside lawful jurisdiction, conspire under color of law, or engage in commercial enforcement without consent. Under the Clearfield Doctrine, they become corporate actors subject to liability like any private party. 42 U.S.C. § 1983 enables civil rights lawsuits against them individually, while 18 U.S.C. §§ 241–242 provides for criminal penalties for conspiracy and deprivation of rights. Through tort law, UCC, and case law like Rankin v. Howard, 633 F.2d 844 (9th Cir. 1980), and Pulliam v. Allen, 466 U.S. 522 (1984), judges can face personal and injunctive accountability.

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.

error: Content is protected !!