W 4, W 2, W 9, and W 8BEN The IRS Forms That Define Your Tax Status and Who Really Benefits11

W-4, W-2, W-9, and W-8BEN: How IRS Forms Determine Your Tax Status and Legal Standing

Most workers in the U.S. sign a W-4 or W-9 without realizing they’re voluntarily entering into a federal tax contract that defines their labor as taxable “wages” or income. These forms establish U.S. person status and allow employers or payers to withhold taxes and issue reporting forms like the W-2 or 1099. Alternatively, the W-8BEN can be used to lawfully assert foreign status, potentially eliminating or reducing tax withholding and shifting your income outside federal jurisdiction. To use it properly, you must have a valid legal foundation—such as corrected status, a foreign trust or entity, and a private contractual arrangement not subject to statutory employment law. If used incorrectly, the IRS may treat the W-8BEN as fraudulent. Dealing in good faith and clearly expressing your intentions matters. Choosing the right form is more than paperwork — it determines your status, rights, and financial control.

Most people working in the United States are handed a W-4 on day one of employment. They fill it out automatically, not realizing they’ve just entered into a binding legal and tax relationship with the federal government.

But did you know you may have a lawful right to not use the W-4, and instead file a W-8BEN — the IRS form used to declare foreign status?

To understand your options and how to lawfully assert them, you must first understand how these forms work, what they truly mean, and who benefits when you sign them.


🔍 The Four Key IRS Forms That Control Your Labor

Let’s break it down:

Form Purpose Used By
W-4 Tells employer how much tax to withhold from your paycheck U.S. persons working as statutory employees
W-2 Year-end wage report showing earnings and tax withheld Issued to U.S. employees by employer
W-9 Certifies U.S. person status for payments made outside of payroll U.S. contractors, freelancers, and businesses
W-8BEN Certifies foreign status to exempt or reduce tax withholding Nonresident aliens and foreign persons/entities

💼 What Happens When You Sign a W-4?

When you sign a W-4, you are:

  • Declaring yourself a U.S. person under IRS definitions (see IRC § 7701(a))

  • Agreeing that your labor is subject to federal income tax as “wages”

  • Entering into a voluntary withholding agreement under 26 CFR § 31.3402(p)-1

In other words, you contract into federal tax liability — and give your employer the legal power to:

  • Withhold taxes from your pay

  • Report your labor to the IRS

  • Issue you a W-2


🏦 The W-9: A Similar Contract for Non-Employees

If you’re a contractor, freelancer, or business owner, the IRS may ask for a W-9. This form:

  • Declares your status as a U.S. person

  • Provides your TIN (usually your SSN or EIN)

  • Allows the payer to issue a 1099, which reports payments to you

Like the W-4, signing a W-9 also enters you into the federal income tax system. Once submitted, the IRS assumes you’re a taxable entity within the United States jurisdiction, even if you’re not an employee.


🌐 The W-8BEN: Certifying Foreign Status

The W-8BEN is used by individuals who are:

  • Nonresident aliens, OR

  • Operating in a foreign capacity (through trusts, foreign-classified entities, or corrected status)

It certifies that:

“I am not a U.S. person. I do not engage in a U.S. trade or business. I am not subject to U.S. income tax withholding except as specified by treaty.”

This form:

  • Lawfully exempts you from W-4 or W-9 obligations

  • Prevents the issuance of a W-2 or 1099

  • May result in a Form 1042-S instead, or no reporting at all


⚠️ Important Caveats

The IRS and courts presume you are a U.S. taxpayer by default. Unless you properly rebut that presumption, they will treat your labor as taxable income under federal jurisdiction.

If you use a W-8BEN incorrectly or without the proper legal foundation, the IRS may consider it fraudulent, which can lead to penalties or enforcement.

To lawfully use a W-8BEN instead of a W-4 or W-9, you must establish:


✅ 1. Proper Status Correction

You need to correct your legal status:

  • Declare yourself as a non-citizen national, foreign national, or nonresident alien

  • Remove yourself from presumptions of 14th Amendment federal citizenship

  • Record the proper affidavits, declarations, and notices with appropriate authorities


✅ 2. Foreign Trust or Entity Structure

You must act through a:

  • Private foreign trust

  • Foreign-classified LLC or foundation

  • Foreign disregarded entity, if operating in commerce

The entity — not the individual — uses the W-8BEN-E to declare its foreign status and exemption from reporting requirements like the W-9.


✅ 3. Private Contractual Relationship (Not Statutory Employment)

To avoid W-4/W-2 classification:

  • Your labor must be performed under private agreement, not as an “employee” under federal statutes

  • You cannot participate in federal benefit programs (Social Security, unemployment, etc.)

  • You must not operate under federal privileges

In short, you must remain outside the statutory employment system to avoid the legal obligations that come with it.


🔐 Who Benefits From These Forms?

Form Who Benefits How
W-4 IRS, Employer IRS gets pre-paid tax. Employer avoids liability, deducts wages.
W-2 IRS Evidence of taxable wages under federal jurisdiction
W-9 IRS, Payer IRS gets reporting. Payer avoids backup withholding liability
W-8BEN You (if lawfully filed) Exempts you from withholding; protects foreign status

Summary: Reclaiming Your Status

If you’re tired of:

  • Automatic tax withholding,

  • Presumptions of U.S. person status,

  • Having your labor treated as taxable income under federal definitions…

…then it’s time to look deeper into the lawful use of the W-8BEN, foreign trusts, and private contracts.

This isn’t tax evasion — it’s status correction, contract law, and jurisdictional clarity.

But remember: to succeed with this approach, you must do it correctly and with lawful standing. Anything less can result in rejection or worse — enforcement under fraud statutes.

Leave your vote

More

Don’t Stop Here

More To Explore

What a California Court Commissioner Really Is and how Charles Rogers Jeremiah Raxter are Engaged in RICO and Felonies in Riverside California 1 1

Riverside, California: What a California Court Commissioner Really Is and how Fraudulent “Commissioner” Charles Rogers, Jeremiah Raxter are Engaged in RICO and Felonies

Charles Rogers (Bar #64530) and Jeremiah D. Raxter (Bar #276811) are engaged in an ongoing scheme of judicial fraud and racketeering in Riverside County, California. Both individuals are inactive members of the California State Bar and have no lawful authority to act as judges or commissioners. Their acts — including issuing bench warrants, signing orders, and presiding over court matters — are void ab initio and constitute federal felonies under 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242, and 1962. Their actions represent a criminal enterprise under color of law, demanding immediate investigation, disbarment, and prosecution. Public notice is hereby given that all their proceedings are fraudulent and without legal force.

Criminal RICO Syndicate in Riverside County, California: How Lawyers Posing as “Judges,” Clerks, and Deputies Form an Ongoing Enterprise of Fraud, Obstruction, and Human Rights Violations — 42 USC 1984, 18 USC 241-242, RICO, Extortion and more

Organized Judicial Racketeering in Southern California: How Attorneys Masquerading as Judges Collude with Clerks and Sheriffs to Perpetrate Fraud, Extortion, and Civil Rights Violations Under Color of Law

This exposé reveals a coordinated RICO enterprise operating within Riverside County’s justice system, naming Sheriff Chad Bianco, DA Michael Hestrin, Commissioner Tamara L. Wagner, and others for systemic fraud, extortion, and deprivation of rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. It further exposes U.S. District Judge Jesus G. Bernal for judicial obstruction and record concealment, constituting willful interference in violation of federal due process. Backed by an active federal RICO lawsuit under 18 U.S.C. § 1962 before Judge Wesley Hsu, the article outlines a pattern of racketeering, forged instruments, false filings, and unlawful evictions. Officials including Pam Bondi, Rob Bonta, Kash Patel, and the FBI have been formally notified but remain silent. This is not isolated misconduct—it is organized crime under color of law. The piece stands as both public notice and evidentiary documentation for further federal action.

RICO-Fueled Courtroom Corruption in Riverside: Attorney Tamara L. Wagner Implicated for Fraud and Abuse of Office

RICO-Fueled Courtroom Corruption in Riverside: Attorney Tamara L. Wagner Implicated for Fraud and Abuse of Office

Tamara L. Wagner (CA Bar #188613), a licensed attorney acting as a judicial officer in Riverside County, is now at the center of a federal removal action citing judicial fraud, civil rights violations, and RICO conspiracy. Defendants allege she is unlawfully practicing law from the bench without constitutional authority, advancing proceedings in open dishonor. Verified affidavits, UCC filings, and summary judgment demands were ignored, leading to claims of railroading and systemic court corruption. The case, removed under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1441, 1443, and 1446, is now pending in federal court.

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.

error: Content is protected !!