W 4, W 2, W 9, and W 8BEN The IRS Forms That Define Your Tax Status and Who Really Benefits11

W-4, W-2, W-9, and W-8BEN: How IRS Forms Determine Your Tax Status and Legal Standing

Most workers in the U.S. sign a W-4 or W-9 without realizing they’re voluntarily entering into a federal tax contract that defines their labor as taxable “wages” or income. These forms establish U.S. person status and allow employers or payers to withhold taxes and issue reporting forms like the W-2 or 1099. Alternatively, the W-8BEN can be used to lawfully assert foreign status, potentially eliminating or reducing tax withholding and shifting your income outside federal jurisdiction. To use it properly, you must have a valid legal foundation—such as corrected status, a foreign trust or entity, and a private contractual arrangement not subject to statutory employment law. If used incorrectly, the IRS may treat the W-8BEN as fraudulent. Dealing in good faith and clearly expressing your intentions matters. Choosing the right form is more than paperwork — it determines your status, rights, and financial control.

Most people working in the United States are handed a W-4 on day one of employment. They fill it out automatically, not realizing they’ve just entered into a binding legal and tax relationship with the federal government.

But did you know you may have a lawful right to not use the W-4, and instead file a W-8BEN — the IRS form used to declare foreign status?

To understand your options and how to lawfully assert them, you must first understand how these forms work, what they truly mean, and who benefits when you sign them.


🔍 The Four Key IRS Forms That Control Your Labor

Let’s break it down:

Form Purpose Used By
W-4 Tells employer how much tax to withhold from your paycheck U.S. persons working as statutory employees
W-2 Year-end wage report showing earnings and tax withheld Issued to U.S. employees by employer
W-9 Certifies U.S. person status for payments made outside of payroll U.S. contractors, freelancers, and businesses
W-8BEN Certifies foreign status to exempt or reduce tax withholding Nonresident aliens and foreign persons/entities

💼 What Happens When You Sign a W-4?

When you sign a W-4, you are:

  • Declaring yourself a U.S. person under IRS definitions (see IRC § 7701(a))

  • Agreeing that your labor is subject to federal income tax as “wages”

  • Entering into a voluntary withholding agreement under 26 CFR § 31.3402(p)-1

In other words, you contract into federal tax liability — and give your employer the legal power to:

  • Withhold taxes from your pay

  • Report your labor to the IRS

  • Issue you a W-2


🏦 The W-9: A Similar Contract for Non-Employees

If you’re a contractor, freelancer, or business owner, the IRS may ask for a W-9. This form:

  • Declares your status as a U.S. person

  • Provides your TIN (usually your SSN or EIN)

  • Allows the payer to issue a 1099, which reports payments to you

Like the W-4, signing a W-9 also enters you into the federal income tax system. Once submitted, the IRS assumes you’re a taxable entity within the United States jurisdiction, even if you’re not an employee.


🌐 The W-8BEN: Certifying Foreign Status

The W-8BEN is used by individuals who are:

  • Nonresident aliens, OR

  • Operating in a foreign capacity (through trusts, foreign-classified entities, or corrected status)

It certifies that:

“I am not a U.S. person. I do not engage in a U.S. trade or business. I am not subject to U.S. income tax withholding except as specified by treaty.”

This form:

  • Lawfully exempts you from W-4 or W-9 obligations

  • Prevents the issuance of a W-2 or 1099

  • May result in a Form 1042-S instead, or no reporting at all


⚠️ Important Caveats

The IRS and courts presume you are a U.S. taxpayer by default. Unless you properly rebut that presumption, they will treat your labor as taxable income under federal jurisdiction.

If you use a W-8BEN incorrectly or without the proper legal foundation, the IRS may consider it fraudulent, which can lead to penalties or enforcement.

To lawfully use a W-8BEN instead of a W-4 or W-9, you must establish:


✅ 1. Proper Status Correction

You need to correct your legal status:

  • Declare yourself as a non-citizen national, foreign national, or nonresident alien

  • Remove yourself from presumptions of 14th Amendment federal citizenship

  • Record the proper affidavits, declarations, and notices with appropriate authorities


✅ 2. Foreign Trust or Entity Structure

You must act through a:

  • Private foreign trust

  • Foreign-classified LLC or foundation

  • Foreign disregarded entity, if operating in commerce

The entity — not the individual — uses the W-8BEN-E to declare its foreign status and exemption from reporting requirements like the W-9.


✅ 3. Private Contractual Relationship (Not Statutory Employment)

To avoid W-4/W-2 classification:

  • Your labor must be performed under private agreement, not as an “employee” under federal statutes

  • You cannot participate in federal benefit programs (Social Security, unemployment, etc.)

  • You must not operate under federal privileges

In short, you must remain outside the statutory employment system to avoid the legal obligations that come with it.


🔐 Who Benefits From These Forms?

Form Who Benefits How
W-4 IRS, Employer IRS gets pre-paid tax. Employer avoids liability, deducts wages.
W-2 IRS Evidence of taxable wages under federal jurisdiction
W-9 IRS, Payer IRS gets reporting. Payer avoids backup withholding liability
W-8BEN You (if lawfully filed) Exempts you from withholding; protects foreign status

Summary: Reclaiming Your Status

If you’re tired of:

  • Automatic tax withholding,

  • Presumptions of U.S. person status,

  • Having your labor treated as taxable income under federal definitions…

…then it’s time to look deeper into the lawful use of the W-8BEN, foreign trusts, and private contracts.

This isn’t tax evasion — it’s status correction, contract law, and jurisdictional clarity.

But remember: to succeed with this approach, you must do it correctly and with lawful standing. Anything less can result in rejection or worse — enforcement under fraud statutes.

Leave your vote

More

Don’t Stop Here

More To Explore

Screen Shot 2025 07 12 at 1.03.15 PM

How to Recuse a Federal Judge — And Why It’s Mandatory and They Must Step Down Immediately Under 28 U.S.C. § 144 and § 455

Learn how to lawfully recuse a biased federal judge using 28 U.S.C. §§ 144 and 455. Once a verified motion and affidavit are filed, disqualification is immediate, mandatory, and strips the judge of all jurisdiction. Any continued action by that judge is ultra vires and void ab initio. This article exposes the legal authority behind automatic recusal and outlines your remedies if the judge refuses to step down.Ask ChatGPT

Screen Shot 2025 07 09 at 1.55.31 PM

EXPOSING JUDICIAL FRAUD: How a Federal Judge Otis D. Wright, II Ignored Civil Rights Law, Violated Due Process, and Tried to Bury a Federal Removal Under 28 U.S.C. § 1443(1)

A federal judge’s July 2025 order is now under fire for unlawfully striking a removal, misapplying criminal statutes, ignoring unrebutted affidavits, and participating in a fraudulent party substitution. The case, originally removed under 28 U.S.C. § 1443(1), involves severe allegations of constitutional violations, jurisdictional fraud, and due process abuse. Despite clear legal precedent barring time limits on § 1443 removals, the court falsely claimed the removal was untimely and smeared the petitioner with defamatory labels. This article exposes the judicial misconduct, factual distortions, and illegality underlying the void order now being challenged.

Screen Shot 2025 07 08 at 9.35.01 PM

EMERGENCY PETITION FOR WRIT MANDAMUS VANISHES: Ninth Circuit Fraud, Tampering, Judicial Collusion, and a Federal Cover-Up Seems Unequivocal

Federal courts are now under scrutiny after a verified Writ of Mandamus vanished from the Ninth Circuit docket without explanation—raising grave concerns of judicial tampering, fraud, and systemic misconduct. Judge Sunshine Sykes defied clear jurisdictional divestiture by issuing rulings on a matter under appellate review, violating 28 U.S.C. § 144 and § 1651. This article exposes a disturbing pattern of ultra vires acts, denial of due process, and potential RICO violations implicating both district and appellate judges.Ask ChatGPT

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.

error: Content is protected !!