When a Home Auction Sale is Void Ab Initio: The Truth About Unauthorized Trustee Sales in Non-Judicial Foreclosures

When a Home Auction Sale is Void Ab Initio: The Truth About Unauthorized Trustee Sales in Non-Judicial Foreclosures

In today’s mortgage and foreclosure landscape, countless homeowners have unknowingly become victims of fraudulent trustee sales carried out through non-judicial foreclosure processes. These transactions, often masked with official-looking documents and legal jargon, may appear legitimate—but under contract and property law, they may be void ab initio, or invalid from the very beginning.

This article explains what happens when a homeowner lawfully conveys their home to a private trust, how loan servicers and unauthorized trustees railroad people into illegal sales, and how fraud nullifies the entire process—no matter how much time has passed.


🔒 Placing Your Home in a Private Trust

When you transfer your property into a private trust using a grant deed, you:

  • Remove the asset from your personal name,

  • Place it under the protection of private contract law,

  • And assign both legal and equitable title to the trust.

That grant deed becomes the official and lawful title to the property, and the trust becomes the sole legal authority over its disposition.


⚠️ Non-Judicial Foreclosure: A Tool for Deception

Non-judicial foreclosure is designed as a streamlined, out-of-court process that allows a trustee to sell a home after a borrower allegedly defaults on a loan.

But it has become a tool for abuse and deception, especially by loan servicers and mortgage debt collectors, who:

  • Ignore due process,

  • File fraudulent assignments of trustee,

  • And initiate foreclosure sales without legal authority.

These actions often occur in the midst of administrative processes—such as Qualified Written Requests (QWRs), Debt Validation Notices (FDCPA), or private arbitration procedures—where the homeowner is actively asserting their rights or disputing the debt.

Instead of responding in good faith, servicers railroad homeowners through foreclosure, bypassing the administrative process and attempting to finalize the theft through a Trustee’s Deed of Sale.


🧾 They’re Not Selling the Home—They’re Selling the Lien

Here’s the core truth:
The Trustee’s Deed of Sale in a non-judicial foreclosure does not transfer ownership of the home. It transfers only the security interest—the lien—that is attached to the home.

If the trustee assignment is fraudulent, and the lienholder has no valid standing, then the trustee is selling a lien they don’t legally control.

Thus, the buyer receives no lawful title—and the sale is null and void.


❌ Why the Sale Is Void Ab Initio

Void ab initio means the action was never valid from the beginning.

The trustee’s deed of sale is void ab initio if:

  • The trustee was never properly or lawfully assigned,

  • There was no verified default,

  • The administrative procedure was ongoing,

  • Or if the sale occurred in bad faith or in retaliation.

Upon proper articulation and objection by the injured party, the entire sale collapses legally—no matter how “final” it may appear on paper.

This is supported by the maxim:

Fraud vitiates everything it touches.”

And most importantly:

Fraud has no statute of limitations.
A fraudulent deed, once exposed, can be challenged and voided at any time, regardless of how much time has passed since the sale.


🛡️ The Trust Still Holds Title

Since the trust never authorized the sale, and the chain of title was broken through fraud, the original grant deed to the private trust remains intact.

In legal terms:

  • The fraudulent trustee’s deed conveys nothing.

  • The grant deed to the trust is the rightful title of record.

  • The homeowner, through the trust, retains full legal and equitable interest in the property.


🔚 Final Thought: Know the Game, and Stand Your Ground

Loan servicers rely on speed, silence, and confusion to ram through non-judicial foreclosures, often amidst valid administrative procedures. But when exposed and properly objected to, their actions amount to unlawful conversion, fraud, and abuse of process—not legitimate foreclosure.

A Trustee’s Deed of Sale, issued by a fraudulent or unauthorized trustee, is not worth the paper it’s printed on. It is void ab initio, and no lawful title transfers. The property remains under the authority of the trust, and the homeowner retains the power to challenge and undo the fraud.

Because in law—truth stands, fraud falls, and time does not shield the guilty.

Leave your vote

1273793 points
More

Don’t Stop Here

More To Explore

Judges Can Be Sued: Public Servants, Oaths, and Liability Under the Clearfield Doctrine AND 42 U.S.C. 1983

Judges Can Be Sued: Public Servants, Oaths, and Liability Under the Clearfield Doctrine AND 42 U.S.C. 1983

Judges are not immune when they operate outside lawful jurisdiction, conspire under color of law, or engage in commercial enforcement without consent. Under the Clearfield Doctrine, they become corporate actors subject to liability like any private party. 42 U.S.C. § 1983 enables civil rights lawsuits against them individually, while 18 U.S.C. §§ 241–242 provides for criminal penalties for conspiracy and deprivation of rights. Through tort law, UCC, and case law like Rankin v. Howard, 633 F.2d 844 (9th Cir. 1980), and Pulliam v. Allen, 466 U.S. 522 (1984), judges can face personal and injunctive accountability.

FEDERAL EXPOSURE AND COMMERCIAL COLLAPSE: The Reckless Legal Simulation and RICO Fraud of Naji Doumit, Marinaj Properties LLC, and Their Counsel John Bailey of BAILEY LEGAL GROUP in Riverside County, California

FEDERAL EXPOSURE AND COMMERCIAL COLLAPSE: The Reckless Legal Simulation and RICO Fraud of Naji Doumit, Marinaj Properties LLC, and Their Counsel John Bailey of BAILEY LEGAL GROUP in Riverside County, California

A devastating legal and commercial collapse is underway for Naji Doumit, Marinaj Properties LLC, and their counsel following a Verified Response that dismantles their fraudulent Cross-Complaint. With unrebutted affidavits, perfected UCC filings, and binding conditional acceptance, the Plaintiffs have closed the commercial record and exposed the Defendants to over $100 million in liability. Unauthorized use of protected trademarks like KEVIN WALKER™ and DONNABELLE MORTEL™ now carries $1 million per-use penalties. The Cross-Complaint stands in dishonor, their legal position is void, and federal enforcement is imminent. There is no path to relief—only escalating consequences.

RIVERSIDE COUNTY RICO CHARGES and BOND CLAIM AND COLLAPSE: VERIFIED CLAIMS, CRIMINAL FRAUD, AND $1 TRILLION LIEN ENFORCEMENT IN MOTION FOR ALL BONDS

RIVERSIDE COUNTY RICO CHARGES and BOND CLAIM AND COLLAPSE: VERIFIED CLAIMS, CRIMINAL FRAUD, AND $1 TRILLION LIEN ENFORCEMENT IN MOTION FOR ALL BONDS

Riverside County officials, deputies, and unlicensed “commissioners” are now in verified default, dishonor, and commercial liability for unrebutted RICO, fraud, and color-of-law crimes. Kevin: Realworldfare has removed case MISW2501134 to federal court, triggering lien enforcement and formal demand for disclosure of liability bonds. Evidence includes unrebutted affidavits, a $1 trillion commercial lien, and documented bond fraud by inactive attorneys Jeremiah Raxter and Charles Rogers. Federal claims include kidnapping, extortion, impersonation, and deprivation of rights under 18 U.S.C. §§ 241–242, 1961–1964. Brady-listed deputies remain under active investigation. If justice is not delivered, top national officials will be named in new federal actions for willful neglect and complicity.

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.

error: Content is protected !!