When a Home Auction Sale is Void Ab Initio: The Truth About Unauthorized Trustee Sales in Non-Judicial Foreclosures

When a Home Auction Sale is Void Ab Initio: The Truth About Unauthorized Trustee Sales in Non-Judicial Foreclosures

In today’s mortgage and foreclosure landscape, countless homeowners have unknowingly become victims of fraudulent trustee sales carried out through non-judicial foreclosure processes. These transactions, often masked with official-looking documents and legal jargon, may appear legitimate—but under contract and property law, they may be void ab initio, or invalid from the very beginning.

This article explains what happens when a homeowner lawfully conveys their home to a private trust, how loan servicers and unauthorized trustees railroad people into illegal sales, and how fraud nullifies the entire process—no matter how much time has passed.


🔒 Placing Your Home in a Private Trust

When you transfer your property into a private trust using a grant deed, you:

  • Remove the asset from your personal name,

  • Place it under the protection of private contract law,

  • And assign both legal and equitable title to the trust.

That grant deed becomes the official and lawful title to the property, and the trust becomes the sole legal authority over its disposition.


⚠️ Non-Judicial Foreclosure: A Tool for Deception

Non-judicial foreclosure is designed as a streamlined, out-of-court process that allows a trustee to sell a home after a borrower allegedly defaults on a loan.

But it has become a tool for abuse and deception, especially by loan servicers and mortgage debt collectors, who:

  • Ignore due process,

  • File fraudulent assignments of trustee,

  • And initiate foreclosure sales without legal authority.

These actions often occur in the midst of administrative processes—such as Qualified Written Requests (QWRs), Debt Validation Notices (FDCPA), or private arbitration procedures—where the homeowner is actively asserting their rights or disputing the debt.

Instead of responding in good faith, servicers railroad homeowners through foreclosure, bypassing the administrative process and attempting to finalize the theft through a Trustee’s Deed of Sale.


🧾 They’re Not Selling the Home—They’re Selling the Lien

Here’s the core truth:
The Trustee’s Deed of Sale in a non-judicial foreclosure does not transfer ownership of the home. It transfers only the security interest—the lien—that is attached to the home.

If the trustee assignment is fraudulent, and the lienholder has no valid standing, then the trustee is selling a lien they don’t legally control.

Thus, the buyer receives no lawful title—and the sale is null and void.


❌ Why the Sale Is Void Ab Initio

Void ab initio means the action was never valid from the beginning.

The trustee’s deed of sale is void ab initio if:

  • The trustee was never properly or lawfully assigned,

  • There was no verified default,

  • The administrative procedure was ongoing,

  • Or if the sale occurred in bad faith or in retaliation.

Upon proper articulation and objection by the injured party, the entire sale collapses legally—no matter how “final” it may appear on paper.

This is supported by the maxim:

Fraud vitiates everything it touches.”

And most importantly:

Fraud has no statute of limitations.
A fraudulent deed, once exposed, can be challenged and voided at any time, regardless of how much time has passed since the sale.


🛡️ The Trust Still Holds Title

Since the trust never authorized the sale, and the chain of title was broken through fraud, the original grant deed to the private trust remains intact.

In legal terms:

  • The fraudulent trustee’s deed conveys nothing.

  • The grant deed to the trust is the rightful title of record.

  • The homeowner, through the trust, retains full legal and equitable interest in the property.


🔚 Final Thought: Know the Game, and Stand Your Ground

Loan servicers rely on speed, silence, and confusion to ram through non-judicial foreclosures, often amidst valid administrative procedures. But when exposed and properly objected to, their actions amount to unlawful conversion, fraud, and abuse of process—not legitimate foreclosure.

A Trustee’s Deed of Sale, issued by a fraudulent or unauthorized trustee, is not worth the paper it’s printed on. It is void ab initio, and no lawful title transfers. The property remains under the authority of the trust, and the homeowner retains the power to challenge and undo the fraud.

Because in law—truth stands, fraud falls, and time does not shield the guilty.

Leave your vote

1273793 points
More

Don’t Stop Here

More To Explore

Screen Shot 2025 07 08 at 9.35.01 PM

EMERGENCY PETITION FOR WRIT MANDAMUS VANISHES: Ninth Circuit Fraud, Tampering, Judicial Collusion, and a Federal Cover-Up Seems Unequivocal

Federal courts are now under scrutiny after a verified Writ of Mandamus vanished from the Ninth Circuit docket without explanation—raising grave concerns of judicial tampering, fraud, and systemic misconduct. Judge Sunshine Sykes defied clear jurisdictional divestiture by issuing rulings on a matter under appellate review, violating 28 U.S.C. § 144 and § 1651. This article exposes a disturbing pattern of ultra vires acts, denial of due process, and potential RICO violations implicating both district and appellate judges.Ask ChatGPT

lawful tender discharges the debt

When the Debt Is Discharged but the LIEN Remains: Why Auto and Home Loan Lenders Who Ignore Lawful Tender Are Committing Fraud and Commercial Crimes

This article delivers a devastating legal breakdown proving that lawful tender—once made and unrebutted—discharges auto loan debt under UCC §§ 3-601, 3-603, 3-310, 2-206, and 1-103, as codified in Cal. Com. Code §§ 3601, 3603, 3310, 2206, 1103, Fla. Stat. §§ 673.6011, 673.6031, 673.3101, 672.206, 671.103, and N.C.G.S. §§ 25-3-601, 25-3-603, 25-3-310, 25-2-206, 25-1-103. It exposes refusal to release a lien after lawful discharge as actionable fraud, conversion, embezzlement, and obstruction under state and federal law. With verified case law and commercial principles, it explains how silence equals acceptance and how creditors become commercially estopped. A must-read for secured parties, fiduciaries, and equity claimants demanding lien removal, declaratory relief, and commercial remedy.

Screen Shot 2025 06 28 at 4.55.33 PM

How a Perfected Security Agreement and UCC Filings Strip Servicers of Foreclosure Rights

A properly executed Security Agreement assigning all assets, rights, and interests to a private trust—paired with a UCC-1 financing statement and UCC-3 amendment claiming the Deed of Trust and Note—lawfully establishes the trust as the secured party and real party in interest. This perfected interest, under UCC §§ 9-203, 9-509, 3-301, and supported by controlling case law (e.g., Carpenter v. Longan, Ibanez, Veal), strips any servicer or third-party of standing to foreclose unless they possess the original Note, prove an unbroken chain of title, and rebut the trust’s perfected claim. Without that, all foreclosure attempts become void ab initio, commercial dishonor, and legal trespass on private trust property.

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.

error: Content is protected !!