who should file a 1099a for checks dollars credit use and paymanets and utility bills

Who Should File Form 1099-A Based on Facts, Definitions, and IRS Instructions?

Form 1099-A, titled “Acquisition or Abandonment of Secured Property,” is utilized for the “Abandonment” or “Acquisition” of secured property. The IRS directives from 2022 state:

“Use Form 1099-A, Acquisition or Abandonment of Secured Property, when you lend money in connection with your trade or business and you either acquire an interest in property that is security for the debt, or you know that the property has been abandoned. This reporting requirement applies even if you are not in the business of lending money.”

The IRS further clarifies that “Property” encompasses: “real property (like a personal residence), any intangible property, and tangible personal property, with certain exceptions.”

1099a instructions from IRS included ANY INTANGIBLE secured property

This leads us to evaluate three key concepts: “Intangible Property,” “Interest,” and “Security.”

Intangible Property” is defined as property that doesn’t have intrinsic and marketable value on its own but represents or evidences value, such as stock certificates, bonds, promissory notes, checks, dollars/federal reserve notes, credit, debt instruments, UCC1 Filings, and franchises.

Interest,” particularly in relation to Property, is a broad term covering rights and claims to lands or chattels.

Security” and “Securities” refer to evidences of debts or property rights and obligations to pay money or participate in earnings and distribution of corporate, trust, and other property assets.

Therefore, when the IRS refers to “obligations” in Form 1099-A, it includes, but is not limited to, promissory notes, deeds, liens, checks, federal reserve notes, deposits, credit payments and use (like car payments, credit card payments, utility bills, etc.).

So, revisiting the IRS instructions with this understanding:

“File Form 1099-A for each borrower if you, in your trade or business, lend money and, as full or partial satisfaction of the debt, acquire an interest in property that serves as security for the debt, or have reason to believe the property has been abandoned. This reporting requirement applies even if you are not primarily in the business of lending money.”

In summary, the filing of a 1099-A is mandatory not just for those in the lending business. It’s required if you have acquired or abandoned any secured property, such as promissory notes, deeds, liens, checks, federal reserve notes, deposits, credit payments and use (like car payments, credit card payments, utility bills, etc.).

Leave your vote

45933 points
More

Don’t Stop Here

More To Explore

20410479 329d 40a2 8d4d 492022986bb5

Void Means Void: When Judges Act Without Jurisdiction, Their Orders Are Legal Nullities

When a court acts without lawful jurisdiction—whether through improper removal, lack of subject matter or personal authority, or constitutional violations—its orders are void ab initio and carry no legal force. This article explains how judges who continue to issue rulings after losing jurisdiction are not merely mistaken—they are acting under color of law and are subject to direct civil liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Backed by black-letter case law and statutory authority, this piece dismantles the myth of absolute judicial immunity and affirms a fundamental truth in law: jurisdiction is everything. When it’s gone, so is the court’s power to act.

Riverside County Commissioner Tamara Wagner Sued Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for Railroading Plaintiffs Under Color of Law Without Jurisdiction

Riverside County Commissioner Tamara Wagner Sued Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for Railroading Plaintiffs Under Color of Law Without Jurisdiction

In a federal civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Plaintiffs Kevin: Realworldfare and Corey: Walker expose Riverside Court Commissioner Tamara L. Wagner’s unlawful railroading under color of law and total absence of jurisdiction. Despite a pending Quiet Title Action and perfected federal removal, Wagner issued void orders to dispossess the Walker Estate—yet the Estate remains lawfully and firmly in possession. Now under Article III jurisdiction, Judge Kenly Kiya Kato presides over the live case, which alleges constitutional violations, commercial fraud, and abuse of process. This is a high-stakes confrontation between equity and overreach—where immunity fails and facts prevail.

Judges Can Be Sued: Public Servants, Oaths, and Liability Under the Clearfield Doctrine AND 42 U.S.C. 1983

Judges Can Be Sued: Public Servants, Oaths, and Liability Under the Clearfield Doctrine AND 42 U.S.C. 1983

Judges are not immune when they operate outside lawful jurisdiction, conspire under color of law, or engage in commercial enforcement without consent. Under the Clearfield Doctrine, they become corporate actors subject to liability like any private party. 42 U.S.C. § 1983 enables civil rights lawsuits against them individually, while 18 U.S.C. §§ 241–242 provides for criminal penalties for conspiracy and deprivation of rights. Through tort law, UCC, and case law like Rankin v. Howard, 633 F.2d 844 (9th Cir. 1980), and Pulliam v. Allen, 466 U.S. 522 (1984), judges can face personal and injunctive accountability.

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.

error: Content is protected !!