Equitable Subrogation and Trust Law The Hidden Remedy for Unjust Enrichment and Property Restitution

Equitable Subrogation and Trust Law: The Hidden Remedy for Unjust Enrichment and Property Restitution

Equitable Subrogation along with Natural Law and Trust Law is the Remedy to Stop the Unjust Enrichment. It is for the “Restitution” of our Private God Given Rights which is our PROPERTY. Subrogation means “Substitution”. That’s what the Banksters and the Fictional “STATE” did to our Mothers when they were “deceived” into “Registering” our PROPERTY — Our Equitable Rights and Remedies were Subrogated/Substituted.

This is how they “Presumed” themselves “Creditors”. In other words, they are now Playing Us and We are now Playing “presumed Debtors”.


🔍 The Discovery of Subrogation

It so happens that I found this tool, Ironically called Subrogation, in doing my due diligence in research, that Lawfully Reverses the “Fraud” and the Unjust Enrichment.

Maxim of Equity States:

“Equity aids the vigilant, and not those who slumber on their Rights.”


🧍‍♂️ The Role of the Living Man/Woman

This can only be done when we the “Living Man/Woman” STOP Volunteering.

Maxim of Equity States:

“Equity will not aid a Volunteer.”

By the way, One cannot mix UCC terms like “Secure Party Creditor” in Equity because we are the original Creditors already by Default without perfecting that position. Equity is not competing for any Lien or Security position.


⚖️ The Function of Surety and Subrogation

Look into Surety Equitable Subrogation further and you will see that every time the Surety Subrogee Creditor, who is also the True Beneficiary of the CQVTrust, Stops Volunteering by Discharging and Settling all Debt Obligations In the Private, Equity steps in and Subrogate[s] the Presumed Creditor/Beneficiary by Operation of Law.

Remember, in Subrogation, a “Subrogor” loses the “Claim” to seek Compensation. I am sure you will understand why that is.


🚪 The Limits of Corporate Fiction

The Corporate Fictions actors cannot do Equity, they have to come alive into the Private Jurisdiction, with “clean hands” to make or to challenge our Rightful Equitable Interest and Title.

As I stated before when I first contacted you, there are a lot of Folks out there teaching Equity and Common Law, yet they do not know anything about Surety/Subrogee Equitable Subrogation Rights. Even when you bring it for their attention, they refuse to do the “research”.

There is only one brother I know of who teaches Exclusive Equity and Subrogation — his name is at Amir_Law Academy.


🚫 The Caution on Mixing Jurisdictions

It is unwise to mix Equity and UCC.
Equity is God’s Law, Law of the Air, is above Land and Sea Law or Man-made Laws. It is Spiritual, in order to do Justice.


🔄 How Subrogation Operates

Simply stated:

When the Surety/Creditor/Subrogee Discharges the “Presumed” Debt “Lien” against our Cestui Que Vie Trust, Substitution/Subrogation takes place by Operation of Law — which means “Restitution” takes place and Recovery of our original position in the Constructive Trust, which is another Equitable Remedy for Breach of Trust.

Maxim of Equity States:

“Equity will not allow Statutes and codes to be used as a Cloke for FRAUD.”


💸 What Instrument Discharges the Lien?

When all of the Equitable Principles and “Rights” are understood — what monetary instrument will I be using as Surety/Subrogee/Creditor to “Pay off”, “Discharge”, or to “Purchase the Lien” against the Estate?


📜 The Promissory Note as Legal Tender

The Bill of Exchange Act 1882 describes the Promissory Note as “Cash”.

This is where I am — to learn how to perfect and write a Lawful Promissory Note as the Maker/Drawer/Indorser.

I am assuming that you have practical knowledge and experience of this operation in Reality, even though it wasn’t by Exclusive Equity.


🪙 The Intersection of Law and Commercial Remedy

The Bill of Exchange Act and HJR 192 together seem to be as good as Gold/Cash.

In conclusion, by simply Discharging the whole Debt with a Promissory Note by the Drawer, Maker, and Endorser as Surety/Subrogee/Creditor, in essence, means it’s subrogation time!!


👥 Understanding the 3-Party Relationship

According to the Bill of Exchange Act, the Bank is the “Drawee and Trustee” with a Fiduciary Duty, in this 3-Party Relationship.

🔚 Final Thoughts

In this construct of fiction layered upon fiction, Equity remains the highest jurisdiction, and subrogation is the lawful key to restoring what was taken through presumption, deception, and silence.

By understanding and applying Surety/Subrogee principles, we step back into our rightful roles — as creditors, as beneficiaries, and as the true parties in interest. When we act with clean hands, in honor, and with perfected security, Equity moves by operation of law, displacing every fraudulent claim and restoring the estate.

“He who comes to Equity must come with clean hands — but once he does, Equity does not sleep.”

The time for waiting is over. The remedy exists. We are the living authority.
Let those with eyes to see and minds to act, do so now.

In remedy, in honor, and in peace.

Leave your vote

3432879 points
More

Don’t Stop Here

More To Explore

Screen Shot 2025 07 08 at 9.35.01 PM

EMERGENCY PETITION FOR WRIT MANDAMUS VANISHES: Ninth Circuit Fraud, Tampering, Judicial Collusion, and a Federal Cover-Up Seems Unequivocal

Federal courts are now under scrutiny after a verified Writ of Mandamus vanished from the Ninth Circuit docket without explanation—raising grave concerns of judicial tampering, fraud, and systemic misconduct. Judge Sunshine Sykes defied clear jurisdictional divestiture by issuing rulings on a matter under appellate review, violating 28 U.S.C. § 144 and § 1651. This article exposes a disturbing pattern of ultra vires acts, denial of due process, and potential RICO violations implicating both district and appellate judges.Ask ChatGPT

lawful tender discharges the debt

When the Debt Is Discharged but the LIEN Remains: Why Auto and Home Loan Lenders Who Ignore Lawful Tender Are Committing Fraud and Commercial Crimes

This article delivers a devastating legal breakdown proving that lawful tender—once made and unrebutted—discharges auto loan debt under UCC §§ 3-601, 3-603, 3-310, 2-206, and 1-103, as codified in Cal. Com. Code §§ 3601, 3603, 3310, 2206, 1103, Fla. Stat. §§ 673.6011, 673.6031, 673.3101, 672.206, 671.103, and N.C.G.S. §§ 25-3-601, 25-3-603, 25-3-310, 25-2-206, 25-1-103. It exposes refusal to release a lien after lawful discharge as actionable fraud, conversion, embezzlement, and obstruction under state and federal law. With verified case law and commercial principles, it explains how silence equals acceptance and how creditors become commercially estopped. A must-read for secured parties, fiduciaries, and equity claimants demanding lien removal, declaratory relief, and commercial remedy.

Screen Shot 2025 06 28 at 4.55.33 PM

How a Perfected Security Agreement and UCC Filings Strip Servicers of Foreclosure Rights

A properly executed Security Agreement assigning all assets, rights, and interests to a private trust—paired with a UCC-1 financing statement and UCC-3 amendment claiming the Deed of Trust and Note—lawfully establishes the trust as the secured party and real party in interest. This perfected interest, under UCC §§ 9-203, 9-509, 3-301, and supported by controlling case law (e.g., Carpenter v. Longan, Ibanez, Veal), strips any servicer or third-party of standing to foreclose unless they possess the original Note, prove an unbroken chain of title, and rebut the trust’s perfected claim. Without that, all foreclosure attempts become void ab initio, commercial dishonor, and legal trespass on private trust property.

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.

error: Content is protected !!