Equitable Subrogation and Trust Law The Hidden Remedy for Unjust Enrichment and Property Restitution

Equitable Subrogation and Trust Law: The Hidden Remedy for Unjust Enrichment and Property Restitution

Equitable Subrogation along with Natural Law and Trust Law is the Remedy to Stop the Unjust Enrichment. It is for the “Restitution” of our Private God Given Rights which is our PROPERTY. Subrogation means “Substitution”. That’s what the Banksters and the Fictional “STATE” did to our Mothers when they were “deceived” into “Registering” our PROPERTY — Our Equitable Rights and Remedies were Subrogated/Substituted.

This is how they “Presumed” themselves “Creditors”. In other words, they are now Playing Us and We are now Playing “presumed Debtors”.


🔍 The Discovery of Subrogation

It so happens that I found this tool, Ironically called Subrogation, in doing my due diligence in research, that Lawfully Reverses the “Fraud” and the Unjust Enrichment.

Maxim of Equity States:

“Equity aids the vigilant, and not those who slumber on their Rights.”


🧍‍♂️ The Role of the Living Man/Woman

This can only be done when we the “Living Man/Woman” STOP Volunteering.

Maxim of Equity States:

“Equity will not aid a Volunteer.”

By the way, One cannot mix UCC terms like “Secure Party Creditor” in Equity because we are the original Creditors already by Default without perfecting that position. Equity is not competing for any Lien or Security position.


⚖️ The Function of Surety and Subrogation

Look into Surety Equitable Subrogation further and you will see that every time the Surety Subrogee Creditor, who is also the True Beneficiary of the CQVTrust, Stops Volunteering by Discharging and Settling all Debt Obligations In the Private, Equity steps in and Subrogate[s] the Presumed Creditor/Beneficiary by Operation of Law.

Remember, in Subrogation, a “Subrogor” loses the “Claim” to seek Compensation. I am sure you will understand why that is.


🚪 The Limits of Corporate Fiction

The Corporate Fictions actors cannot do Equity, they have to come alive into the Private Jurisdiction, with “clean hands” to make or to challenge our Rightful Equitable Interest and Title.

As I stated before when I first contacted you, there are a lot of Folks out there teaching Equity and Common Law, yet they do not know anything about Surety/Subrogee Equitable Subrogation Rights. Even when you bring it for their attention, they refuse to do the “research”.

There is only one brother I know of who teaches Exclusive Equity and Subrogation — his name is at Amir_Law Academy.


🚫 The Caution on Mixing Jurisdictions

It is unwise to mix Equity and UCC.
Equity is God’s Law, Law of the Air, is above Land and Sea Law or Man-made Laws. It is Spiritual, in order to do Justice.


🔄 How Subrogation Operates

Simply stated:

When the Surety/Creditor/Subrogee Discharges the “Presumed” Debt “Lien” against our Cestui Que Vie Trust, Substitution/Subrogation takes place by Operation of Law — which means “Restitution” takes place and Recovery of our original position in the Constructive Trust, which is another Equitable Remedy for Breach of Trust.

Maxim of Equity States:

“Equity will not allow Statutes and codes to be used as a Cloke for FRAUD.”


💸 What Instrument Discharges the Lien?

When all of the Equitable Principles and “Rights” are understood — what monetary instrument will I be using as Surety/Subrogee/Creditor to “Pay off”, “Discharge”, or to “Purchase the Lien” against the Estate?


📜 The Promissory Note as Legal Tender

The Bill of Exchange Act 1882 describes the Promissory Note as “Cash”.

This is where I am — to learn how to perfect and write a Lawful Promissory Note as the Maker/Drawer/Indorser.

I am assuming that you have practical knowledge and experience of this operation in Reality, even though it wasn’t by Exclusive Equity.


🪙 The Intersection of Law and Commercial Remedy

The Bill of Exchange Act and HJR 192 together seem to be as good as Gold/Cash.

In conclusion, by simply Discharging the whole Debt with a Promissory Note by the Drawer, Maker, and Endorser as Surety/Subrogee/Creditor, in essence, means it’s subrogation time!!


👥 Understanding the 3-Party Relationship

According to the Bill of Exchange Act, the Bank is the “Drawee and Trustee” with a Fiduciary Duty, in this 3-Party Relationship.

🔚 Final Thoughts

In this construct of fiction layered upon fiction, Equity remains the highest jurisdiction, and subrogation is the lawful key to restoring what was taken through presumption, deception, and silence.

By understanding and applying Surety/Subrogee principles, we step back into our rightful roles — as creditors, as beneficiaries, and as the true parties in interest. When we act with clean hands, in honor, and with perfected security, Equity moves by operation of law, displacing every fraudulent claim and restoring the estate.

“He who comes to Equity must come with clean hands — but once he does, Equity does not sleep.”

The time for waiting is over. The remedy exists. We are the living authority.
Let those with eyes to see and minds to act, do so now.

In remedy, in honor, and in peace.

Leave your vote

3432879 points
More

Don’t Stop Here

More To Explore

Fraud Upon the Court and Judicial Complicity: Judge Marquez Aids RICO Conspirators and Attempts to Punish "the People"

Fraud Upon the Court and Judicial Complicity: Judge Marquez Aids RICO Conspirators and Attempts to Punish “the People”

A federal RICO action filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California unveils a calculated scheme orchestrated by attorneys Barry Lee O’Connor and John Bailey, in concert with MARINAJ PROPERTIES and the Doumit family. The Verified Complaint lays out a detailed pattern of racketeering involving simulated legal proceedings, fraudulent conveyance, and theft of trust assets through a void and defective Trustee’s Deed. Despite perfected title claims and unrebutted affidavits establishing lawful ownership, Judge Rachel A. Marquez has enabled the misconduct by shielding culpable parties and targeting the rightful beneficiaries asserting their rights. The suit cites violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962 (RICO), 241 (conspiracy against rights), and 1341 (mail fraud), along with California Civil Code §§ 1709 (fraud) and 3346 (treble damages for wrongful injury to property). This case exemplifies judicial corruption—where bar-protected insiders act with impunity while private Americans are silenced. The court’s response will reveal whether justice, equity, and due process remain alive in California.

How the UCC is Codified in EVERY State: A State-by-State Codification of the UCC and Core Commercial Law Principles

How the UCC is Codified in EVERY State: A State-by-State Codification of the UCC and Core Commercial Law Principles

UCC §§ 1-103, 3-104, 3-601, and 3-603 operate as the foundation of lawful commercial remedy across all 50 states. Section 1-103 ensures equity, common law, and the Law Merchant remain enforceable alongside UCC processes. Section 3-104 defines what qualifies as a negotiable instrument—an essential element in debt discharge. Section 3-601 codifies the principle that all obligations can be discharged by contract, agreement, or valid performance. Section 3-603 delivers the lethal commercial strike: once lawful tender is made—even if refused—the obligation is discharged as a matter of law. These statutes, codified in every U.S. jurisdiction, are the legal artillery that allow secured parties and private trusts to assert control, tender discharge, and permanently terminate fraudulent or unperfected claims. Use them with precision—or be used by those who will.

20410479 329d 40a2 8d4d 492022986bb5

Void Means Void: When Judges Act Without Jurisdiction, Their Orders Are Legal Nullities

When a court acts without lawful jurisdiction—whether through improper removal, lack of subject matter or personal authority, or constitutional violations—its orders are void ab initio and carry no legal force. This article explains how judges who continue to issue rulings after losing jurisdiction are not merely mistaken—they are acting under color of law and are subject to direct civil liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Backed by black-letter case law and statutory authority, this piece dismantles the myth of absolute judicial immunity and affirms a fundamental truth in law: jurisdiction is everything. When it’s gone, so is the court’s power to act.

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.

error: Content is protected !!