Explained What is a Sovereign Citizen ?

Explained: What is a “Sovereign Citizen” ?

The term “Sovereign Citizen” is a weaponized slur and a derogatory, defamatory, and slanderous term used by incompetents, traitors, and terrorists, to describe a living man or woman whom comprehends that everything is commercial in nature, as evidenced by CFR § 27.11 and Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 of the U.S. Constitution, and claims to be a Sovereign however, they do not completely understand public and private law and possess the intelligence of that of a Sovereign.

The term “Sovereign Citizen” originated from patriots and Americans who reserve their rights, claim their estate and exemption from the United States, expatriate from the commercial democracy and remain in the private, de jure republic however, it has since been weaponized and has evolved into term used as propaganda by incompetents, traitors, and terrorists.

 

In General– typically/usually:

A “Sovereign Citizen” typically makes incorrect claims like stating they are an “American State National,” or “Sovereign Citizen,” or “State National,” instead of properly and correctly referring to themselves as a “national,” “non-citizen national,” “state Citizen,” “private citizen,” and/or “Sovereign.”

A “Sovereign Citizen” typically does not fully comprehend, House Joint Resolution 192 of June 5, 1933 public law 73-10.

A “Sovereign Citizen” typically does not fully comprehend, Gold Reserve Act of 1934, Public Law 73-87, Title III, Section 3.

A “Sovereign Citizen” typically does not fully comprehend, House Joint Resolution 348 Public Resolution, Number 63.

A “Sovereign Citizen” typically does not fully comprehend, Article 1, Section 10, of the U.S. Constitution.

A “Sovereign Citizen” typically does not fully comprehend, the “1940 Buck Act” and “Federal Areas.”

A “Sovereign Citizen” typically is dual-minded in their approach to public and private law and does not proceed sui juris, In Propria Persona, or by Special Limited Appearance.

A “Sovereign Citizen” typically could possibly be partially mentally incompetent and think they are their straw man/bank/person/individual/U.S. citizen.

A “Sovereign Citizen” typically claims to be a Sovereign, while still utilizing a “Social Security Number.”

A “Sovereign Citizen” typically claims to be a Sovereign, while receiving “benefits” and/or “privileges” from the United States.

A “Sovereign Citizen” typicallymakes incorrect statements and references to “Citizenship.”

A “Sovereign Citizen” typically is not capable of creating their own unsworn declarations “without the United States” in accordance with, 28 U.S. Code § 1746.

A “Sovereign Citizen” typically does not fully comprehend jurisdiction and how it can be obtained.

A “Sovereign Citizen” typically does not fully comprehend how to abate a matter.

A “Sovereign Citizen” typically does not reserve their rights in accordance with U.C.C. § 1-308 (formerly § 1-207).

A “Sovereign Citizen” typically is not capable of creating and completing a conditional acceptance on their own.

A “Sovereign Citizen” typically is not capable of completing an administrative procedure.

A “Sovereign Citizen” typically is not capable of assessing their own taxes and requires and relies significant assistance of a “Attorney In Fact.”

A “Sovereign Citizen” typically does not fully comprehend “minimum contacts” and/or “Invisible contracts.”

A “Sovereign Citizen” typically does not fully comprehend “offer and acceptance.”

A “Sovereign Citizen” typically does not fully comprehend “mailbox rule” aka “posting rule.’

A “Sovereign Citizen” typically tries to mix public and private law and do not know how to properly assert and exercise their rights.

A “Sovereign Citizen” typically places “blank indorsements” on all of their negotiable instruments, currency, and monetary instruments.

A “Sovereign Citizen” typically does know the different between a “right to travel” and “privilege of driving.”

A “Sovereign Citizen” typically claims to be a Sovereign but does not fully comprehend the “Sovereign Statutes” known as the “United States Code.”

A “Sovereign Citizen” typically claims to be a Sovereign but does not fully comprehend the “Uniform Commercial Code”

A “Sovereign Citizen” typically claims to be a Sovereign but is not a “secured party” and/or ‘secured creditor.”

A “Sovereign Citizen” typically claims to be a Sovereign but does not have their own private U.C.C. contract trust established to handle and maintain their own private banking ledger.

A “Sovereign Citizen” typically does not fully comprehend contract law, trust law, tax law, common law, Constitutional law, commerce, and banking.

Leave your vote

78313 points
More

Don’t Stop Here

More To Explore

Judges Can Be Sued: Public Servants, Oaths, and Liability Under the Clearfield Doctrine AND 42 U.S.C. 1983

Judges Can Be Sued: Public Servants, Oaths, and Liability Under the Clearfield Doctrine AND 42 U.S.C. 1983

Judges are not immune when they operate outside lawful jurisdiction, conspire under color of law, or engage in commercial enforcement without consent. Under the Clearfield Doctrine, they become corporate actors subject to liability like any private party. 42 U.S.C. § 1983 enables civil rights lawsuits against them individually, while 18 U.S.C. §§ 241–242 provides for criminal penalties for conspiracy and deprivation of rights. Through tort law, UCC, and case law like Rankin v. Howard, 633 F.2d 844 (9th Cir. 1980), and Pulliam v. Allen, 466 U.S. 522 (1984), judges can face personal and injunctive accountability.

FEDERAL EXPOSURE AND COMMERCIAL COLLAPSE: The Reckless Legal Simulation and RICO Fraud of Naji Doumit, Marinaj Properties LLC, and Their Counsel John Bailey of BAILEY LEGAL GROUP in Riverside County, California

FEDERAL EXPOSURE AND COMMERCIAL COLLAPSE: The Reckless Legal Simulation and RICO Fraud of Naji Doumit, Marinaj Properties LLC, and Their Counsel John Bailey of BAILEY LEGAL GROUP in Riverside County, California

A devastating legal and commercial collapse is underway for Naji Doumit, Marinaj Properties LLC, and their counsel following a Verified Response that dismantles their fraudulent Cross-Complaint. With unrebutted affidavits, perfected UCC filings, and binding conditional acceptance, the Plaintiffs have closed the commercial record and exposed the Defendants to over $100 million in liability. Unauthorized use of protected trademarks like KEVIN WALKER™ and DONNABELLE MORTEL™ now carries $1 million per-use penalties. The Cross-Complaint stands in dishonor, their legal position is void, and federal enforcement is imminent. There is no path to relief—only escalating consequences.

RIVERSIDE COUNTY RICO CHARGES and BOND CLAIM AND COLLAPSE: VERIFIED CLAIMS, CRIMINAL FRAUD, AND $1 TRILLION LIEN ENFORCEMENT IN MOTION FOR ALL BONDS

RIVERSIDE COUNTY RICO CHARGES and BOND CLAIM AND COLLAPSE: VERIFIED CLAIMS, CRIMINAL FRAUD, AND $1 TRILLION LIEN ENFORCEMENT IN MOTION FOR ALL BONDS

Riverside County officials, deputies, and unlicensed “commissioners” are now in verified default, dishonor, and commercial liability for unrebutted RICO, fraud, and color-of-law crimes. Kevin: Realworldfare has removed case MISW2501134 to federal court, triggering lien enforcement and formal demand for disclosure of liability bonds. Evidence includes unrebutted affidavits, a $1 trillion commercial lien, and documented bond fraud by inactive attorneys Jeremiah Raxter and Charles Rogers. Federal claims include kidnapping, extortion, impersonation, and deprivation of rights under 18 U.S.C. §§ 241–242, 1961–1964. Brady-listed deputies remain under active investigation. If justice is not delivered, top national officials will be named in new federal actions for willful neglect and complicity.

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.

error: Content is protected !!