Sworn Affidavits Uncover RICO Violations: Naji Doumit, FOCUS ESTATES, and Barry Lee O’Connor & Associates’ Mortgage Fraud Scheme Exposed
Sworn Affidavits Uncover RICO Violations: Naji Doumit, FOCUS ESTATES, and Barry Lee O’Connor & Associates’ Mortgage Fraud Scheme Exposed
Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Passive Income, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

Sworn affidavits reveal a massive real estate fraud scheme, exposing Naji Doumit, Barry Lee O’Connor & Associates, and MARINAJ PROPERTIES for RICO violations, fraudulent foreclosures, and property theft. Discover how fake Trustee’s Deeds and unlawful court filings were used to seize properties illegally.

Read more
Screen Shot 2025 03 22 at 5.58.03 PM
Kevin Walker Estate Exposes Judicial Fraud and Procedural Obstruction by Riverside Federal Court and Judge Jesus G. Bernal
Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

The Kevin Walker Estate has taken decisive legal action against what it describes as judicial fraud, conspiracy, and obstruction of justice within the United States District Court, Central District of California, Eastern Division. Despite filing a Verified Notice of Judicial Fraud, the court has failed to acknowledge it, further solidifying allegations of intentional misconduct and procedural bad faith.

Read more
How a W-2 Functions as a Gift to Your Employer and Relates to Gift & Estate Taxation: EPISODE 27
How a W-2 Functions as a Gift to Your Employer and Relates to Gift & Estate Taxation: EPISODE 27
Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

Many individuals are unaware that a W-2 form may function as an implied gift contract, classifying wages as voluntary transfers under IRS gift and estate tax rules. By signing a W-4, employees unknowingly authorize their earnings to be withheld and presumed as taxable income, potentially falling under estate and wealth transfer taxation per 26 U.S.C. § 2501 and § 2511. This article explores how W-2 wages align with Class 2 and Class 5 gift tax classifications, the silent trust relationship created by voluntary withholding, and how to rebut the presumption that earnings were gifted into the tax system. Understanding this hidden legal framework is essential for asserting proper tax classification and protecting your income.

Read more
Screen Shot 2025 03 14 at 9.39.57 AM
Wells Fargo’s Obvious Fraud Exposed as Unrebutted Affidavits Demand $1 Billion Summary Judgment
Categories
Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Passive Income, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Tips, Trust

Wells Fargo is now subject to a Demand for Summary Judgment after failing to rebut sworn affidavits, thereby admitting—by operation of law—to fraud, dishonor, and lack of standing. Under California law, summary judgment is mandatory when no triable issue of fact exists, and Wells Fargo’s silence serves as a legal admission of liability. This case highlights the bank’s documented history of foreclosure fraud, echoing past rulings where courts have dismissed their claims with prejudice.

Read more
Screen Shot 2025 03 02 at 2.00.39 PM
The Loan and Mortgage Illusion: How Your Signature Creates Money/Monetary Instruments and The Hidden Truth About Mortgages, Loans, and Banking: Episode 21
Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Tips, Trust

In this eye-opening episode of RealWorldFare, we break down the hidden truth about promissory notes, banking, and financial transactions that most people never question. When you sign a promissory note, are you really borrowing money—or funding the entire transaction yourself?

Read more
Screen Shot 2025 02 28 at 12.57.50 PM
The UCC Playbook: Unlocking the Power of Contract Law
Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Tips, Trust, Wealth

In a world where everything operates as a contract, understanding the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) can be the difference between being in control or being controlled. The UCC Playbook: How to Use Contract Law to Secure Your Assets, Family, Freedom, and Enforce Your Rights is a roadmap to reclaiming your financial and legal sovereignty.

Read more
Kevin Walker Estate Files Writ of Mandamus, Notice, and Order in Federal Case Demanding Court Enforce $1.1 Billion Contract and Default Judgment, and Sanctions Against Dishonorable Defendants
Kevin Walker Estate Files Writ of Mandamus, Notice, and Order in Federal Case Demanding Court Enforce $1.1 Billion Contract and Default Judgment, and Sanctions Against Dishonorable Defendants
Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

The Kevin Walker Estate, et al., has intensified its legal fight for rights, accountability, and justice by filing a Writ of Mandamus and an Order Granting Default and Summary Judgment, demanding the court enforce Defendants’ binding default and immediate liability for $1.1 billion. The court has already identified PHH Mortgage Services’ Motion to Dismiss as procedurally defective and subject to striking, further evidencing Defendants’ dishonor. With Chevron deference overturned, the court is bound to rule strictly on constitutional and statutory law, without arbitrary dismissal. Should the court fail to act, Plaintiffs are prepared to escalate the matter through appellate relief, federal enforcement, and sanctions for obstruction of justice. This case has the potential to establish a landmark precedent in ensuring financial institutions and courts adhere to the rule of law.

The Kevin Walker Estate, et al., has intensified its legal fight for rights, accountability, and justice by filing a Writ of Mandamus and an Order Granting Default and Summary Judgment, demanding the court enforce Defendants’ binding default and immediate liability for $1.1 billion. The court has already identified PHH Mortgage Services’ Motion to Dismiss as procedurally defective and subject to striking, further evidencing Defendants’ dishonor. With Chevron deference overturned, the court is bound to rule strictly on constitutional and statutory law, without arbitrary dismissal. Should the court fail to act, Plaintiffs are prepared to escalate the matter through appellate relief, federal enforcement, and sanctions for obstruction of justice. This case has the potential to establish a landmark precedent in ensuring financial institutions and courts adhere to the rule of law.

Read more
How to Lawfully Represent Your 'Trust' as an Attorney in Fact in Accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1654, U.C.C. § 3 402, and Article 1 Section 10 of the Constitution
How to Lawfully Represent Your ‘Trust’ as an “Attorney-in-Fact” in Accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1654, U.C.C. § 3-402, and Article 1 Section 10 of the Constitution
Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Tips, Trust

The authority to represent a trust as an attorney-in-fact is firmly established under federal law, the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), and longstanding legal precedent. Contrary to common misconceptions, a trust operates as a contractual entity, granting it the ability to be lawfully represented by an authorized agent, including an attorney-in-fact. This article explores the legal framework affirming this right, highlights key statutory provisions, and provides strategies for enforcing it against courts and financial institutions that unlawfully challenge or deny such authority.

The authority to represent a trust as an attorney-in-fact is firmly established under federal law, the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), and longstanding legal precedent. Contrary to common misconceptions, a trust operates as a contractual entity, granting it the ability to be lawfully represented by an authorized agent, including an attorney-in-fact. This article explores the legal framework affirming this right, highlights key statutory provisions, and provides strategies for enforcing it against courts and financial institutions that unlawfully challenge or deny such authority.

Read more
PHH Mortgage Corporation's Motion to Dismiss in Kevin Walker Estate, et al. v. PHH Mortgage Corporation, et al. is a glaring example of procedural misconduct, constitutional violations, and a deliberate attempt to obstruct justice. The Plaintiffs have conditionally accepted PHH Mortgage’s non-compliant filing, thereby tendering a binding counteroffer that PHH must now rebut. PHH’s continued silence and failure to rebut the conditional acceptance further compounds their non-performance and dishonor. Additionally, the Defendants’ filing violates multiple-defendant court rules, misrepresents the law, displays incompetence and a war against the Constitution, and constitutes blatant obstruction of justice.
KEVIN WALKER ESTATE’S Conditional Acceptance Exposes PHH Mortgage’s Motion as Procedurally Defective, Deceitful and Dishonest, Unconstitutional, and Legally Void
Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

PHH Mortgage Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss in Kevin Walker Estate, et al. v. PHH Mortgage Corporation, et al. is a glaring example of procedural misconduct, constitutional violations, and a deliberate attempt to obstruct justice. The Plaintiffs have conditionally accepted PHH Mortgage’s non-compliant filing, thereby tendering a binding counteroffer that PHH must now rebut. PHH’s continued silence and failure to rebut the conditional acceptance further compounds their non-performance and dishonor. Additionally, the Defendants’ filing, prepared by Neil J. Cooper of HOUSER LLP, violates multiple-defendant court rules, misrepresents the law, displays incompetence and a war against the Constitution, and constitutes blatant obstruction of justice.

Further exacerbating this obstruction, critical documents remain missing from the court docket and record, preventing a full and fair adjudication of the Plaintiffs’ claims. This deliberate suppression of filings by the court and Defendants undermines due process, conceals key evidence, and constitutes judicial misconduct. The failure to properly record and acknowledge Plaintiffs’ filings further demonstrates systematic efforts to manipulate the proceedings in PHH Mortgage’s favor, reinforcing the need for immediate judicial correction, sanctions, and enforcement of Plaintiffs’ default judgment demands.

Read more
DOJ Dismantles Unconstitutional Barriers Protecting Corrupt Administrative Judges
DOJ Dismantles Unconstitutional Barriers Protecting Corrupt Administrative “Judges”
Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

The Department of Justice (DOJ) has concluded that restrictions on the removal of Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) are unconstitutional, referencing the Supreme Court’s ruling in Free Enterprise Fund v. PCAOB. Acting Solicitor General Sarah Harris notified Senate President Pro Tempore Charles Grassley that the DOJ will no longer defend these protections in court. DOJ Chief of Staff Chad Mizelle emphasized that unelected ALJs have wielded excessive authority without accountability for too long and must be answerable to the President and the American people.

Read more
Judicial Misconduct in Riverside, California: Defendant PHH Mortgage's ("loan servicer") Baseless Motion and the Court’s Obstruction of Justice
Judicial Misconduct in Riverside, California: Defendant PHH Mortgage’s (“loan servicer”) Baseless Motion and the Court’s Obstruction of Justice
Categories
Business, Constitution, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust, Wealth

PHH Mortgage’s Motion to Dismiss in Kevin Walker Estate, et al. v. PHH Mortgage Corporation, et al. exemplifies judicial overreach, procedural abuse, and a blatant disregard for constitutional rights. The motion falsely asserts that a trust cannot be represented by an attorney-in-fact, denying individuals their right to self-representation and claiming that only “attorneys at law” can act in court. This contradicts established legal principles, including the American Bar Association’s recognition of power of attorney as a legitimate instrument granting broad authority. Additionally, the court has obstructed the record by refusing to file Plaintiffs’ documents, prompting a writ of mandamus to expose the Riverside Federal Court’s misconduct. This case underscores a broader pattern of legal corruption, defamation, and deprivation of rights under the color of law.

Read more
Screen Shot 2025 02 19 at 1.22.22 PM
KEVIN WALKER Estate Demands Writ of Mandamus as Riverside Federal Court Engages in Corruption, Record Tampering, and Obstruction of Justice
Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

The United States District Court, Central District of California (Riverside), stands accused of obstructing justice, tampering with records, and violating due process by unlawfully refusing to file and docket legitimate pleadings. Plaintiffs KEVIN WALKER ESTATE, et al., hav presented irrefutable evidence of judicial misconduct, calling for criminal prosecution, sanctions, and immediate enforcement. Despite proof of receipt, court officials have concealed filings, manipulated records, and obstructed legal proceedings, in direct violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1505, 1512, 1519, and 2071. With Pam Bondi CC’d on the correspondence, high-level authorities have been alerted to this grave constitutional violation that threatens judicial integrity and fundamental rights.

Read more