What a California Court Commissioner Really Is and how Charles Rogers Jeremiah Raxter are Engaged in RICO and Felonies in Riverside California 1 1
Riverside, California: What a California Court Commissioner Really Is and how Fraudulent “Commissioner” Charles Rogers, Jeremiah Raxter are Engaged in RICO and Felonies
Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

Charles Rogers (Bar #64530) and Jeremiah D. Raxter (Bar #276811) are engaged in an ongoing scheme of judicial fraud and racketeering in Riverside County, California. Both individuals are inactive members of the California State Bar and have no lawful authority to act as judges or commissioners. Their acts — including issuing bench warrants, signing orders, and presiding over court matters — are void ab initio and constitute federal felonies under 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242, and 1962. Their actions represent a criminal enterprise under color of law, demanding immediate investigation, disbarment, and prosecution. Public notice is hereby given that all their proceedings are fraudulent and without legal force.

Read more
Criminal RICO Syndicate in Riverside County, California: How Lawyers Posing as “Judges,” Clerks, and Deputies Form an Ongoing Enterprise of Fraud, Obstruction, and Human Rights Violations — 42 USC 1984, 18 USC 241-242, RICO, Extortion and more
Organized Judicial Racketeering in Southern California: How Attorneys Masquerading as Judges Collude with Clerks and Sheriffs to Perpetrate Fraud, Extortion, and Civil Rights Violations Under Color of Law
Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

This exposé reveals a coordinated RICO enterprise operating within Riverside County’s justice system, naming Sheriff Chad Bianco, DA Michael Hestrin, Commissioner Tamara L. Wagner, and others for systemic fraud, extortion, and deprivation of rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. It further exposes U.S. District Judge Jesus G. Bernal for judicial obstruction and record concealment, constituting willful interference in violation of federal due process. Backed by an active federal RICO lawsuit under 18 U.S.C. § 1962 before Judge Wesley Hsu, the article outlines a pattern of racketeering, forged instruments, false filings, and unlawful evictions. Officials including Pam Bondi, Rob Bonta, Kash Patel, and the FBI have been formally notified but remain silent. This is not isolated misconduct—it is organized crime under color of law. The piece stands as both public notice and evidentiary documentation for further federal action.

Read more
RICO-Fueled Courtroom Corruption in Riverside: Attorney Tamara L. Wagner Implicated for Fraud and Abuse of Office
RICO-Fueled Courtroom Corruption in Riverside: Attorney Tamara L. Wagner Implicated for Fraud and Abuse of Office
Categories
Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

Tamara L. Wagner (CA Bar #188613), a licensed attorney acting as a judicial officer in Riverside County, is now at the center of a federal removal action citing judicial fraud, civil rights violations, and RICO conspiracy. Defendants allege she is unlawfully practicing law from the bench without constitutional authority, advancing proceedings in open dishonor. Verified affidavits, UCC filings, and summary judgment demands were ignored, leading to claims of railroading and systemic court corruption. The case, removed under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1441, 1443, and 1446, is now pending in federal court.

Read more
Fraud, Color of Law, and RICO Violations by Attorney Monika Vermani (Bar #355080) Exposed in Riverside County, California
Fraud, Color of Law, and RICO Violations by Attorney Monika Vermani (Bar #355080) Exposed in Riverside County, California
Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

Attorney Monika Vermani (CA Bar #355080) has been formally named in a high-level commercial fraud and racketeering operation involving Riverside County’s unlawful prosecution of a secured private trust estate. Verified affidavits, unrebutted notices, and perfected UCC filings establish that Vermani is proceeding without lawful jurisdiction, operating under color of law, and aiding in the unauthorized securitization and monetization of private estate assets. The record demands $100 million in damages, immediate dismissal with prejudice, and criminal prosecution under 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242, and 1961–1968 (RICO). This case exposes a systemic pattern of commercial fraud, identity theft, and administrative conspiracy masquerading as routine judicial process.

Attorney Monika Vermani (CA Bar #355080) has been formally named in a high-level commercial fraud and racketeering operation involving Riverside County’s unlawful prosecution of a secured private trust estate. Verified affidavits, unrebutted notices, and perfected UCC filings establish that Vermani is proceeding without lawful jurisdiction, operating under color of law, and aiding in the unauthorized securitization and monetization of private estate assets. The record demands $100 million in damages, immediate dismissal with prejudice, and criminal prosecution under 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242, and 1961–1968 (RICO). This case exposes a systemic pattern of commercial fraud, identity theft, and administrative conspiracy masquerading as routine judicial process.

Read more
252Is a U.S. Citizen an Authorized Representative of the United States?
Is a U.S. Citizen an Authorized Representative of the United States?
Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust, Wealth

A U.S. citizen does not possess agency on behalf of the United States government unless expressly appointed by statute, contract, or lawful delegation. Mere citizenship does not establish authority to act for or represent the federal government in any legal or commercial capacity. In reality, the U.S. citizen is the governed and regulated party—operating under federal jurisdiction, not within it. Only properly delegated agents—such as public officers, attorneys, or fiduciaries acting under written authority—may speak or act on behalf of the United States. Recognizing this separation is essential in all matters involving legal standing, jurisdiction, and commercial equity.

Read more
2How to Convene a 12 Panel Grand Jury Citizen Authority vs. State Monopoly
How to Convene a 12-Panel Grand Jury: Citizen Authority vs. State Monopoly
Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, News, Realworldfare, Securities, Sovereigns, Trust

Learn how private citizens can lawfully initiate grand jury investigations through both statutory and common law means. This article explains the difference between court-convened grand juries and citizen-led panels formed under First Amendment and natural law authority. From submitting affidavits to the U.S. Attorney under 18 U.S.C. § 3332(a), to organizing lawful assemblies that issue true bills, the guide walks through each step. It empowers those facing systemic fraud, corruption, or due process violations with a lawful path to remedy. Grand juries are not just for prosecutors—they are a tool for the people.

Read more
Zillow, Title Fraud, and the Engineered Dispossession of Private Property
Zillow, Title Fraud, and the Engineered Dispossession of Private Property
Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Sovereigns, Trust

Zillow functions as a data monopoly that omits Grant Deeds, Warranty Deeds, and equitable liens from its property reports—concealing true ownership while promoting foreclosure narratives. This article exposes how Zillow, in collusion with county agencies like Riverside County, helps institutional actors ignore lawful private trust conveyances. Public records confirm that MEMORY STARBURST TRUST and WG PRIVATE IRREVOCABLE TRUST lawfully conveyed title, yet those transactions are suppressed under color of law. The result is a fraudulent appearance of foreclosure legitimacy, violating due process and facilitating commercial theft. Zillow’s omission isn’t accidental—it’s a systemic framework of fraud, dishonor, and property rights abuse masked as public information.

Read more
Appeal Filed in Walker Estate Action: Exposing Procedural Fraud, Concealment, and Constitutional Violations
Appeal Filed in Walker Estate Action: Exposing Procedural Fraud, Concealment, and Constitutional Violations
Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Sovereigns, Tips, Trust

On April 2, 2025, the Plaintiffs in Kevin Walker Estate, et al. v. Jay Promisco, et al., Case No. 5:25-cv-00339-JGB, formally filed a Verified Notice of Appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. This filing is not just a procedural formality—it outlines a detailed and extensive challenge to what Plaintiffs describe as gross procedural errors, record tampering, suppression of filings, and constitutional violations by both court officers and defendants.

Read more
Equitable Subrogation and Trust Law The Hidden Remedy for Unjust Enrichment and Property Restitution
Equitable Subrogation and Trust Law: The Hidden Remedy for Unjust Enrichment and Property Restitution
Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Sovereigns, Tips, Trust

Equitable Subrogation along with Natural Law and Trust Law is the Remedy to Stop the Unjust Enrichment. It is for the “Restitution” of our Private God Given Rights which is our PROPERTY. Subrogation means “Substitution”. That’s what the Banksters and the Fictional “STATE” did to our Mothers when they were “deceived” into “Registering” our PROPERTY — Our Equitable Rights and Remedies were Subrogated/Substituted.

Read more
DISCHARGE -- assign debt to Department of Treasury - 31 USC 3123 - 31 USC 5118 - HJR 192 OF 1933 - UCC 3601 AND 3603
Unlocking Treasury Discharge: How Private Americans Can Lawfully Set Off Debt
Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Trust, Wealth

Few Americans realize that in 1933, the U.S. government eliminated real money—but also provided a remedy: the ability to discharge debt through lawful assignment. Under 31 U.S.C. §§ 3123 and 5118, private individuals can lawfully tender value and assign obligations to the U.S. Treasury for dollar-for-dollar discharge, utilizing the same credit-based system banks use every day. This isn’t theory — it’s codified law, commercial equity, and constitutional remedy in motion. When you perfect your interest, assign the obligation, and document the discharge, you don’t just resolve your own debt—you actively contribute to reducing the public burden. The only thing missing? The awareness that it’s been your lawful right all along.

Read more
equity
Perfected Claim, Perfected Remedy: How to Enforce Your Rights After Foreclosure
Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Tips, Trust, Wealth

Equity is a parallel legal system grounded in conscience, fairness, and moral justice, developed to address the limitations and rigidity of common law. It offers remedies where legal (monetary) relief is insufficient—such as injunctions, constructive trusts, and specific performance. Equity acts upon the person rather than the property (in personam), and is guided by enduring maxims, including: “He who comes into equity must come with clean hands” and “Equity regards as done that which ought to be done.” It ensures that rights are enforced not merely by law, but by what is just and honorable.

Read more
Contract by Conduct Offer, Acceptance, and Equity in Home and Auto Sales
Contract by Conduct: Offer, Acceptance, and Equity in Home and Auto Sales
Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust, Wealth

This article explains how contracts can be formed through conduct, communication, and performance — even without a signature — under common law, equity, and the UCC. It highlights how real estate and auto sales can become legally binding when an offer is made, payment is tendered, and the other party accepts by silence or action. Citing UCC §§ 2-204, 2-206, and 1-103, the article shows how equity enforces what “ought to be done” when formalities are absent but intent and performance are clear.

Read more