RICO-Fueled Courtroom Corruption in Riverside: Attorney Tamara L. Wagner Implicated for Fraud and Abuse of Office

RICO-Fueled Courtroom Corruption in Riverside: Attorney Tamara L. Wagner Implicated for Fraud and Abuse of Office

Tamara L. Wagner (CA Bar #188613), a licensed attorney acting as a judicial officer in Riverside County, is now at the center of a federal removal action citing judicial fraud, civil rights violations, and RICO conspiracy. Defendants allege she is unlawfully practicing law from the bench without constitutional authority, advancing proceedings in open dishonor. Verified affidavits, UCC filings, and summary judgment demands were ignored, leading to claims of railroading and systemic court corruption. The case, removed under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1441, 1443, and 1446, is now pending in federal court.

🚨 Judicial Railroading & Fraud in Riverside County

Tamara L. Wagner (CA Bar #188613) Named in RICO-Based Federal Removal for Practicing Law from the Bench


The Case That Exposed a Cartel of Courtroom Corruption in California

In a bold legal maneuver now gaining national traction, LWY RIDERS LLC and NEW BEGINNINGS TRUST have filed a Notice of Removal to the United States District Court. The filing, backed by federal statutes and verified exhibits, accuses Tamara Lucile Wagner, an active California-licensed attorney (Bar Profile Link: https://apps.calbar.ca.gov/attorney/Licensee/Detail/188613), of engaging in judicial fraud, conspiracy, procedural dishonor, commercial trespass, and civil racketeering while presiding over proceedings in Riverside County Superior Court.

Judicial Railroading and Fraud: Tamara L. Wagner (CA Bar #188613) Named in RICO-Based Federal Removal for Practicing Law from the Bench and Orchestrating Fraudulent Proceedings in Riverside County

Judicial Railroading and Fraud: Tamara L. Wagner (CA Bar #188613) Named in RICO-Based Federal Removal for Practicing Law from the Bench and Orchestrating Fraudulent Proceedings in Riverside County

Judicial Railroading and Fraud: Tamara L. Wagner (CA Bar #188613) Named in RICO-Based Federal Removal for Practicing Law from the Bench and Orchestrating Fraudulent Proceedings in Riverside County

Judicial Railroading and Fraud: Tamara L. Wagner (CA Bar #188613) Named in RICO-Based Federal Removal for Practicing Law from the Bench and Orchestrating Fraudulent Proceedings in Riverside County

 


🛑 A Commissioner Posing as a Judge

Despite presenting herself as a judicial officer, Tamara L. Wagner (CA Bar #188613) is not a constitutionally appointed judge. According to the California State Bar, Wagner is a licensed attorney and commissioner — not an Article III or Article VI judge. Yet, she continues to practice law from the bench, issuing rulings, advancing proceedings, and attempting to preside over a quiet title dispute without lawful judicial authority or a binding oath of office.

This conduct is now being lawfully challenged as a violation of:

  • Canon 3 of the Code of Judicial Conduct,

  • Article VI, § 1 of the California Constitution, and

  • federal civil rights law, including 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242 (criminal conspiracy and deprivation of rights under color of law).


📄 Unrebutted Filings Ignored: Summary Judgment Denied

On April 7, 2025, Defendants submitted verified affidavits, commercial filings, and demands for summary judgment (see Exhibit O) under UCC §§ 3-505, 3-603, and CCP § 437c. These documents—served via Registered Mail—were ignored by the state court, which failed to docket, hear, or honor the unrebutted facts on record.

By law, unrebutted affidavits stand as truth in commerce. The court’s silence constitutes dishonor, and its decision to proceed despite lack of jurisdiction or evidence is not merely negligent—it is constructive fraud.

 

 


🚂 Judicial Railroading in Action

With no verified complaint, no proper service of process, no standing, and no jurisdiction, the court nonetheless set the matter for trial—a textbook case of judicial railroading. Advancing a trial in the face of perfected, unrebutted affidavits and lawful objections not only violates federal due process—it constitutes actionable fraud upon the court (Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238).

The Defendants allege that Wagner’s conduct is part of a pattern and practice within Riverside County where judicial officers collude with corporate plaintiffs and court clerks to operate what has now been called a “courtroom cartel”—one that engages in mail fraud, administrative railroading, and commercial theft of trust-held property.


⚖️ Federal Response: RICO, Civil Rights, and Removal

On April 24, 2025, the Real Parties in Interest removed the action to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California under:

  • 28 U.S.C. § 1441 – Federal question jurisdiction

  • 28 U.S.C. § 1443 – Denial of federally protected rights

  • 28 U.S.C. § 1446 – Timely removal

  • 42 U.S.C. § 1983 – Civil rights violations

  • 18 U.S.C. §§ 241–242 – Criminal conspiracy and rights deprivation

  • 18 U.S.C. § 1962 – Civil RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act)

These statutes apply due to a clear record of procedural abuse, refusal to recognize perfected filings, and the unauthorized legal actions by Tamara L. Wagner acting ultra vires—outside her lawful capacity.


🛡️ What’s at Stake: Trust Property, Sovereignty, and Due Process

This is more than a civil dispute—it is a direct confrontation between private trust estate sovereignty and a rogue administrative judiciary operating in violation of state and federal law.

At the heart of the case is 1a property lawfully conveyed to a private trust, secured by UCC-1 filings, a recorded Grant Deed, and unrebutted affidavits. Yet the state court, without authority, continues to facilitate what Defendants call a “racketeering campaign to strip beneficiaries of lawful title and secured equity.”


📢 What Happens Next

With removal perfected, the state court is divested of jurisdiction. The case is now under review by a proper Article III federal court, where allegations of:

  • Judicial fraud,

  • Unauthorized practice of law,

  • Procedural railroading, and

  • Civil RICO violations

will be addressed on the federal record.


For official source reference on Tamara L. Wagner’s license, visit:
👉 https://apps.calbar.ca.gov/attorney/Licensee/Detail/188613

Leave your vote

2647283 points
More

Don’t Stop Here

More To Explore

Judges Can Be Sued: Public Servants, Oaths, and Liability Under the Clearfield Doctrine AND 42 U.S.C. 1983

Judges Can Be Sued: Public Servants, Oaths, and Liability Under the Clearfield Doctrine AND 42 U.S.C. 1983

Judges are not immune when they operate outside lawful jurisdiction, conspire under color of law, or engage in commercial enforcement without consent. Under the Clearfield Doctrine, they become corporate actors subject to liability like any private party. 42 U.S.C. § 1983 enables civil rights lawsuits against them individually, while 18 U.S.C. §§ 241–242 provides for criminal penalties for conspiracy and deprivation of rights. Through tort law, UCC, and case law like Rankin v. Howard, 633 F.2d 844 (9th Cir. 1980), and Pulliam v. Allen, 466 U.S. 522 (1984), judges can face personal and injunctive accountability.

FEDERAL EXPOSURE AND COMMERCIAL COLLAPSE: The Reckless Legal Simulation and RICO Fraud of Naji Doumit, Marinaj Properties LLC, and Their Counsel John Bailey of BAILEY LEGAL GROUP in Riverside County, California

FEDERAL EXPOSURE AND COMMERCIAL COLLAPSE: The Reckless Legal Simulation and RICO Fraud of Naji Doumit, Marinaj Properties LLC, and Their Counsel John Bailey of BAILEY LEGAL GROUP in Riverside County, California

A devastating legal and commercial collapse is underway for Naji Doumit, Marinaj Properties LLC, and their counsel following a Verified Response that dismantles their fraudulent Cross-Complaint. With unrebutted affidavits, perfected UCC filings, and binding conditional acceptance, the Plaintiffs have closed the commercial record and exposed the Defendants to over $100 million in liability. Unauthorized use of protected trademarks like KEVIN WALKER™ and DONNABELLE MORTEL™ now carries $1 million per-use penalties. The Cross-Complaint stands in dishonor, their legal position is void, and federal enforcement is imminent. There is no path to relief—only escalating consequences.

RIVERSIDE COUNTY RICO CHARGES and BOND CLAIM AND COLLAPSE: VERIFIED CLAIMS, CRIMINAL FRAUD, AND $1 TRILLION LIEN ENFORCEMENT IN MOTION FOR ALL BONDS

RIVERSIDE COUNTY RICO CHARGES and BOND CLAIM AND COLLAPSE: VERIFIED CLAIMS, CRIMINAL FRAUD, AND $1 TRILLION LIEN ENFORCEMENT IN MOTION FOR ALL BONDS

Riverside County officials, deputies, and unlicensed “commissioners” are now in verified default, dishonor, and commercial liability for unrebutted RICO, fraud, and color-of-law crimes. Kevin: Realworldfare has removed case MISW2501134 to federal court, triggering lien enforcement and formal demand for disclosure of liability bonds. Evidence includes unrebutted affidavits, a $1 trillion commercial lien, and documented bond fraud by inactive attorneys Jeremiah Raxter and Charles Rogers. Federal claims include kidnapping, extortion, impersonation, and deprivation of rights under 18 U.S.C. §§ 241–242, 1961–1964. Brady-listed deputies remain under active investigation. If justice is not delivered, top national officials will be named in new federal actions for willful neglect and complicity.

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.

error: Content is protected !!