What a California Court Commissioner Really Is and how Charles Rogers Jeremiah Raxter are Engaged in RICO and Felonies in Riverside California 1 1

Riverside, California: What a California Court Commissioner Really Is and how Fraudulent “Commissioner” Charles Rogers, Jeremiah Raxter are Engaged in RICO and Felonies

Charles Rogers (Bar #64530) and Jeremiah D. Raxter (Bar #276811) are engaged in an ongoing scheme of judicial fraud and racketeering in Riverside County, California. Both individuals are inactive members of the California State Bar and have no lawful authority to act as judges or commissioners. Their acts — including issuing bench warrants, signing orders, and presiding over court matters — are void ab initio and constitute federal felonies under 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242, and 1962. Their actions represent a criminal enterprise under color of law, demanding immediate investigation, disbarment, and prosecution. Public notice is hereby given that all their proceedings are fraudulent and without legal force.

In Riverside County, California, individuals Charles Rogers (California Bar #64530) and Jeremiah D. Raxter (California Bar #276811) are engaged in a blatant and ongoing scheme of judicial fraud, unauthorized practice of law, and systematic deprivation of rights under color of law.

Both Rogers and Raxter are currently inactive members of the California State Bar and thus have no lawful authority to act as judges, commissioners, or officers of the court. Their actions in presiding over court proceedings, issuing warrants, signing orders, and exercising judicial powers are executed without lawful authority and are VOID AB INITIO — having no legal force or effect from inception.

  • Charles Rogers (Bar #64530), listed as a “judge,” is currently an inactive member of the California State Bar and has no lawful authority to preside over judicial proceedings. Acting without a valid license is a felony under California Business and Professions Code §§ 6125 and 6126.

Public Notice of Criminal Enterprise, RICO Violations, and Systematic Fraud Committed by John Charles Rogers, Jeremiah D. Raxter, and Monika Vermani in Riverside County

 

 

 

  • Jeremiah D. Raxter(Bar #276811), purporting to act as a “commissioner,” is likewise an inactive member of the California State Bar and has no authority to issue orders or warrants. His acts include the illegal issuance of a bench warrant without jurisdiction, rendering all acts VOID AB INITIO.

Public Notice of Criminal Enterprise, RICO Violations, and Systematic Fraud Committed by John Charles Rogers, Jeremiah D. Raxter, and Monika Vermani in Riverside County

⚖️ Summary of Violations:

 

Issue Reality
Must commissioners and judges be active licensed attorneys? ✅ Yes, mandatory under California law
Are Rogers and Raxter actively licensed? ❌ No, both are inactive and unauthorized
Are their judicial acts lawful? ❌ No, their acts are null and void
Is acting without a license a crime? ✅ Yes, felony under California Business and Professions Code § 6126
Are these acts violations of federal civil rights? ✅ Yes, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, and 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242

📜 Criminal and Civil Violations Committed:

  • Unauthorized Practice of Law — California Business and Professions Code §§ 6125, 6126

  • Fraudulent Personation of Judicial Officers — California Penal Code § 115

  • Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law — 18 U.S.C. § 242

  • Conspiracy Against Rights — 18 U.S.C. § 241

  • Obstruction of Justice — 18 U.S.C. § 1503

  • Racketeering (RICO Activity) — 18 U.S.C. § 1962

  • Extortion Under Color of Official Right — 18 U.S.C. § 872

 


📜 Elements of the Criminal Racketeering Enterprise:

 

Element Facts
Predicate Acts Unauthorized practice, issuance of void legal instruments, deprivation of rights
Pattern of Racketeering Activity Multiple related acts of fraud and extortion under guise of judicial authority
Enterprise Public offices (courts) used as fronts for unauthorized and criminal operations
Conspiracy Coordination and concealment of unlawful status to extract fines, penalties, and control over property

 


🛑 Legal Status of Their Acts:

  • Any orders, warrants, judgments, or rulings issued by Rogers or Raxter are null, void, and unenforceable.

  • Their actions constitute federal felonies and expose them to immediate civil and criminal liability.

  • Their continued operation under color of law creates ongoing violations of the United States Constitution, California Constitution, and multiple statutory protections.

 


🚨 Public Demand:

Immediate investigation, removal from any position of purported authority, disbarment proceedings, criminal indictment, and civil rights enforcement actions are warranted against Charles Rogers and Jeremiah D. Raxter based on their ongoing fraud and criminal misconduct under color of law.


Conclusion:

The public is hereby noticed that Charles Rogers and Jeremiah D. Raxter are acting unlawfully, without jurisdiction, and without proper license authority.
Their actions represent a clear and present threat to due process, constitutional protections, and the lawful administration of justice in California.

All affected parties are urged to challenge any proceedings presided over by these individuals and to demand immediate vacatur of all fraudulent and void orders issued under their unauthorized authority.

Leave your vote

3838892 points
More

Don’t Stop Here

More To Explore

What a California Court Commissioner Really Is and how Charles Rogers Jeremiah Raxter are Engaged in RICO and Felonies in Riverside California 1 1

Riverside, California: What a California Court Commissioner Really Is and how Fraudulent “Commissioner” Charles Rogers, Jeremiah Raxter are Engaged in RICO and Felonies

Charles Rogers (Bar #64530) and Jeremiah D. Raxter (Bar #276811) are engaged in an ongoing scheme of judicial fraud and racketeering in Riverside County, California. Both individuals are inactive members of the California State Bar and have no lawful authority to act as judges or commissioners. Their acts — including issuing bench warrants, signing orders, and presiding over court matters — are void ab initio and constitute federal felonies under 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242, and 1962. Their actions represent a criminal enterprise under color of law, demanding immediate investigation, disbarment, and prosecution. Public notice is hereby given that all their proceedings are fraudulent and without legal force.

Criminal RICO Syndicate in Riverside County, California: How Lawyers Posing as “Judges,” Clerks, and Deputies Form an Ongoing Enterprise of Fraud, Obstruction, and Human Rights Violations — 42 USC 1984, 18 USC 241-242, RICO, Extortion and more

Organized Judicial Racketeering in Southern California: How Attorneys Masquerading as Judges Collude with Clerks and Sheriffs to Perpetrate Fraud, Extortion, and Civil Rights Violations Under Color of Law

This exposé reveals a coordinated RICO enterprise operating within Riverside County’s justice system, naming Sheriff Chad Bianco, DA Michael Hestrin, Commissioner Tamara L. Wagner, and others for systemic fraud, extortion, and deprivation of rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. It further exposes U.S. District Judge Jesus G. Bernal for judicial obstruction and record concealment, constituting willful interference in violation of federal due process. Backed by an active federal RICO lawsuit under 18 U.S.C. § 1962 before Judge Wesley Hsu, the article outlines a pattern of racketeering, forged instruments, false filings, and unlawful evictions. Officials including Pam Bondi, Rob Bonta, Kash Patel, and the FBI have been formally notified but remain silent. This is not isolated misconduct—it is organized crime under color of law. The piece stands as both public notice and evidentiary documentation for further federal action.

RICO-Fueled Courtroom Corruption in Riverside: Attorney Tamara L. Wagner Implicated for Fraud and Abuse of Office

RICO-Fueled Courtroom Corruption in Riverside: Attorney Tamara L. Wagner Implicated for Fraud and Abuse of Office

Tamara L. Wagner (CA Bar #188613), a licensed attorney acting as a judicial officer in Riverside County, is now at the center of a federal removal action citing judicial fraud, civil rights violations, and RICO conspiracy. Defendants allege she is unlawfully practicing law from the bench without constitutional authority, advancing proceedings in open dishonor. Verified affidavits, UCC filings, and summary judgment demands were ignored, leading to claims of railroading and systemic court corruption. The case, removed under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1441, 1443, and 1446, is now pending in federal court.

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.

error: Content is protected !!