Sovereignty by Trust How a Foreign Trust Qualifies as a Nation Under International Law

Sovereignty by Trust: How a Foreign Trust Qualifies as a Nation Under International Law

A foreign trust can lawfully serve as the foundation of a nation, meeting the core criteria for statehood established by the Montevideo Convention. Possessing legal personality, defined territory, a permanent population, and a governing structure, it functions as a sovereign entity under both contract and treaty law. This article explores how foreign trusts establish legitimate nations with the authority to govern, enter into agreements, and assert independence on the global stage.


🧾 What Is a Foreign Trust in This Context?

A foreign trust is:

  • A contractual legal arrangement (often irrevocable) between trustees, settlors, and beneficiaries.

  • Domiciled outside the jurisdiction of a given government—usually non-domestic, non-taxable, and private.

  • Operated under private law, not statutory public policy.

When used to create a nation-state, it becomes the contractual vessel through which governance, asset protection, and jurisdiction are declared and managed.

In this way, the foreign trust itself functions as the nation.


✅ Why a Foreign Trust Qualifies as a Nation

A foreign trust can be recognized as a nation or private state because:

1. It Has Legal Personality

The trust, via trustees, can contract, sue, be sued, hold property, and issue rules—just like a sovereign. In international law, the capacity to enter into relations with other states is one of the four key criteria for statehood under the Montevideo Convention.

2. It Can Declare Jurisdiction and Law

A properly constructed trust indenture can establish:

  • Law form (natural law, common law, ecclesiastical law)

  • Jurisdiction

  • Venue

  • Governing authority

This forms the governmental structure of the nation, satisfying another Montevideo criterion.

3. It Can Have Members/Citizens

The trust can define members or beneficiaries as the permanent population of the nation. These people consent to be governed under its private law system, fulfilling the “permanent population” requirement under international law.

4. It Can Own or Claim Land

The trust can claim and hold land privately or under ecclesiastical/ancestral right (think: tribal or hereditary trusts). It may also define jurisdiction over land contractually or symbolically. This satisfies the territory requirement under Montevideo.

5. It Can Enter Into Treaties and Contracts

The trust can issue agreements with other private nations, tribes, foreign trusts, or even nation-states. The ability to enter into treaties and formal relations is the fourth key requirement for nationhood under international law.

6. It Avoids State Interference

Because it’s private and foreign to the domestic system, it often enjoys immunity under:

  • Private international law

  • The Hague Conventions

  • Trust treaty protections

  • Comity of nations

This makes it more sovereign than even many “recognized” states that are internally beholden to public policy.


🛡️ Famous Examples of Trust-Based Sovereignty

  • Ecclesiastical Sovereign Trusts – Used by religious microstates and orders like the Vatican or the Knights of Malta.

  • Indigenous Nations – Many tribal nations operate under hereditary or natural trusts.

  • Private International Governments – Such as certain U.N. agencies or global banks, which operate on supranational trust structures.

  • Financial Sovereign Entities – The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) is a prime example of a trust-structured supranational entity.

These prove the trust model is not only valid—but powerful.


🧰 Pro Tips for Building a Nation-State via Foreign Trust

These are not merely strategic—they are practical applications of international law:

  • Use a contract trust or common law trust, not a statutory trust.

  • Declare the trust as operating under lex mercatoria, natural law, or divine law, depending on your philosophy.

  • Make sure the trust has:

    • Trustees (governing body)

    • Trust indenture (charter/constitution)

    • Settlor (founder)

    • Beneficiaries (the people/nation)

    • Defined jurisdiction and choice of law

  • Record it publicly or internationally—through public notices, foreign registries, UPU, Hague Apostilles, or treaty-based announcements.

Each of these elements mimics the same functional markers required of a sovereign state under the Montevideo Convention (1933).


🧩 Bottom Line

Yes—a foreign trust can qualify as the core legal instrument to form a nation, state, tribe, or private society under:

  • ✅ Contract law

  • ✅ International law (with proper expression)

  • ✅ Treaty law (if you enter into agreements)

  • ✅ Natural law / private governance frameworks

The foreign trust becomes the vessel of sovereignty, housing your law, your people, your land, and your government—all by contract, consent, and record. It’s not only a nation—it’s a lawful person in the family of nations.

Leave your vote

1536822 points
More

Don’t Stop Here

More To Explore

Screen Shot 2025 07 08 at 9.35.01 PM

EMERGENCY PETITION FOR WRIT MANDAMUS VANISHES: Ninth Circuit Fraud, Tampering, Judicial Collusion, and a Federal Cover-Up Seems Unequivocal

Federal courts are now under scrutiny after a verified Writ of Mandamus vanished from the Ninth Circuit docket without explanation—raising grave concerns of judicial tampering, fraud, and systemic misconduct. Judge Sunshine Sykes defied clear jurisdictional divestiture by issuing rulings on a matter under appellate review, violating 28 U.S.C. § 144 and § 1651. This article exposes a disturbing pattern of ultra vires acts, denial of due process, and potential RICO violations implicating both district and appellate judges.Ask ChatGPT

lawful tender discharges the debt

When the Debt Is Discharged but the LIEN Remains: Why Auto and Home Loan Lenders Who Ignore Lawful Tender Are Committing Fraud and Commercial Crimes

This article delivers a devastating legal breakdown proving that lawful tender—once made and unrebutted—discharges auto loan debt under UCC §§ 3-601, 3-603, 3-310, 2-206, and 1-103, as codified in Cal. Com. Code §§ 3601, 3603, 3310, 2206, 1103, Fla. Stat. §§ 673.6011, 673.6031, 673.3101, 672.206, 671.103, and N.C.G.S. §§ 25-3-601, 25-3-603, 25-3-310, 25-2-206, 25-1-103. It exposes refusal to release a lien after lawful discharge as actionable fraud, conversion, embezzlement, and obstruction under state and federal law. With verified case law and commercial principles, it explains how silence equals acceptance and how creditors become commercially estopped. A must-read for secured parties, fiduciaries, and equity claimants demanding lien removal, declaratory relief, and commercial remedy.

Screen Shot 2025 06 28 at 4.55.33 PM

How a Perfected Security Agreement and UCC Filings Strip Servicers of Foreclosure Rights

A properly executed Security Agreement assigning all assets, rights, and interests to a private trust—paired with a UCC-1 financing statement and UCC-3 amendment claiming the Deed of Trust and Note—lawfully establishes the trust as the secured party and real party in interest. This perfected interest, under UCC §§ 9-203, 9-509, 3-301, and supported by controlling case law (e.g., Carpenter v. Longan, Ibanez, Veal), strips any servicer or third-party of standing to foreclose unless they possess the original Note, prove an unbroken chain of title, and rebut the trust’s perfected claim. Without that, all foreclosure attempts become void ab initio, commercial dishonor, and legal trespass on private trust property.

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.

error: Content is protected !!