Screen Shot 2025 01 28 at 1.15.19 PM

YouTube’s Complicity in Attacks on American Rights: Van Ballion and Law Talks with Mike’s Campaign of Defamation and Misinformation

Van Ballion (Nigel Turner), a UK-based content creator, and Michael J. Gravlin, an attorney at law behind the channel Law Talks with Mike, are accused by critics of actively undermining the constitutional rights of Americans. Their content spreads misinformation, misrepresents legal concepts, and wages smear campaigns against non-citizen nationals/nationals and state Citizens who assert their lawful rights and expect Constitutional security and protection. Michael Gravlin's role as an officer of the court raises concerns about ethical violations, as his platform reportedly labels Americans with disparaging terms such as "Sov Cits" to maliciously disprage and undermine their legal advocacy. Van Ballion, despite lacking ties to the U.S. legal system, interferes in American civic discourse through malicious, dispraging, and harmful commentary. The KEVIN WALKER ESTATE is now preparing to sue YouTube, Turner, and Gravlin for malicious defamation, libel, and conspiracy to undermine lawful discourse, conspiracy and racketerring against the people of America. Americans seeking to protect their rights or who have been defamed are encouraged to assert their rights and seek redress.

In an era where digital platforms shape public discourse, YouTube has become a hub for legal commentary and information on constitutional rights. While these discussions often foster awareness and education, certain creators allegedly cross ethical and legal boundaries by spreading misinformation and engaging in propaganda campaigns that harm the American public.

Two YouTube channels, Van Ballion (Nigel Turner from Leeds, West Yorkshire United Kingdom) and Law Talks with Mike (Michael J. Gravlin from Chicago Illinois), have been identified by Americans as actively undermining the Constitutional rights of Americans and actively and aggressively waging war against the Constitution and the people of America. Their content is created and used to constantly misrepresent legal concepts and launch malicious smear campaigns against U.S. citizens, national, state Citizen, and Americans who assert their unalienable inherent lawful rights.

Screen Shot 2025 01 28 at 12.59.49 PM

Screen Shot 2025 01 28 at 5.41.49 AM

Weaponizing YouTube Against the American People

Both Van Ballion and Michael J. Gravlin have affirmatively weaponized YouTube and media content to target and defame Americans standing up for their constitutional rights. By producing maliciously misleading, dispraging, and defamatory legal commentary, their platforms act as propaganda machines that attempt to discredit individuals seeking lawful redress. Critics assert that their tactics have shifted from legal analysis to outright smear campaigns designed to suppress dissent and lawful advocacy.

Through defamatory labels such as “Sov Cits” these criminals and domestic terrorists discourage civic engagement by misrepresenting legitimate legal arguments and vilifying those who assert their rights. By doing so, they are accused of stifling meaningful public discourse and fueling negative narratives that harm the American public’s understanding of their lawful protections.

The complicit role of YouTube in promoting this harmful content has only exacerbated the problem. By monetizing and amplifying the reach of these creators, YouTube is accused of contributing to the erosion of public trust and supporting narratives that undermine constitutional rights.

 

Criminal Foreign Interference in American Legal Discourse and Active Domestic Terrorism

Van Ballion, believed to be a UK-based content creator (Nigel Turner), has drawn sharp criticism for commenting extensively on American legal matters without any direct connection to the U.S. legal system. Critics argue that his foreign perspective not only lacks legal legitimacy but also amounts to blatant interference in the education and information available to the American public.

The dissemination of legal propaganda by a non-American figure is seen as harmful to the United States because it can distort public understanding of legal principles and discourage individuals from standing up for their constitutional rights. This interference poses a threat to the public’s ability to make informed decisions about legal and civic matters.

The Complicity of YouTube

Americans, state Citizens, nationals, and other assert that YouTube has and continues facilitated this damaging, injurious, and harmful content by enabling and promoting treasonous creators like Van Ballion and Michael Gravlin (Law Talks with Mike) while simultaneously censoring voices that advocate for constitutional rights and lawful governance. By monetizing content like Van Ballion or Law Talks with Mike that spreads misinformation and propaganda, YouTube faces an oncoming lawsuit filled with allegations of eroding public trust, treason, war against the people of America and the Constitution, and amplifying harmful narratives.

The platform’s promotion of foreign commentators on American legal matters has sparked concerns about its role in undermining national discourse. By giving a global platform to people like Van Ballion and Michael Gravlin, who may not fully understand U.S. legal systems, YouTube is actively contributing to the erosion of public trust in lawful advocacy.

Attorney at Law/Lawyer/Officer of Court Michael J. Gravlin’s Role and Malicious, Defamatory, and Disparaging Content

Michael J. Gravlin, an “attorney at law” and officer of the court, has also come under scrutiny for his role in disseminating what critics describe as terroristic materials that wage ware against the people of America and the Constitution. Through his channel Law Talks with Mike, Gravlin is accused of labeling American citizens as “deplorables” in a disparaging and defamatory manner. As an officer of the court, his alleged involvement in spreading misinformation and defamatory content raises concerns about ethical violations and the abuse of his professional position.

Furthermore, Michael J Gravlin maliciously disparages Americans and labels them “Sov Cits” in a condescending and insulting manner. This term is used by people like Michael Gravlin and Van Ballion (Nigel Turner) to insult, disparage, and deprive Americans under the color of law.

 

KEVIN WALKER ESTATE intend to Pursue Legal Action

In response to these ongoing issues, the KEVIN WALKER ESTATE is preparing to sue YouTube, Van Ballion (Nigel Turner), and Michael J. Gravlin for their confirmed roles in spreading propaganda, harmful content, and misinformation. The lawsuit is expected to focus on claims of defamation, libel, slander, the dissemination of terroristic material, Van Ballion (Nigel Turner), and Michael J. Gravlin’s active war against the Constitution and American people, and their active conspiracy to undermine lawful discourse in the United States.

Critics assert that these actions constitute an attack on American sovereignty and violate the fundamental rights of citizens who seek to uphold the Constitution and defend their legal freedoms. The KEVIN WALKER ESTATE’s legal action is seen as a necessary step to protect the integrity of public discourse and hold content creators accountable for their harmful narratives.

 

Join the Fight for Your Rights

Any Americans looking to fight for their rights, privacy, and freedom are encouraged to contact the KEVIN WALKER ESTATE and join the movement. If you have been defamed on either Van Ballion’s or Law Talks with Mike’s shows, the KEVIN WALKER ESTATE can assist you in submitting an affidavit and pursuing legal action. Protecting your reputation and standing up for your rights is essential in the face of misinformation and propaganda.

Active Propaganda and Misinformation

Michael Gravlin and Van Ballion’s commentary, described by critics as an active campaign of misinformation, works to delegitimize lawful arguments and cast Americans standing up for their rights in a harmful and negative light. Gravlin’s involvement as an “attorney at law” and “oficer of the court” amplifies these concerns, as it lends an air of credibility to content that critics believe is defamatory and harmful.

 

Protecting the American Public from Harmful Narratives

Given the serious implications of these assertions, advocates are calling for federal authorities like Pam Bondi and/or the acting Attorney General to investigate the influence of foreign commentators like Van Ballion and Michael Gravlin and the role of “licensed” professionals like Michael Gravlin in spreading propaganda and misinformation harmful to the American people.

 

The Need for Accountability and Vigilance

It is imperative for American citizens to be critical when consuming legal commentary online. Viewers should seek out verified legal experts, cross-check information with credible sources, and challenge narratives that lack factual grounding. The harm caused by foreign commentators and misinformation campaigns can have lasting consequences on public trust and understanding of constitutional principles.

As digital platforms continue to shape public discourse, content creators must be held accountable for the accuracy and integrity of their discussions. Upholding truth and protecting American discourse from foreign interference are essential to maintaining a strong, informed, and lawful society.

Leave your vote

362801 points
More

Don’t Stop Here

More To Explore

Screen Shot 2025 01 28 at 1.15.19 PM

YouTube’s Complicity in Attacks on American Rights: Van Ballion and Law Talks with Mike’s Campaign of Defamation and Misinformation

Van Ballion (Nigel Turner), a UK-based content creator, and Michael J. Gravlin, an attorney at law behind the channel Law Talks with Mike, are accused by critics of actively undermining the constitutional rights of Americans. Their content spreads misinformation, misrepresents legal concepts, and wages smear campaigns against non-citizen nationals/nationals and state Citizens who assert their lawful rights and expect Constitutional security and protection. Michael Gravlin’s role as an officer of the court raises concerns about ethical violations, as his platform reportedly labels Americans with disparaging terms such as "Sov Cits" to maliciously disprage and undermine their legal advocacy. Van Ballion, despite lacking ties to the U.S. legal system, interferes in American civic discourse through malicious, dispraging, and harmful commentary. The KEVIN WALKER ESTATE is now preparing to sue YouTube, Turner, and Gravlin for malicious defamation, libel, and conspiracy to undermine lawful discourse, conspiracy and racketerring against the people of America. Americans seeking to protect their rights or who have been defamed are encouraged to assert their rights and seek redress.

The Deceptive Tactics of Banks and Lawyers:Attorneys at Law:Officers of the Court A Breakdown of Common Legal Evasions

The Deceptive Tactics of Banks and Lawyers/Attorneys at Law: A Breakdown of Common Legal Evasions

In legal proceedings, some parties may resort to deceptive tactics to avoid addressing the actual issues at hand. These tactics include dismissing valid arguments with vague, unsupported claims like “baseless” or “meritless” and avoiding engagement with evidence or legal references. Instead of addressing the facts, the opposing side might use emotional language, misrepresent your position, or shift the burden of proof onto you. These strategies are often employed to distract from the lack of a solid defense or to obscure the weakness of their own case. Recognizing these behaviors can help you stay focused on the core legal issues and ensure that the dispute is resolved based on merit.

SDCCU, Sheppard Mullin, Michael D Starks, and Blake Partridge are actively Waging War Against the Constitution and the American People

SDCCU, Sheppard Mullin, Michael D Starks, and Blake Partridge are actively Waging War Against the Constitution and the American People

The Constitution of the United States serves as the bedrock of our nation, guaranteeing unalienable rights, due process, and the supremacy of the people over the government. Yet, Sheppard Mullin, Shannon Peterson, and Blake Partridge, Junior Partner at Sastre, Saavedra & Epstein, PLLC, have demonstrated through their actions that they stand in direct opposition to these foundational principles. Their conduct represents a calculated assault on constitutional protections and the sovereignty of the American people, effectively waging war against the Constitution and its intended purpose.

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.

error: Content is protected !!

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.

error: Content is protected !!