How to Lawfully Represent Your ‘Trust’ as an “Attorney-in-Fact” in Accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1654, U.C.C. § 3-402, and Article 1 Section 10 of the Constitution

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Tips, Trust

The authority to represent a trust as an attorney-in-fact is firmly established under federal law, the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), and longstanding legal precedent. Contrary to common misconceptions, a trust operates as a contractual entity, granting it the ability to be lawfully represented by an authorized agent, including an attorney-in-fact. This article explores the legal framework affirming this right, highlights key statutory provisions, and provides strategies for enforcing it against courts and financial institutions that unlawfully challenge or deny such authority.

The authority to represent a trust as an attorney-in-fact is firmly established under federal law, the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), and longstanding legal precedent. Contrary to common misconceptions, a trust operates as a contractual entity, granting it the ability to be lawfully represented by an authorized agent, including an attorney-in-fact. This article explores the legal framework affirming this right, highlights key statutory provisions, and provides strategies for enforcing it against courts and financial institutions that unlawfully challenge or deny such authority.

Judicial Misconduct in Riverside, California: Defendant PHH Mortgage’s (“loan servicer”) Baseless Motion and the Court’s Obstruction of Justice

Categories
Business, Constitution, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust, Wealth

PHH Mortgage’s Motion to Dismiss in Kevin Walker Estate, et al. v. PHH Mortgage Corporation, et al. exemplifies judicial overreach, procedural abuse, and a blatant disregard for constitutional rights. The motion falsely asserts that a trust cannot be represented by an attorney-in-fact, denying individuals their right to self-representation and claiming that only "attorneys at law" can act in court. This contradicts established legal principles, including the American Bar Association’s recognition of power of attorney as a legitimate instrument granting broad authority. Additionally, the court has obstructed the record by refusing to file Plaintiffs’ documents, prompting a writ of mandamus to expose the Riverside Federal Court’s misconduct. This case underscores a broader pattern of legal corruption, defamation, and deprivation of rights under the color of law.

The Structure of Law Firms: Key Positions and Their Responsibilities

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Wealth

In this article, we explore the structure and hierarchy of law firms, highlighting the different career stages from junior attorneys to senior partners. Understanding these roles is crucial for those navigating the legal profession, as each position carries distinct responsibilities and levels of authority.

“Attorney at Law” vs an “Attorney in Fact”: Have You Become ‘a ward of the court’ ?

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Tips, Trust

In legal practice, the roles of an "Attorney at Law" (commonly referred to as a "Lawyer") and an "Attorney in Fact" are distinct and carry different responsibilities and powers. This distinction is crucial when considering legal representation, personal agency, and the management of one’s affairs, especially in terms of maintaining personal sovereignty.