The Difference Between a Demand and a Motion in Legal and Commercial Contexts

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

Understanding the distinction between a demand and a motion is essential in legal and commercial matters, as each serves a different purpose and reflects the position of the party making the submission. While both terms involve asserting rights or seeking outcomes, the processes, implications, and advantages of each vary significantly. This article explores these differences in depth, outlining their roles, functions, and strategic applications.

Writ of Mandamus Prompts Record to be “Modified,” BUT Key Notice of Defendants’ Default, Dishonor, and Failure Still Missing from Records

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

In the case involving ™STEVEN MACARTHUR-BROOKS© ESTATE and ™STEVEN MACARTHUR-BROOKS© IRR TRUST Plaintiffs, acting through their Attorney-In-Fact, and Defendants, SDCCU and SHEPPARD MULLIN, significant developments have occurred in the wake of a Writ of Mandamus being submitted to Judge Roy K. Altman’s chambers and the Supreme Court of the United States. Several pivotal documents have been added to the official court record, underscoring the plaintiffs’ relentless efforts to re-affirm defendants’ dishonor, default, and willful and intentional non-compliance. However, one crucial document remains conspicuously absent from the record, further complicating the judicial process.

Understanding the Legal Frameworks: U.C.C., U.S.C., CFR, U.S. Constitution, Organic Constitution, and State Constitutions

Categories
Business, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust, Wealth

The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) standardizes commercial transaction laws across all U.S. states, ensuring consistency in commerce, contracts, and finance. The United States Code (USC) organizes federal statutes into 54 titles, serving as the legal foundation for areas like taxation, criminal law, and public welfare. The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) provides detailed rules from federal agencies to implement these statutes, defining industry-specific compliance. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law, establishing the framework for governance and safeguarding individual rights, while state constitutions address local governance and rights within the bounds of federal law. The Organic Constitution, encompassing foundational documents like the Declaration of Independence and Articles of Confederation, offers historical context and reflects the Founders’ vision of limited federal power and state sovereignty. Together, these frameworks define the interplay between federal, state, and administrative laws.

Incoming WRIT OF MANDAMUS as Judge Roy K Altman’s Clerks Mutilate Records, Obstruct Filings, and Engage in Racketeering and Conspiracy

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Trust, Wealth

While the order purports to address procedural concerns, its broader implications—and the actions (or inactions) of the court—have sparked significant criticism. The case has drawn attention due to the court’s handling of filings, its potential disregard for due process, and what many perceive as a concerning lack of judicial accountability. When contacting the CLERKS in chambers to inquire about to missing filing/documents which have clearly been receiving, the clerks either refuse to provide any information or guidance on a time frame, and/or they act arrogantly and hang up in your face, telling you to "never call chambers."  The clerks act as if they are above the law and they show little to no respect for the people as their public servants. 

$16 Billion Case Against SDCCU: Plaintiffs Demand Default, Sanctions, and Summary Judgment in Response to Judge Altman’s Order

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Law/Legal, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

In a decisive move to hold the Defendants accountable for their ongoing misconduct and failure to comply with court orders, the Plaintiffs have filed a "SUPPLEMENTAL AFFIRMATION OF RECORD, NOTICE OF DEFENDANTS’ CONTINUED DISHONOR, DEFAULT, AND WILLFUL NONCOMPLIANCE, AND REQUEST [DEMAND] FOR SANCTIONS, SUMMARY JUDGEMENT, AND RELIEF" in the ongoing litigation before Judge Roy K. Altman. This filing underscores the Plaintiffs’ determination to secure justice and highlights the Defendants’ blatant disregard for the legal process, affirming the legal basis for sanctions, default judgment, and summary judgment in the Plaintiffs’ favor.

Comprehensive Remedies for Addressing Judicial Delays and Inaction

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

If a judge takes an excessive amount of time to decide a case, there are multiple actions you can take, including some lesser-known or rare strategies. These options range from procedural remedies to extraordinary measures, depending on the severity of the delay and the jurisdiction. Below is a comprehensive list

Equity vs. UCC: A Comparative Analysis of Remedies, Predictability, and Incorporation of Principles

Categories
Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust, Wealth

The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) and equity law provide distinct frameworks for resolving disputes and enforcing obligations. Equity law focuses on fairness and flexibility, often stepping in when strict legal rules lead to unjust outcomes. Conversely, the UCC brings structure and predictability to commercial transactions while incorporating equitable principles to ensure fairness in its application. This article explores how the UCC integrates equity, examines the strengths and weaknesses of each system, and highlights key provisions like UCC §§ 1-103, 2-202, 2-203, 2-204, 2-206, 2-302, 3-303, 3-311, 3-603, 3-604, and others.

Discharging ANY Debt: How the “Accepted for Value” (A4V) Process is Codified in the Uniform Commercial Code 👀

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust, Wealth

The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) provides a structured legal framework for negotiable instruments, obligations, and their discharge. Among its provisions, sections like UCC §§ 3-303, 3-604, 3-104, 3-409, 2-206, and 1-103 reveal a clear foundation for the Accepted for Value (A4V) process. This process allows obligations such as mortgages, loans, or other debts to be addressed through lawful mechanisms of discharge, settlement, or setoff.

Riverside County West Coast Exotic Cars Faces $1 Billion Lawsuit for Fraud, Racketeering, Monopolization of Trade and Commerce, and more

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust, Wealth

West Coast Exotic Cars, along with Eric Curran, Aaron Johnson, Hunter, and additional staff, are embroiled in a $1 billion […]

STEVEN MACARTHUR BROOKS Estate Files $2.975 BILLION Lawsuit Against SAN DIEGO COUNTY CREDIT UNION Seeking Summary Judgement

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust, Wealth

Steven MacArthur Brooks’ estate has filed a $2.975 billion lawsuit against San Diego County Credit Union, asserting a binding contract and seeking summary judgment. The lawsuit emphasizes the plaintiffs’ status as secured creditors under UCC provisions, supported by unrebutted affidavits and evidence of contractual acceptance. The case centers on a contract and security agreement, with claims of non-response from defendants validating the demand for summary judgment as a matter of law.

The Fourteenth Amendment: Clarifying the Superiority of ‘state citizen’ Rights over ‘U.S. citizen’ Rights

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

The Fourteenth Amendment created and clarified the concept of U.S. citizenship. Before the amendment, it was widely believed and accepted […]

Explained: What is a “Sovereign Citizen” ?

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust, Wealth

The term "Sovereign Citizen" is a derogatory and weaponized label, used as propaganda to describe men or women who claim sovereignty but lack a full understanding of the legal distinctions between public and private law. As outlined in CFR § 27.11 and Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 of the U.S. Constitution, the commercial nature of all interactions is evident, yet these individuals struggle to navigate this framework correctly. They attempt to reserve their rights and operate independently but misuse terminology, failing to create unsworn declarations that comply with 28 U.S. Code § 1746. They also misunderstand critical concepts like jurisdiction, contract law, and administrative procedures. They often mix public and private law, leaving them unable to effectively assert and protect their rights as intended under UCC § 1-308. Additionally, they overlook the significance of Article 1, Section 10 of the Constitution, which highlights the restrictions placed on states concerning legal tender, further emphasizing the complexities they misunderstand.