PHH Mortgage’s Motion to Dismiss in Kevin Walker Estate, et al. v. PHH Mortgage Corporation, et al. exemplifies judicial overreach, procedural abuse, and a blatant disregard for constitutional rights. The motion falsely asserts that a trust cannot be represented by an attorney-in-fact, denying individuals their right to self-representation and claiming that only "attorneys at law" can act in court. This contradicts established legal principles, including the American Bar Association’s recognition of power of attorney as a legitimate instrument granting broad authority. Additionally, the court has obstructed the record by refusing to file Plaintiffs’ documents, prompting a writ of mandamus to expose the Riverside Federal Court’s misconduct. This case underscores a broader pattern of legal corruption, defamation, and deprivation of rights under the color of law.
The shift from the term “chauffeur” to “driver” in legal contexts represents more than just a change in terminology; it reveals a broader attempt by the State to regulate vehicle operation as a commercial activity. This transition directly impacts citizens’ fundamental right to travel freely, as upheld by the Supreme Court on numerous occasions. Below, we delve into how this shift affects your rights and why State laws often blur the lines between private travel and commercial activity.
There is a little-known connection between crime and "commercial" law that often goes unnoticed by the general public but is strategically exploited within the legal and financial systems. The concept that all crimes are, in essence, "commercial" unveils a hidden truth about how criminal acts are tied to the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). This revelation suggests that most, if not all, crimes are treated as breaches of "commercial" contracts or infringements upon the state’s financial interests. Most private citizens are unaware of this dynamic, leaving them vulnerable to a legal system that uses "commercial" principles against them, profiting off their lack of education
A troubling, injurious, damaging, and treasonous aspect of Zillow’s operations is its reporting of properties as being in "pre-foreclosure" or "pending auction" status when, in reality, these properties are already titled in the name of a private, non-statutory, irrevocable trust. These properties are not subject to any legitimate foreclosure and are clearly beyond the jurisdiction of the COUNTY RECORDER. While this may appear to be an innocuous feature, it has profound implications for Americans, particularly non-citizen nationals, nationals of the United States, internationally protected persons, and State Citizens, who are being adversely affected, injured, and damaged by these practices.