Equitable Subrogation along with Natural Law and Trust Law is the Remedy to Stop the Unjust Enrichment. It is for the "Restitution" of our Private God Given Rights which is our PROPERTY. Subrogation means "Substitution". That’s what the Banksters and the Fictional "STATE" did to our Mothers when they were "deceived" into "Registering" our PROPERTY — Our Equitable Rights and Remedies were Subrogated/Substituted.
Equity is a parallel legal system grounded in conscience, fairness, and moral justice, developed to address the limitations and rigidity of common law. It offers remedies where legal (monetary) relief is insufficient—such as injunctions, constructive trusts, and specific performance. Equity acts upon the person rather than the property (in personam), and is guided by enduring maxims, including: “He who comes into equity must come with clean hands” and “Equity regards as done that which ought to be done.” It ensures that rights are enforced not merely by law, but by what is just and honorable.
This article explains how contracts can be formed through conduct, communication, and performance — even without a signature — under common law, equity, and the UCC. It highlights how real estate and auto sales can become legally binding when an offer is made, payment is tendered, and the other party accepts by silence or action. Citing UCC §§ 2-204, 2-206, and 1-103, the article shows how equity enforces what "ought to be done" when formalities are absent but intent and performance are clear.
When brokers act, equity responds — even without a signed contract. This article explains how real property rights can vest through conduct, silence, and lawful tender. Learn how equitable title arises when an offer is accepted by behavior, not just by words. Discover how to protect your position through affidavits, UCC filings, and quiet title actions. In equity, what ought to be done is treated as done — and truth leaves a paper trail.
The Kevin Walker Estate, et al., has intensified its legal fight for rights, accountability, and justice by filing a Writ of Mandamus and an Order Granting Default and Summary Judgment, demanding the court enforce Defendants’ binding default and immediate liability for $1.1 billion. The court has already identified PHH Mortgage Services’ Motion to Dismiss as procedurally defective and subject to striking, further evidencing Defendants’ dishonor. With Chevron deference overturned, the court is bound to rule strictly on constitutional and statutory law, without arbitrary dismissal. Should the court fail to act, Plaintiffs are prepared to escalate the matter through appellate relief, federal enforcement, and sanctions for obstruction of justice. This case has the potential to establish a landmark precedent in ensuring financial institutions and courts adhere to the rule of law.
The Kevin Walker Estate, et al., has intensified its legal fight for rights, accountability, and justice by filing a Writ of Mandamus and an Order Granting Default and Summary Judgment, demanding the court enforce Defendants’ binding default and immediate liability for $1.1 billion. The court has already identified PHH Mortgage Services’ Motion to Dismiss as procedurally defective and subject to striking, further evidencing Defendants’ dishonor. With Chevron deference overturned, the court is bound to rule strictly on constitutional and statutory law, without arbitrary dismissal. Should the court fail to act, Plaintiffs are prepared to escalate the matter through appellate relief, federal enforcement, and sanctions for obstruction of justice. This case has the potential to establish a landmark precedent in ensuring financial institutions and courts adhere to the rule of law.
Article III courts, established under the U.S. Constitution, are essential for protecting rights in civil contract disputes involving unrebutted affidavits. They uphold due process guaranteed by the Constitution, recognize uncontested evidence, and offer both legal and equitable remedies. With exclusive equity jurisdiction, these courts can enforce obligations, issue injunctions, and affirm binding agreements, ensuring justice and constitutional compliance
Exploring equitable subrogation and its independence from UCC requirements: This article addresses a bank‘s challenge claiming the UCC supplants equitable subrogation rights. Backed by case law and UCC §1-103, it confirms that subrogation arises by equity, not contract, ensuring sureties’ priority over security interests without UCC filings. Learn how federal and state courts affirm these principles and the limitations of UCC Title 9 in such contexts.
The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) and equity law provide distinct frameworks for resolving disputes and enforcing obligations. Equity law focuses on fairness and flexibility, often stepping in when strict legal rules lead to unjust outcomes. Conversely, the UCC brings structure and predictability to commercial transactions while incorporating equitable principles to ensure fairness in its application. This article explores how the UCC integrates equity, examines the strengths and weaknesses of each system, and highlights key provisions like UCC §§ 1-103, 2-202, 2-203, 2-204, 2-206, 2-302, 3-303, 3-311, 3-603, 3-604, and others.
ALL bank accounts have two sides to them. A Public (liabilities) side and a Private (assets) side, as substantiated by […]