Fraud, Color of Law, and RICO Violations by Attorney Monika Vermani (Bar #355080) Exposed in Riverside County, California

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

Attorney Monika Vermani (CA Bar #355080) has been formally named in a high-level commercial fraud and racketeering operation involving Riverside County’s unlawful prosecution of a secured private trust estate. Verified affidavits, unrebutted notices, and perfected UCC filings establish that Vermani is proceeding without lawful jurisdiction, operating under color of law, and aiding in the unauthorized securitization and monetization of private estate assets. The record demands $100 million in damages, immediate dismissal with prejudice, and criminal prosecution under 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242, and 1961–1968 (RICO). This case exposes a systemic pattern of commercial fraud, identity theft, and administrative conspiracy masquerading as routine judicial process.

Attorney Monika Vermani (CA Bar #355080) has been formally named in a high-level commercial fraud and racketeering operation involving Riverside County’s unlawful prosecution of a secured private trust estate. Verified affidavits, unrebutted notices, and perfected UCC filings establish that Vermani is proceeding without lawful jurisdiction, operating under color of law, and aiding in the unauthorized securitization and monetization of private estate assets. The record demands $100 million in damages, immediate dismissal with prejudice, and criminal prosecution under 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242, and 1961–1968 (RICO). This case exposes a systemic pattern of commercial fraud, identity theft, and administrative conspiracy masquerading as routine judicial process.

How to Convene a 12-Panel Grand Jury: Citizen Authority vs. State Monopoly

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, News, Realworldfare, Securities, Sovereigns, Trust

Learn how private citizens can lawfully initiate grand jury investigations through both statutory and common law means. This article explains the difference between court-convened grand juries and citizen-led panels formed under First Amendment and natural law authority. From submitting affidavits to the U.S. Attorney under 18 U.S.C. § 3332(a), to organizing lawful assemblies that issue true bills, the guide walks through each step. It empowers those facing systemic fraud, corruption, or due process violations with a lawful path to remedy. Grand juries are not just for prosecutors—they are a tool for the people.

Zillow, Title Fraud, and the Engineered Dispossession of Private Property

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Sovereigns, Trust

Zillow functions as a data monopoly that omits Grant Deeds, Warranty Deeds, and equitable liens from its property reports—concealing true ownership while promoting foreclosure narratives. This article exposes how Zillow, in collusion with county agencies like Riverside County, helps institutional actors ignore lawful private trust conveyances. Public records confirm that MEMORY STARBURST TRUST and WG PRIVATE IRREVOCABLE TRUST lawfully conveyed title, yet those transactions are suppressed under color of law. The result is a fraudulent appearance of foreclosure legitimacy, violating due process and facilitating commercial theft. Zillow’s omission isn’t accidental—it’s a systemic framework of fraud, dishonor, and property rights abuse masked as public information.

Confirmed Record Tampering and Judicial Fraud: Judge Jesus G. Bernal Dismisses Case In Chambers After Concealing Three Sworn Filings

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

Three sworn court documents were lawfully submitted and ignored. Judge Jesus G. Bernal concealed them, then dismissed the case in chambers—privately, without hearing, and under color of law. The Plaintiffs filed an unrebutted affidavit establishing judicial fraud and conspiracy. That affidavit stands as law. Due process was denied, and the Constitution disregarded.

Color of Law Crimes: When Sheriffs Ignore Their Oath

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

Peace officers, including sheriffs, take an oath to uphold the Constitution—but when they exceed their lawful authority, they operate under color of law. Even without malicious intent, incompetence or inadequate training can result in serious civil rights violations. Under 18 U.S.C. § 242, depriving someone of their rights—whether knowingly or through ignorance—is a federal offense. The law is clear: ignorance is no excuse, especially for those entrusted to enforce it.

Riverside County Retaliation, RICO, and Fraud: Verified Affidavits Confirm Fraud, RICO, and Constitutional Violations by Riverside County’s Michael Hestrin and Miranda Thomson and Riverside County Sheriff

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

Fraudulent and unsigned charges brought against Kevin Lewis Walker—just days after filing his federal civil rights lawsuit—have been exposed as a retaliatory and criminal act of extortion. Lacking a signature, verified complaint, or injured party, the prosecution itself now stands as prima facie evidence of RICO violations, mail fraud, and abuse of process. The individuals involved—including a newly licensed attorney and the Riverside County DA—are fully liable and accountable under the law.